HMDVA81
Assignment 5 2025
Unique Number:
Due Date: August 2025
QUESTION 1
The most suitable data collection strategy for this study is qualitative data collection,
particularly participatory qualitative methods such as focus group discussions (FGDs), in-
depth interviews, and participant observation.
Reasons for Choosing a Qualitative Strategy
1. Co-production of Knowledge
The study focuses on co-producing knowledge with local actors, which means the
participants are not just respondents but active contributors to the research.
Qualitative methods like FGDs allow for open dialogue and mutual learning between
researchers and community members, making it easier to explore local experiences,
beliefs, and ideas around gender-based violence in depth.
2. Exploring Social Realities
Gender-based violence (GBV) is a sensitive and complex social issue that involves
emotional, cultural, and power dynamics. Qualitative data collection helps to uncover
Terms and
hidden narratives and deeper social meanings behind the experiences of victims of use
By making use of this document you agree to:
community members—something that quantitative
Use this document as a guide forsurveys might miss.
learning, comparison and reference purpose,
Terms of use
Not to duplicate, reproduce and/or misrepresent the contents of this document as your own work,
By making use of this document you agree to:
Use this document
Fully accept the consequences
solely as a guide forshould you plagiarise
learning, reference,or and
misuse this document.
comparison purposes,
Ensure originality of your own work, and fully accept the consequences should you plagiarise or misuse this document.
Comply with all relevant standards, guidelines, regulations, and legislation governing academic and written work.
Disclaimer
Great care has been taken in the preparation of this document; however, the contents are provided "as is" without any express or
implied representations or warranties. The author accepts no responsibility or liability for any actions taken based on the
information contained within this document. This document is intended solely for comparison, research, and reference purposes.
Reproduction, resale, or transmission of any part of this document, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited.
, +27 67 171 1739
QUESTION 1
The most suitable data collection strategy for this study is qualitative data collection,
particularly participatory qualitative methods such as focus group discussions
(FGDs), in-depth interviews, and participant observation.
Reasons for Choosing a Qualitative Strategy
1. Co-production of Knowledge
The study focuses on co-producing knowledge with local actors, which means
the participants are not just respondents but active contributors to the
research. Qualitative methods like FGDs allow for open dialogue and mutual
learning between researchers and community members, making it easier to
explore local experiences, beliefs, and ideas around gender-based violence in
depth.
2. Exploring Social Realities
Gender-based violence (GBV) is a sensitive and complex social issue that
involves emotional, cultural, and power dynamics. Qualitative data collection
helps to uncover hidden narratives and deeper social meanings behind the
experiences of victims and community members—something that quantitative
surveys might miss.
3. Context-Specific Understanding
The use of qualitative methods allows the study to focus on contextual
knowledge, shaped by local culture, norms, and lived realities of the
Gqeberha community. This is especially useful in building advocacy strategies
that are meaningful and locally grounded.
Description of the Data Collection Strategy
Focus Group Discussions (FGDs)
FGDs will involve small groups (6–10 people) facilitated by a skilled moderator who
will guide participants through discussions on the causes, consequences, and
prevention of GBV. Participants may include community leaders, survivors, health
workers, youth, and activists. The collective nature of FGDs encourages participants
Disclaimer
Great care has been taken in the preparation of this document; however, the contents are provided "as is"
without any express or implied representations or warranties. The author accepts no responsibility or
liability for any actions taken based on the information contained within this document. This document is
intended solely for comparison, research, and reference purposes. Reproduction, resale, or transmission
of any part of this document, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited.
Assignment 5 2025
Unique Number:
Due Date: August 2025
QUESTION 1
The most suitable data collection strategy for this study is qualitative data collection,
particularly participatory qualitative methods such as focus group discussions (FGDs), in-
depth interviews, and participant observation.
Reasons for Choosing a Qualitative Strategy
1. Co-production of Knowledge
The study focuses on co-producing knowledge with local actors, which means the
participants are not just respondents but active contributors to the research.
Qualitative methods like FGDs allow for open dialogue and mutual learning between
researchers and community members, making it easier to explore local experiences,
beliefs, and ideas around gender-based violence in depth.
2. Exploring Social Realities
Gender-based violence (GBV) is a sensitive and complex social issue that involves
emotional, cultural, and power dynamics. Qualitative data collection helps to uncover
Terms and
hidden narratives and deeper social meanings behind the experiences of victims of use
By making use of this document you agree to:
community members—something that quantitative
Use this document as a guide forsurveys might miss.
learning, comparison and reference purpose,
Terms of use
Not to duplicate, reproduce and/or misrepresent the contents of this document as your own work,
By making use of this document you agree to:
Use this document
Fully accept the consequences
solely as a guide forshould you plagiarise
learning, reference,or and
misuse this document.
comparison purposes,
Ensure originality of your own work, and fully accept the consequences should you plagiarise or misuse this document.
Comply with all relevant standards, guidelines, regulations, and legislation governing academic and written work.
Disclaimer
Great care has been taken in the preparation of this document; however, the contents are provided "as is" without any express or
implied representations or warranties. The author accepts no responsibility or liability for any actions taken based on the
information contained within this document. This document is intended solely for comparison, research, and reference purposes.
Reproduction, resale, or transmission of any part of this document, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited.
, +27 67 171 1739
QUESTION 1
The most suitable data collection strategy for this study is qualitative data collection,
particularly participatory qualitative methods such as focus group discussions
(FGDs), in-depth interviews, and participant observation.
Reasons for Choosing a Qualitative Strategy
1. Co-production of Knowledge
The study focuses on co-producing knowledge with local actors, which means
the participants are not just respondents but active contributors to the
research. Qualitative methods like FGDs allow for open dialogue and mutual
learning between researchers and community members, making it easier to
explore local experiences, beliefs, and ideas around gender-based violence in
depth.
2. Exploring Social Realities
Gender-based violence (GBV) is a sensitive and complex social issue that
involves emotional, cultural, and power dynamics. Qualitative data collection
helps to uncover hidden narratives and deeper social meanings behind the
experiences of victims and community members—something that quantitative
surveys might miss.
3. Context-Specific Understanding
The use of qualitative methods allows the study to focus on contextual
knowledge, shaped by local culture, norms, and lived realities of the
Gqeberha community. This is especially useful in building advocacy strategies
that are meaningful and locally grounded.
Description of the Data Collection Strategy
Focus Group Discussions (FGDs)
FGDs will involve small groups (6–10 people) facilitated by a skilled moderator who
will guide participants through discussions on the causes, consequences, and
prevention of GBV. Participants may include community leaders, survivors, health
workers, youth, and activists. The collective nature of FGDs encourages participants
Disclaimer
Great care has been taken in the preparation of this document; however, the contents are provided "as is"
without any express or implied representations or warranties. The author accepts no responsibility or
liability for any actions taken based on the information contained within this document. This document is
intended solely for comparison, research, and reference purposes. Reproduction, resale, or transmission
of any part of this document, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited.
