100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Examen

FUR2601 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2025 - DUE September 2025

Puntuación
-
Vendido
-
Páginas
9
Grado
A+
Subido en
05-09-2025
Escrito en
2025/2026

In respect of each of the four different scenarios below, you are required to consider whether they constitute fair discrimination; unfair discrimination; or another appropriate word/phrase or concept. Justify and explain your answer by addressing each of the four points below relating to each individual scenario: 1. Which of the following laws (if at all or more than one) is applicable in each scenario? (i) The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, Act 200 of 1993; (ii) The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996; (iii) The Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998; (iv) The Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of 2000; 2. Does the aggrieved person(s) have standing (locus standi)? 3. Which court(s) has jurisdiction to adjudicate/decide the matter? 4. What remedies would be appropriate? Scenario 1: As a woman, there are a few words and phrases I hear about myself: “Aggressive”, for going after a promotion. “Controlling,” when I made household decisions. “Crazy,” by someone who didn’t like my attitude. “Difficult,” when I asked for more money when I had been contracted to perform a certain assignment. “Bitchy,” when I turned down another person’s idea. “Emotional” for raising my voice. “Hysterical” for getting angry, and a “stalker” for being persistent.1 Scenario 2: Caster Semenya is a person born with differences of sexual development (DSD). She is prohibited from competing in international sports activities with other women unless she takes medication to reduce her testosterone levels. Scenario 3: In recounting the Treason Trial during March 1960, Nelson Mandela referred to an incident where Justice Kennedy, a white man fluent in isiZulu responded with the words ‘Sinjalo thina maZulu’ (We Zulus are like that) in reference to one of Dr Wilson Conco’s medical achievements.2 Scenario 4: Michael was born male but has always identified as female. They began the process of gender reassignment about a year ago but has not told anyone about this. Recently she came to work dressed in a skirt, high heels, wearing make-up and a wig and informed everyone that they should be addressed as Michelle. Michelle was told to go home and change as she was embarrassing other staff members and clients. QUESTION 2 (8 marks) Discuss whether the statement below is true by relying on relevant authority, such as provisions of the law; reference to the prescribed study material;3 and case law. “Anyone seeking primary health care at any governmental medical facility in South Africa is required to produce their South African Identity Document. If the person does not possess a South Africa Identity Document, they are turned away from the facility, regardless of the circumstances”.

Mostrar más Leer menos
Institución
Grado









Ups! No podemos cargar tu documento ahora. Inténtalo de nuevo o contacta con soporte.

Escuela, estudio y materia

Institución
Grado

Información del documento

Subido en
5 de septiembre de 2025
Número de páginas
9
Escrito en
2025/2026
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas

Temas

Vista previa del contenido

FUR2601 Assignment 2
(COMPLETE ANSWERS)
Semester 2 2025 - DUE
September 2025

For assistance contact
Email:

, Scenario 1
This scenario describes unfair discrimination based on gender. The words and phrases used
against the woman are gender stereotypes that unfairly prejudice her, hindering her career and
personal interactions. These behaviors create a hostile environment and demonstrate
discriminatory practices.
1. Applicable Law: The Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair
Discrimination Act 4 of 2000 (PEPUDA) is the most directly applicable law. PEPUDA
prohibits unfair discrimination on the basis of gender, which includes gender-based
stereotypes. The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, also applies, as
the right to equality and human dignity (Sections 9 and 10) are being violated.
2. Standing (Locus Standi): Yes, the aggrieved person has locus standi (standing) to bring
a claim, as they are the direct victim of the alleged discrimination.
3. Jurisdiction: The Equality Court would have jurisdiction to hear this matter. Equality
Courts are a specialized forum established under PEPUDA to address unfair
discrimination.
4. Remedies: Appropriate remedies could include an interdict to stop the discriminatory
behavior, an order for the payment of damages for harm suffered, an order for a public
apology or a formal undertaking from the perpetrators, and an order compelling the
perpetrators to attend sensitivity training.


Scenario 2
This scenario constitutes unfair discrimination. While the stated purpose is to ensure fair
competition, the blanket prohibition and requirement for Caster Semenya to medically alter her
body to compete is seen as an unfair and discriminatory practice based on a person's biological
characteristics. It is a form of discrimination on the grounds of gender and biological difference
(differences of sexual development).
1. Applicable Law: The Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair
Discrimination Act 4 of 2000 (PEPUDA) is the primary applicable law, as it prohibits
unfair discrimination on the basis of gender, sex, and disability (DSDs can be viewed in
this context). The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 (Section 9) also
applies, as it guarantees the right to equality and prohibits unfair discrimination.
2. Standing (Locus Standi): Yes, Caster Semenya has locus standi as she is the direct
subject of the discriminatory rule.
$2.50
Accede al documento completo:

100% de satisfacción garantizada
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Tanto en línea como en PDF
No estas atado a nada

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
kalangulawendy Teachme2-tutor
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
25
Miembro desde
1 año
Número de seguidores
0
Documentos
131
Última venta
2 meses hace

3.8

5 reseñas

5
1
4
2
3
2
2
0
1
0

Recientemente visto por ti

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes