1 of 107
Definition
A. Ambassadors and foreign ministers, are totally immune from arrests
for any crime, and their their families, servants and staff have varying
levels of immunity.
B. Foreign consuls are not cloaked with diplomatic immunity.
C. Witnesses under subpoena are privileged from arrest, except for
felonies, treason or breach of the peace misdemeanors while attending
,or traveling to, or from, court per A.R.S. §12-2213
D. National Guard members are immune from arrest for all offenses
except felonies while traveling to, from or attending military drills or
duty per A.R.S. §26-166(A).
Give this one a try later!
The scope of the following right
CHAPTER 6 - CLASSIFICATION OF
protected by the 6th Amendment of
OFFENSES (P.O. 2.1.11)
the U.S. Constitution (P.O. 2.10.4K-O)
persons who are immune from
Civil rights violations as per 18 U.S.C.
arrest as per Article 4, Part 2,
§§241 and 242 and 42 U.S.C. §1983.
Section 6 of the Arizona
(P.O. 2.12.4)
Constitution. (P.O. 2.2.19)
Don't know?
2 of 107
Definition
https://quizlet.com/398122780/prpa-juvenile-law-and-procedures-28-
flash-cards/
Give this one a try later!
, For Juvenile Proceedings (P.O. Examples of the following search
2.8), click on the following link... concepts per case law. (P.O. 2.3.3)
A.R.S. §13-609 - Offenses Committed
Following purposes for offering
in a School
evidence in court (P.O. 2.4.3)
Safety Zone (P.O. 2.1.13)
Don't know?
3 of 107
Definition
1. There is probable cause to believe that a felony has been committed
by the person to be arrested.
2. There is probable cause to believe that the person to be arrested
has been involved in an accident,
there was a criminal violation of Title 28 and such criminal violation
occurred just prior to, or immediately following, such traffic accident.
3. There is probable cause to believe a misdemeanor
or petty offense has been committed by the person to be arrested.
Give this one a try later!
Conditions under which a lawful
Jurisdiction and primary responsibility
search with a warrant may be made
of each of the following courts in the
per A.R.S. §§13-3916 and 13-3917 (P.O.
Arizona court system. (P.O. 2.7.3)
2.3.1)
, An instance where
Conditions under which an
"probable cause" for police action
officer may make a lawful arrest
may or may not exist, identify if
without a warrant as per A.R.S.
probable cause exists to search
§13-3883. (P.O. 2.2.17)
consistent. (P.O. 2.3.6)
Don't know?
4 of 107
Definition
1. Person acting under "color of law." Student handout.
2. Deprives any inhabitant of a right guaranteed under the Constitution
or under certain laws of the United
States.
3. Basis of liability - the officer knew, or should have
known, that the action would violate the constitutional rights of the
person, or the officer acted with malicious intent to deprive a person
of constitutional rights or to injure.
4. Agency policy or custom - liability of the agency
may also be based on an adopted agency policy or
custom. The theory is that the agency's actions
"caused" the employee to act in a particular
manner. This theory of liability is often advanced in
cases arising under 42 U.S.C. §1983, as it is the
primary was that plaintiffs can reach the "deep
pockets" of the employer.
Definition
A. Ambassadors and foreign ministers, are totally immune from arrests
for any crime, and their their families, servants and staff have varying
levels of immunity.
B. Foreign consuls are not cloaked with diplomatic immunity.
C. Witnesses under subpoena are privileged from arrest, except for
felonies, treason or breach of the peace misdemeanors while attending
,or traveling to, or from, court per A.R.S. §12-2213
D. National Guard members are immune from arrest for all offenses
except felonies while traveling to, from or attending military drills or
duty per A.R.S. §26-166(A).
Give this one a try later!
The scope of the following right
CHAPTER 6 - CLASSIFICATION OF
protected by the 6th Amendment of
OFFENSES (P.O. 2.1.11)
the U.S. Constitution (P.O. 2.10.4K-O)
persons who are immune from
Civil rights violations as per 18 U.S.C.
arrest as per Article 4, Part 2,
§§241 and 242 and 42 U.S.C. §1983.
Section 6 of the Arizona
(P.O. 2.12.4)
Constitution. (P.O. 2.2.19)
Don't know?
2 of 107
Definition
https://quizlet.com/398122780/prpa-juvenile-law-and-procedures-28-
flash-cards/
Give this one a try later!
, For Juvenile Proceedings (P.O. Examples of the following search
2.8), click on the following link... concepts per case law. (P.O. 2.3.3)
A.R.S. §13-609 - Offenses Committed
Following purposes for offering
in a School
evidence in court (P.O. 2.4.3)
Safety Zone (P.O. 2.1.13)
Don't know?
3 of 107
Definition
1. There is probable cause to believe that a felony has been committed
by the person to be arrested.
2. There is probable cause to believe that the person to be arrested
has been involved in an accident,
there was a criminal violation of Title 28 and such criminal violation
occurred just prior to, or immediately following, such traffic accident.
3. There is probable cause to believe a misdemeanor
or petty offense has been committed by the person to be arrested.
Give this one a try later!
Conditions under which a lawful
Jurisdiction and primary responsibility
search with a warrant may be made
of each of the following courts in the
per A.R.S. §§13-3916 and 13-3917 (P.O.
Arizona court system. (P.O. 2.7.3)
2.3.1)
, An instance where
Conditions under which an
"probable cause" for police action
officer may make a lawful arrest
may or may not exist, identify if
without a warrant as per A.R.S.
probable cause exists to search
§13-3883. (P.O. 2.2.17)
consistent. (P.O. 2.3.6)
Don't know?
4 of 107
Definition
1. Person acting under "color of law." Student handout.
2. Deprives any inhabitant of a right guaranteed under the Constitution
or under certain laws of the United
States.
3. Basis of liability - the officer knew, or should have
known, that the action would violate the constitutional rights of the
person, or the officer acted with malicious intent to deprive a person
of constitutional rights or to injure.
4. Agency policy or custom - liability of the agency
may also be based on an adopted agency policy or
custom. The theory is that the agency's actions
"caused" the employee to act in a particular
manner. This theory of liability is often advanced in
cases arising under 42 U.S.C. §1983, as it is the
primary was that plaintiffs can reach the "deep
pockets" of the employer.
