100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Examen

PSYC 224 UIUC Exam 3 Questions with Verified Solutions Latest Update 2025/2026

Puntuación
-
Vendido
-
Páginas
10
Grado
A+
Subido en
15-12-2025
Escrito en
2025/2026

PSYC 224 UIUC Exam 3 Questions with Verified Solutions Latest Update 2025/2026 The allowable sound combinations in a language are determined by the _____________ rules of that language. - Answers phonology The smallest significant unit of sound in a language is a __________ and the smallest significant unit of meaning in a language is a ___________. - Answers phoneme, morpheme A linguist is studying the _________ of English. She might conduct an experiment to determine how non-native speakers learn to use prefixes and suffixes. - Answers morphology Name some morphemes - Answers "ed", "s", "es" Noam Chomsky's famous saying "colorless green ideas sleep furiously" violates the rules of _________ but not the rules of ___________. - Answers semantics, syntax The ambiguity of sentences such as "visiting relatives can be a nuisance," is at the level of: - Answers pragmatics The fact that people recognize words more quickly when they are in a sentence that makes sense is consistent with what model? - Answers Interactive activation model Describe the interactive activation model - Answers Use all the information you have as soon as you can (signal, memory, context); top-down and bottom-up The Marx brothers joke "Last night I saw an elephant in my pajamas, how he got there, I'll never know" illustrates ambiguity at the level of: - Answers syntactic level What does the evidence suggest about the use of top-down information during language comprehension in experiments looking at how people resolve ambiguity at the level of (1) sound, (2) word meanings, (3) syntax? - Answers visual cues, linguistic cues, person-specific cues In an experiment, subjects heard the following sentences in which a particular sound was replaced with a loud crash: it was found the *out was on a lake, hanger, or farm. This experiment found: - Answers people heard word that made most sense, didn't notice missing sound (phonemic restoration effect) In an experiment looking at word meaning ambiguity, participants are asked to respond as quickly as possible to target words that are related in meaning to one of the senses of an ambiguous prime word. For example, participants might see the word "train" and then have to respond to either the word "bride" or the word "engine" (or an unrelated word like "couch" that serves as the baseline condition). The ambiguous word is presented in a sentence that is consistent with only one of the meanings. For example, the participant might read: "My whole family guesses the color of the last car whenever we are waiting for a passing train." and then have to respond to the target word "bride" or the target word "engine". Which pattern of results would be predicted by an interactive model of language comprehension? - Answers Use context to look up meaning that goes with sentence (engine) In an experiment looking at word meaning ambiguity, participants are asked to respond as quickly as possible to target words that are related in meaning to one of the senses of an ambiguous prime word. For example, participants might see the word "train" and then have to respond to either the word "bride" or the word "engine" (or an unrelated word like "couch" that serves as the baseline condition). The ambiguous word is presented in a sentence that is consistent with only one of the meanings. For example, the participant might read: "My whole family guesses the color of the last car whenever we are waiting for a passing train." and then have to respond to the target word "bride" or the target word "engine". What pattern would support a serial model? - Answers pick more common meaning of word (engine) A key debate in the language comprehension literature centers around whether or not people automatically make elaborative inferences as they read. One view, sometimes called the minimalist view, argues that they do NOT. Imagine that you ask people to read the following two versions of the same passage: "The robber [version 1: broke the glass][version 2: used force] in order to get into the house. After he took the owner's jewelry, he quickly exited through the window." As they read, you measure how long they fixate (look at) each word in the passage. What pattern of results would support the minimalist view? - Answers same fixations on each word If a person says they need to "twitch on the television," they have committed what kind of error? - Answers anticipation error List characteristics of sound exchange errors: - Answers occur mostly between nearby words, tend not to occur across phrases, do not respect grammatical category or function ("rack pat") List characteristics of word exchange errors: - Answers span some distance, respect grammatical category and function ("write a mother to my letter") Saying "I plan to deer brink at happy hour next Friday" (instead of "drink beer") is what kind(s) of error(s)? Is this a typical error for that type? - Answers Sound exchange Connectionist models of language production do a better job than serial models at explaining: - Answers mixed errors and lexical bias To examine these two types of models, Mike and Brian participate in an experiment. They are asked to silently read word pairs and, on occasion, are cued to read the pairs aloud as quickly as possible. On the first four trials, Mike and Brian are both given the following pairs of words, which they are to read silently: ball dome; beak doll; bus door; bell dark. On the fifth trial, Mike is cued to read aloud the following pair as quickly as possible: darn bore. Brian, however, is cued to read aloud a different pair of words as quickly as possible: dart board. The discrete, two-stage model would predict what? - Answers Doesn't care about words (Mike) To examine these two types of models, Mike and Brian participate in an experiment. They are asked to silently read word pairs and, on occasion, are cued to read the pairs aloud as quickly as possible. On the first four trials, Mike and Brian are both given the following pairs of words, which they are to read silently: ball dome; beak doll; bus door; bell dark. On the fifth trial, Mike is cued to read aloud the following pair as quickly as possible: darn bore. Brian, however, is cued to read aloud a different pair of words as quickly as possible: dart board. What about the interactive activation model? - Answers Cares about words (Brian)

Mostrar más Leer menos
Institución
PSYC 224
Grado
PSYC 224









Ups! No podemos cargar tu documento ahora. Inténtalo de nuevo o contacta con soporte.

Escuela, estudio y materia

Institución
PSYC 224
Grado
PSYC 224

Información del documento

Subido en
15 de diciembre de 2025
Número de páginas
10
Escrito en
2025/2026
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas

Temas

Vista previa del contenido

PSYC 224 UIUC Exam 3 Questions with Verified Solutions Latest Update 2025/2026

The allowable sound combinations in a language are determined by the _____________ rules of
that language. - Answers phonology

The smallest significant unit of sound in a language is a __________ and the smallest significant
unit of meaning in a language is a ___________. - Answers phoneme, morpheme

A linguist is studying the _________ of English. She might conduct an experiment to determine
how non-native speakers learn to use prefixes and suffixes. - Answers morphology

Name some morphemes - Answers "ed", "s", "es"

Noam Chomsky's famous saying "colorless green ideas sleep furiously" violates the rules of
_________ but not the rules of ___________. - Answers semantics, syntax

The ambiguity of sentences such as "visiting relatives can be a nuisance," is at the level of: -
Answers pragmatics

The fact that people recognize words more quickly when they are in a sentence that makes
sense is consistent with what model? - Answers Interactive activation model

Describe the interactive activation model - Answers Use all the information you have as soon as
you can (signal, memory, context); top-down and bottom-up

The Marx brothers joke "Last night I saw an elephant in my pajamas, how he got there, I'll never
know" illustrates ambiguity at the level of: - Answers syntactic level

What does the evidence suggest about the use of top-down information during language
comprehension in experiments looking at how people resolve ambiguity at the level of (1) sound,
(2) word meanings, (3) syntax? - Answers visual cues, linguistic cues, person-specific cues

In an experiment, subjects heard the following sentences in which a particular sound was
replaced with a loud crash: it was found the *out was on a lake, hanger, or farm. This experiment
found: - Answers people heard word that made most sense, didn't notice missing sound
(phonemic restoration effect)

In an experiment looking at word meaning ambiguity, participants are asked to respond as
quickly as possible to target words that are related in meaning to one of the senses of an
ambiguous prime word. For example, participants might see the word "train" and then have to
respond to either the word "bride" or the word "engine" (or an unrelated word like "couch" that
serves as the baseline condition). The ambiguous word is presented in a sentence that is
consistent with only one of the meanings. For example, the participant might read: "My whole
family guesses the color of the last car whenever we are waiting for a passing train." and then
have to respond to the target word "bride" or the target word "engine". Which pattern of results
would be predicted by an interactive model of language comprehension? - Answers Use context

, to look up meaning that goes with sentence (engine)

In an experiment looking at word meaning ambiguity, participants are asked to respond as
quickly as possible to target words that are related in meaning to one of the senses of an
ambiguous prime word. For example, participants might see the word "train" and then have to
respond to either the word "bride" or the word "engine" (or an unrelated word like "couch" that
serves as the baseline condition). The ambiguous word is presented in a sentence that is
consistent with only one of the meanings. For example, the participant might read: "My whole
family guesses the color of the last car whenever we are waiting for a passing train." and then
have to respond to the target word "bride" or the target word "engine". What pattern would
support a serial model? - Answers pick more common meaning of word (engine)

A key debate in the language comprehension literature centers around whether or not people
automatically make elaborative inferences as they read. One view, sometimes called the
minimalist view, argues that they do NOT. Imagine that you ask people to read the following two
versions of the same passage: "The robber [version 1: broke the glass][version 2: used force] in
order to get into the house. After he took the owner's jewelry, he quickly exited through the
window." As they read, you measure how long they fixate (look at) each word in the passage.
What pattern of results would support the minimalist view? - Answers same fixations on each
word

If a person says they need to "twitch on the television," they have committed what kind of error?
- Answers anticipation error

List characteristics of sound exchange errors: - Answers occur mostly between nearby words,
tend not to occur across phrases, do not respect grammatical category or function ("rack pat")

List characteristics of word exchange errors: - Answers span some distance, respect
grammatical category and function ("write a mother to my letter")

Saying "I plan to deer brink at happy hour next Friday" (instead of "drink beer") is what kind(s) of
error(s)? Is this a typical error for that type? - Answers Sound exchange

Connectionist models of language production do a better job than serial models at explaining: -
Answers mixed errors and lexical bias

To examine these two types of models, Mike and Brian participate in an experiment. They are
asked to silently read word pairs and, on occasion, are cued to read the pairs aloud as quickly as
possible. On the first four trials, Mike and Brian are both given the following pairs of words,
which they are to read silently: ball dome; beak doll; bus door; bell dark. On the fifth trial, Mike is
cued to read aloud the following pair as quickly as possible: darn bore. Brian, however, is cued
to read aloud a different pair of words as quickly as possible: dart board. The discrete, two-
stage model would predict what? - Answers Doesn't care about words (Mike)

To examine these two types of models, Mike and Brian participate in an experiment. They are

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
TutorJosh Chamberlain College Of Nursing
Ver perfil
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
337
Miembro desde
1 año
Número de seguidores
16
Documentos
28454
Última venta
1 día hace
Tutor Joshua

Here You will find all Documents and Package Deals Offered By Tutor Joshua.

3.6

53 reseñas

5
18
4
14
3
12
2
0
1
9

Recientemente visto por ti

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes