Task 2
A1. The students were very effective during this task, and their strongest area was the keywords.
The class had an accuracy of 75%. This assessment led to five of the students missing one
question out of the five students. Three of them have learning impairments/disabilities. The
impairments could have been a key factor in the students choosing the wrong answer during the
assessment.
A2. The most noticeable problem was the constructed response during the solution part of the
assessment. Out of 20 students, only four could answer the questions correctly and accurately.
The score is 20% proficiency for the class.
B. A change I would make would be in the anticipatory set of the lesson plan. The students need
a note section area to help them stay engaged during the lesson. Using the note section will also
help the students become more organized while retaining the information.
C1. During the lesson plan, an area of strength was the informal formative assessment, which
used signal words. This was an effective and efficient way to see students' accuracy and
knowledge. During this assessment, there was an 85% accuracy, all SD learners had an accuracy
of 67%, and the English Learners met proficiency as well during the assessment.
, Carmen Cooley Task 2
Professor Davis
February 18, 2025
C2. An area within the lesson plan that had a problem would be the informal formative
assessment in the solutions section. The section only had 55% proficiency. This was not high
enough and needed to be changed to something with higher accuracy since this is the solutions
section.
D. The class as a whole did improve in accuracy and proficiency. The class scores are
progressing exceptionally well since only four students were proficient, and now there are eight.
The number of SD and El students who were proficient did not change. One student that
improved and increased their proficiency score was student number 4. One student who
decreased was student number 8. This student dropped from proficient to not proficient in the
solutions' sections.
D1. The class did see an improvement in their scores, and I am grateful for that and proud of
them for improving. I also would say to my students that even if they did not receive the score
they wanted, there is always room for improvement. As for student number 4, I would pull them
aside and let them know their score did improve and what areas within my lesson helped them be
successful. I would also talk with student number 8 and let them know that their score went
down but not to be discouraged so that we can work together on improving next time and how I,
as a teacher, can help them be more successful next time.
A1. The students were very effective during this task, and their strongest area was the keywords.
The class had an accuracy of 75%. This assessment led to five of the students missing one
question out of the five students. Three of them have learning impairments/disabilities. The
impairments could have been a key factor in the students choosing the wrong answer during the
assessment.
A2. The most noticeable problem was the constructed response during the solution part of the
assessment. Out of 20 students, only four could answer the questions correctly and accurately.
The score is 20% proficiency for the class.
B. A change I would make would be in the anticipatory set of the lesson plan. The students need
a note section area to help them stay engaged during the lesson. Using the note section will also
help the students become more organized while retaining the information.
C1. During the lesson plan, an area of strength was the informal formative assessment, which
used signal words. This was an effective and efficient way to see students' accuracy and
knowledge. During this assessment, there was an 85% accuracy, all SD learners had an accuracy
of 67%, and the English Learners met proficiency as well during the assessment.
, Carmen Cooley Task 2
Professor Davis
February 18, 2025
C2. An area within the lesson plan that had a problem would be the informal formative
assessment in the solutions section. The section only had 55% proficiency. This was not high
enough and needed to be changed to something with higher accuracy since this is the solutions
section.
D. The class as a whole did improve in accuracy and proficiency. The class scores are
progressing exceptionally well since only four students were proficient, and now there are eight.
The number of SD and El students who were proficient did not change. One student that
improved and increased their proficiency score was student number 4. One student who
decreased was student number 8. This student dropped from proficient to not proficient in the
solutions' sections.
D1. The class did see an improvement in their scores, and I am grateful for that and proud of
them for improving. I also would say to my students that even if they did not receive the score
they wanted, there is always room for improvement. As for student number 4, I would pull them
aside and let them know their score did improve and what areas within my lesson helped them be
successful. I would also talk with student number 8 and let them know that their score went
down but not to be discouraged so that we can work together on improving next time and how I,
as a teacher, can help them be more successful next time.
