100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Class notes

frustration in contract law

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
3
Uploaded on
07-07-2023
Written in
2022/2023

A concise and detailed set of notes covering frustration in contract law, covering various key principles and going over key cases.

Institution
Course








Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Study
Unknown
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
July 7, 2023
Number of pages
3
Written in
2022/2023
Type
Class notes
Professor(s)
Guy blundell
Contains
All classes

Subjects

Content preview

Frustration
 Breach- fail to perform obligations under the contract, or refuses to perform or
provides defective performance, and does not have a lawful excuse for the breach.
 High threshold for frustration- excuse liability
 Situation arises after contract is made.
 Makes contract “impossible” or illegal to perform.
 Must cause fundamental change to parties’ obligations.
 Not caused by either party and not foreseeable

 Force majeure clause
- Enables parties to make provision for what should happen if particulate events
happen.
- Usually states that particular events do not give rise to breach and that parties
are not entitled to discharge the contract unless the events continue beyond a
certain time.
- Allows parties can exercise contract as to what will and what won’t happen in
unforeseen circumstances.
- Both parties must follow the clause provided for the specific event
- Jackson v Union Marine Insurance
 Ship ran aground, repairs took 8 months to complete.
 Accident was more extensive than what was provided for in the force
majeure clause, so it didn’t apply.
 Clause covered accidents but not extensive delays.
Subject matter has been destroyed/ is no longer available.
 Taylor v Caldwell
- Claimant hired hall from defendant.
- Fire destroyed the hall.
- Claimant sued for non-performance.
- Defence was that the hall was destroyed so couldn’t perform obligation.
Personal services
 Death or illness may give rise to frustration.
 Will depend on nature of contract and surrounding circumstances.
 Condor v The Barron Knights
Supervening illegality
 Law changes after contract is formed.
 If performed in accordance with the contract terms, it would be illegal.
 Fibrosa v Fairbain Lawson (1943)
 Islamic Republic or Iran Shipping Lines v Steamship Mutual Underwriting Association
(2010)
Frustration of purpose
CA$15.43
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
harrietmmacpherson

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
harrietmmacpherson University of Portsmouth
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
0
Member since
2 year
Number of followers
0
Documents
8
Last sold
-

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions