Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Leer en línea o como PDF ¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Examen

JRN 430 final exam review answers

Puntuación
-
Vendido
-
Páginas
7
Grado
A+
Subido en
17-10-2024
Escrito en
2024/2025

JRN 430 final exam review answers Unsigned opinion of a court is calledper curiam opinion Courts of appealEstablish precedent Laws are well-tailored when theyAre not vague or overboard Statutes may be enacted by legislaturesAt the state, the federal or local level Among the three branches of government, the executive isCo-equal Of the amendments proposed to the U.S. ConstitutionA few of them have been approved or ratified Stare decisis meansLet the decision stand An action taken by the government to prohibit publication of a specific document or text is distributed to the public; a policy that requires government approval before publicationPrior restraint In Near v. Minnesota, the Supreme Court ruled thatPrior restraints pose a serious threat of censorship, laws that punish past actions by banning future publications are a form of prior restraint, prior restraints may be legal when necessary to serve an extremely important government interest (A, B and D)

Mostrar más Leer menos
Institución
JRN 430
Grado
JRN 430

Vista previa del contenido

JRN 430 Mid-Term answers
5 Elements to prove libel✔✔1. Defamation 2. Falsity 3. Identification 4. Harm 5.
Publication

Actual Malice✔✔knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for the truth

Libel Defenses✔✔- Truth
- Wire Service
- Statute of Limitations
- Neutral Reportage
- Opinion
- Consent
- Fair Comment & Criticism
- Summary Judgement

SLAPP lawsuits✔✔Lawsuits whose purpose is to harass critics into silence, often to
suppress those critics' First Amendment rights.

Libel per se✔✔Libel on its face; obvious

Libel per quod✔✔Not obvious; assemble pieces

Types of Damages in Libel Suits✔✔Actual damages (compensation)
Assumed damages (court assumes reputation was ruined but plaintiff can't prove
actual damage)
Punitive damages (punish defense)

Burden of Proof for public person✔✔actual malice

burden of proof for private person✔✔negligence

O'Brien Test✔✔A 4-part test used to determine whether govt. regulation on symbolic
speech is constitutional. 1. Is regulation within constitutional power of govt.? 2. Does
regulation further substantial govt. interest? 3. Is govt. interest unrelated to
suppression of free expression? 4. Is incidental restriction of expression no greater
than needed?....if all YES, regulation IS constitutional. So, O'Brien did not have right
to burn draft card.

John Peter Zenger✔✔New York publisher who was taken to court for criticizing the
governor of New York. Defended it by saying what he published was TRUE via
Andrew Hamilton.

libel tourism✔✔the act of suing a writer for alleged defamation in a foreign
jurisdiction where there are weaker libel laws

Times when Prior Restraint is justified✔✔1. Movement of Troop Ships (National
Security)

, 2. Clear and Present Danger
3. Obscenity

Tort✔✔Case of civil action (Ex: libel)

Lowest Court✔✔District

Middle Court✔✔Court of Appeals

Highest Court✔✔Supreme Court

Lowest court(s) in Michigan✔✔Circuit and District

Legislative Branch✔✔Senate (100 members) and House of Representatives (435
members)

Judicial Branch✔✔Supreme Court

Executive Branch✔✔President, Vice President, Cabinet

What branch can be F.O.I.A'd?✔✔Executive Branch ONLY

1st Amendment Rights✔✔Freedom of Religion, Speech, Press, Assembly, and
Petition

Criminal Speech✔✔Child Pornography

Aeropagitica (1644)✔✔John Milton. Est. Open Marketplace of Ideas (term actually
coined by Justice Holmes)

Abrams v. US✔✔Defendant's criticism of US involvement with WWI not protected by
first amendment, bc it advocated a strike and violent overthrow of government.
(These r the WW1 protests that started presenting issues with 1st
Amendment/freedom of expression)

commercial speech✔✔Advertisements and commercials for products and services;
they receive less First Amendment protection, primarily to discourage false and
misleading ads.

Levels of Scrutiny✔✔rational basis, intermediate scrutiny, strict scrutiny

Balancing Test✔✔The view of the majority of the Supreme Court that First
Amendment rights must be weighed against the competing needs of the community
to preserve order.

Nulla poena sine lege✔✔No punishment without law

Escuela, estudio y materia

Institución
JRN 430
Grado
JRN 430

Información del documento

Subido en
17 de octubre de 2024
Número de páginas
7
Escrito en
2024/2025
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas

Temas

$8.49
Accede al documento completo:

¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis Dentro de los 14 días posteriores a la compra y antes de descargarlo, puedes elegir otro documento. Puedes gastar el importe de nuevo.
Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Leer en línea o como PDF

Conoce al vendedor
Seller avatar
ExamZen

Documento también disponible en un lote

Thumbnail
Package deal
JRN 430 Quiz 2 and answers PACKAGE
-
9 2024
$ 30.95 Más información

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
ExamZen Liberty University
Ver perfil
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
16
Miembro desde
1 año
Número de seguidores
3
Documentos
539
Última venta
1 mes hace

0.0

0 reseñas

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes