=
SOLUTION MANUAL
The Legal Environment of Business, 14th Edition
by Roger E. Meiners, Verified Chapters 1 - 22
The Legal Environment of Business, 14th Edition
, =
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter 1. Today’s Business Environment: Law and Ethics
Chapter 2. The Court Systems
Chapter 3. Trials and Resolving Disputes
Chapter 4. The Constitution: Focus on Application to Business
Chapter 5. Criminal Law and Business
Chapter 6. Elements of Torts
Chapter 7. Business Torts and Product Liability
Chapter 8. Real and Personal Property
Chapter 9. Intellectual Property
Chapter 10. Contracts
Chapter 11. Domestic and International Sales
Chapter 12. Business Organizations
Chapter 13. Negotiable Instruments, Credit, and Bankruptcy
Chapter 14. Agency and the Employment Relationship
Chapter 15. Employment and Labor Regulations
Chapter 16. Employment Discrimination
Chapter 17. The Regulatory Process
Chapter 18. Securities Regulation
The Legal Environment of Business, 14th Edition
, =
Chapter 19. Consumer Protection
Chapter 20. Antitrust Law
Chapter 21. Environmental Law
Chapter 22. The International Legal Environment of Business
CHAPTER 1
Table of Contents
Answer to Discussion Question .................................................................................1
Answers to Case Questions........................................................................................1
Answers to Ethics and Social Questions ...................................................................3
Answer to Discussion Question
Should the common law maxim “Ignorance of the law is no excuse” apply to an
immigrant who speaks little English and was not educated in the United States?
How about for a tourist who does not speak English? Everyone knows criminal
acts are prohibited, but what about subtler rules that differ across countries and
so may be misunderstood by foreigners?
Answer: It is generally true that ignorance of the law is no excuse. Citizens are
deemed to have constructive knowledge of the law. Yet, as well known as this
rule is, it is surprising how often it is proffered as an excuse. (A Westlaw
search cases finds hundreds of examples). Examples include: Deluco v. Dezi
(Conn. Super) (lack of knowledge regarding the state‘s usury laws is no
excuse for the inclusion of an illegal interest rate in a sales contract); and
Plumlee v. Paddock (ignorance of the fact that the subject matter of the
contract was illegal was not excuse). The courts have provided a small
exception to the rule when it comes to people in lack of English language
skills. Consider Flanery v. Kuska, (defendant did not speak English was
advised by a friend that an answer to a complaint was not required); Ramon v.
Dept. of Transportation, (no English and an inability to understand the law
required for an excuse); Yurechko v. County of Allegheny, (Ignorance and with
the fact that the municipality suffered no hardship in late lawsuit filing was an
The Legal Environment of Business, 14th Edition
, =
excuse).
Answers to Case Questions
1. Facts from an English judge’s decision in 1884: “The crew of an English yacht
were cast away in
a storm on the high seas . . . and were compelled to put into an open boat.
................................................................................................... They had no
supply
of water and no supply of food. . . . That on the eighteenth day . . . they
............................................................................................... suggested that one
should be sacrificed to save the rest. . . . That next day . . . they . . . went to the
boy .........................................................................................................put a knife
into his throat and killed him . . . the three men fed upon the body of the boy for
four days; [then]
the boat was picked up by a passing vessel, and [they] were rescued. . . . and
committed for trial. . . .
if the men had not fed upon the body of the boy they would probably not
have survived to be so picked up and rescued, but would have died of
famine. The boy, being in a much weaker
condition, was likely to have died before them The real question in this case [is]
whether killing
under the conditions set forth be or be not murder.” Do you consider the acts
to be immoral?
[Regina v. Dudley and Stephens, 14 Queens Bench Division 273 (1884)]
Answer: This points out that the legal system has limits. Its acceptability is
dictated by legal culture--which determines whether law will be enforced,
obeyed, avoided, or abused. It is limited by the informal rules of the society--
its customs and values. One limit is the extent to which society will allow the
formal rules to be imposed when a crime is committed in odd circumstances.
Here there was an intentional murder. Does the motive for the murder, the
effort to save several lives by sacrificing one
The Legal Environment of Business, 14th Edition
SOLUTION MANUAL
The Legal Environment of Business, 14th Edition
by Roger E. Meiners, Verified Chapters 1 - 22
The Legal Environment of Business, 14th Edition
, =
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter 1. Today’s Business Environment: Law and Ethics
Chapter 2. The Court Systems
Chapter 3. Trials and Resolving Disputes
Chapter 4. The Constitution: Focus on Application to Business
Chapter 5. Criminal Law and Business
Chapter 6. Elements of Torts
Chapter 7. Business Torts and Product Liability
Chapter 8. Real and Personal Property
Chapter 9. Intellectual Property
Chapter 10. Contracts
Chapter 11. Domestic and International Sales
Chapter 12. Business Organizations
Chapter 13. Negotiable Instruments, Credit, and Bankruptcy
Chapter 14. Agency and the Employment Relationship
Chapter 15. Employment and Labor Regulations
Chapter 16. Employment Discrimination
Chapter 17. The Regulatory Process
Chapter 18. Securities Regulation
The Legal Environment of Business, 14th Edition
, =
Chapter 19. Consumer Protection
Chapter 20. Antitrust Law
Chapter 21. Environmental Law
Chapter 22. The International Legal Environment of Business
CHAPTER 1
Table of Contents
Answer to Discussion Question .................................................................................1
Answers to Case Questions........................................................................................1
Answers to Ethics and Social Questions ...................................................................3
Answer to Discussion Question
Should the common law maxim “Ignorance of the law is no excuse” apply to an
immigrant who speaks little English and was not educated in the United States?
How about for a tourist who does not speak English? Everyone knows criminal
acts are prohibited, but what about subtler rules that differ across countries and
so may be misunderstood by foreigners?
Answer: It is generally true that ignorance of the law is no excuse. Citizens are
deemed to have constructive knowledge of the law. Yet, as well known as this
rule is, it is surprising how often it is proffered as an excuse. (A Westlaw
search cases finds hundreds of examples). Examples include: Deluco v. Dezi
(Conn. Super) (lack of knowledge regarding the state‘s usury laws is no
excuse for the inclusion of an illegal interest rate in a sales contract); and
Plumlee v. Paddock (ignorance of the fact that the subject matter of the
contract was illegal was not excuse). The courts have provided a small
exception to the rule when it comes to people in lack of English language
skills. Consider Flanery v. Kuska, (defendant did not speak English was
advised by a friend that an answer to a complaint was not required); Ramon v.
Dept. of Transportation, (no English and an inability to understand the law
required for an excuse); Yurechko v. County of Allegheny, (Ignorance and with
the fact that the municipality suffered no hardship in late lawsuit filing was an
The Legal Environment of Business, 14th Edition
, =
excuse).
Answers to Case Questions
1. Facts from an English judge’s decision in 1884: “The crew of an English yacht
were cast away in
a storm on the high seas . . . and were compelled to put into an open boat.
................................................................................................... They had no
supply
of water and no supply of food. . . . That on the eighteenth day . . . they
............................................................................................... suggested that one
should be sacrificed to save the rest. . . . That next day . . . they . . . went to the
boy .........................................................................................................put a knife
into his throat and killed him . . . the three men fed upon the body of the boy for
four days; [then]
the boat was picked up by a passing vessel, and [they] were rescued. . . . and
committed for trial. . . .
if the men had not fed upon the body of the boy they would probably not
have survived to be so picked up and rescued, but would have died of
famine. The boy, being in a much weaker
condition, was likely to have died before them The real question in this case [is]
whether killing
under the conditions set forth be or be not murder.” Do you consider the acts
to be immoral?
[Regina v. Dudley and Stephens, 14 Queens Bench Division 273 (1884)]
Answer: This points out that the legal system has limits. Its acceptability is
dictated by legal culture--which determines whether law will be enforced,
obeyed, avoided, or abused. It is limited by the informal rules of the society--
its customs and values. One limit is the extent to which society will allow the
formal rules to be imposed when a crime is committed in odd circumstances.
Here there was an intentional murder. Does the motive for the murder, the
effort to save several lives by sacrificing one
The Legal Environment of Business, 14th Edition
