• ¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis
  • Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron
  • Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
  • Leer en línea o como PDF
Vender
¿Dónde estudias?
Tu idioma
Document preview thumbnail
Vista previa 3 fuera de 18 páginas
Examen

Procurement Final Exam - Study Guide with Complete Solutions

Document preview thumbnail
Vista previa 3 fuera de 18 páginas

Procurement Final Exam - Study Guide with Complete Solutions

Vista previa del contenido

Procurement Final Exam - Study
Guide with Complete Solutions
-Strategic considerations - eg. US military preparedness.

-Government regulations - e.g. MWBE commitments.

-Single supplier's production capacity may be limited.

-Opportunity to test a new supplier with trial orders.

-Volatility in the supply market makes single sourcing unacceptably risky.

(Note: MWBE stands for Minority Women in Business).

12: Arguments in favor of Single Sourcing Strategy: - ANSWER--EXCLUSIVITY: The
supplier may be the sole source.
(patent protection, exclusive distributorship).

-Outstanding quality or service --> value

-Order too small to split.

-Opportunities for discounts or lower freight costs.

-May receive more attention if only one supplier involved.

-Set-up costs for duplicate suppliers would be prohibitive.

-Easier to schedule deliveries.

-JIT production or stockless buying arrangements.

-Prefer to focus attention on one, not multiple suppliers.

-Prerequisite to key partnering status.

12: Key questions for supplier selection and sourcing strategy: - ANSWER--Single
source or multiple sources?

-Short term or long term contracts?

-Buy direct from a manufacturer or through a distributor? (Sometimes you don't have a
choice)

,-Does supplier size matter - large, medium or small?

-Is geographical location a factor to consider?

-Utilize only domestic, or also foreign suppliers?

-Expect close working relationships or arm's length?

12: Level 1 Strategic Criteria: Supply Risks and Spend Categories: - ANSWER-For
better example go to slide 7.

12: Level 2 and 3 Traditional Criteria: Evaluation of Potential Supply Sources:

MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE AND FINANCIAL STABILITY: - ANSWER--Mission,
goals, planning, corporate culture, values.
-Organization structure and decision-making.

-Customer focused / quality focused

-Management controls, information systems, policies and procedures, e-commerce
capability

-Qualifications and background of key managers

-Financial condition (ex. annual reports, D&B's)

-Financial ratios (ex. liquidity, profitability, debt and activity)

12: Level 2 and 3 Traditional Criteria: Evaluation of Potential Supply Sources:

PRODUCTION PROCESS AND TECHNICAL CAPABILITY: - ANSWER--Previous
experience and accomplishments.

-Completed projects (talk to past customers).

-Utilization of quality processes and systems.

-Engineering, design and technical strengths.

-Capacity and flexibility to meet demand (lead time).

-Employee qualifications and capabilities.

-ISO 9000 / ISO 14000 certifications.

, -Availability and quality of technical support.

-Evaluation of samples obtained from supplier.

-Visit to supplier's facility by cross-functional team.

12: Level 3 - 10 Potential Supplier Evaluation Criteria (R. Monczka):

1) MANAGEMENT CAPABILITY: - ANSWER--Does long range planning exist?
Mission / vision?

-Is turnover high among managers?

-Professional / educational background of key managers?

-Is management customer-focused?

-History or labor / management relations?

-Is management investing in the business and its people?

-Does management practice TQM and continuous improvement?

12: Level 3 - 10 Potential Supplier Evaluation Criteria (R. Monczka):

10) LONGER TERM RELATIONSHIP POTENTIAL: - ANSWER--Does the potential
exist to move beyond the traditional arms length purchasing relationship?

-How early in the design process is the supplier willing or able to participate?

-What is unique about the supplier's contributions?

-Is there an interest in joint problem solving and process improvement?

-Is there an atmosphere which promotes free and open communication?

-What is the commitment of both top managements?

12: Level 3 - 10 Potential Supplier Evaluation Criteria (R. Monczka):

2) EMPLOYEE CAPABILITIES: - ANSWER--Are employees committed to TQM and
continuous improvement?

-How are employee / management relations?

-Is employee morale high?

Información del documento

Subido en
26 de septiembre de 2025
Número de páginas
18
Escrito en
2025/2026
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas
$12.99

¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis Dentro de los 14 días posteriores a la compra y antes de descargarlo, puedes elegir otro documento. Puedes gastar el importe de nuevo.
Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Leer en línea o como PDF

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
LUCKYSTAR2022
3.5
(163)
Vendido
929
Seguidores
726
Artículos
9655
Última venta
2 días hace



Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes