Assignment Feedback 2023-24
BA Education Culture and Society
Name: Ummi Kamali Student No: 33690085 Year group: 3
Module name: THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL
NEEDS: GLOBAL CONTEXTS AND INCLUSIVE APPROACHES
Title of assignment: Autism – Communication Identity
General comments
Points for future development
Grading criteria
80- 100% EXCEPTIONAL 70-79% EXCELLENT 60-69% VERY GOOD 50-59% GOOD
A mark in this range represents the A mark in this range A mark in this range A mark in this range
overall achievement of the course represents the overall represents the overall represents the overall
learning outcomes at an exceptionally achievement of the course achievement of the achievement of the
accomplished level. There is evidence learning outcomes to an course learning course learning outcomes
of a widely extensive range of scholarly outstanding level. There is outcomes to a very good to a good level. There is
reading, a highly detailed and accurate evidence of an extensive range level. There is evidence evidence of reading from
knowledge of key concepts and of scholarly reading and a of reading from a wide a range of sources,
theories and an exceptional grasp of all considerably detailed and range of sources, a fairly knowledge of key
the issues raised by the question. This accurate knowledge of key detailed and accurate concepts and theories and
knowledge will be presented with an concepts and theories and a knowledge of key recognition of significant
outstanding level of critical analysis and full grasp of issues raised by concepts and theories implications in the
a truly original, creative approach to the question. Knowledge will and a clear question, although these
the question demonstrating be presented with a high understanding of issues may not be fully
exceptional independence of thought. degree of critical analysis and raised by the question, developed through
The work is very well organised. an original approach to the which will be developed detailed discussion. The
Arguments and analysis of reading will question, demonstrating and discussed. The work work is well organised.
display a high degree of reasoning and independence of thought. The is well organised. A Discussion and
be outstandingly clear, critical, well- work is very well organised. carefully developed conclusions are grounded
focused and cogent. Written in fluent Arguments and analysis will argument is advanced in engagement with
style with correct scholarly demonstrate sound reasoning which demonstrates that reading, showing
procedures. and be clear, critical, well- relevant literature has understanding and
focused and cogent. Written in been understood, reflection, but not
fluent style with correct assimilated and critically consistent critical
scholarly procedures. evaluated to reach well evaluation. Clearly written
substantiated with scholarly procedures
conclusions. Well written mostly correct.
with correct scholarly
procedures.
, 40-49% PASS 25-39% FAIL 10-24% BAD 1-9& VERY BAD
FAIL FAIL
A mark in this range represents the A mark in this range represents A mark in this range A submission that does not
overall achievement of the course an overall failure to achieve the represents a significant attempt to address the
learning outcomes to a satisfactory course learning outcomes. overall failure to course learning
level. There is inconsistency in the There is poor or no knowledge achieve the course outcomes.
detail and accuracy of reading and of reading and little or no learning outcomes. It shall be deemed a non-
limited understanding of key concepts understanding of key concepts There is no evidence of valid attempt and must be
and theories or issues raised by the and theories. The work lacks an attempt to address re-sat.
question. The work lacks clear structure structure, focus and coherence. the question, but it
and focus. There is an attempt to There is lack of detail and little shall be deemed a valid
answer the question although there is evidence of an attempt to attempt.
little or no critical evaluation. address the question.
Sometimes lacking clarity of written Sometimes lacking clarity of
style with scholarly procedures mostly written style and/or incorrect
employed correctly. scholarly procedures.
Non-submission or plagiarised assessment 0 %
Mark:
First marker:
Date:
Second marker (if appropriate):
Date:
Please note that this grade is only provisional and subject to ratification by the Board
Autism – Communication Identity
Introduction:
In this essay, I will be focusing on my chosen neurotype of autism. Autism is a
neurodevelopmental difference that affects a person’s social, communicational skills or
behaviour patterns which is seen as a human difference. I will first define neurodiversity and
BA Education Culture and Society
Name: Ummi Kamali Student No: 33690085 Year group: 3
Module name: THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL
NEEDS: GLOBAL CONTEXTS AND INCLUSIVE APPROACHES
Title of assignment: Autism – Communication Identity
General comments
Points for future development
Grading criteria
80- 100% EXCEPTIONAL 70-79% EXCELLENT 60-69% VERY GOOD 50-59% GOOD
A mark in this range represents the A mark in this range A mark in this range A mark in this range
overall achievement of the course represents the overall represents the overall represents the overall
learning outcomes at an exceptionally achievement of the course achievement of the achievement of the
accomplished level. There is evidence learning outcomes to an course learning course learning outcomes
of a widely extensive range of scholarly outstanding level. There is outcomes to a very good to a good level. There is
reading, a highly detailed and accurate evidence of an extensive range level. There is evidence evidence of reading from
knowledge of key concepts and of scholarly reading and a of reading from a wide a range of sources,
theories and an exceptional grasp of all considerably detailed and range of sources, a fairly knowledge of key
the issues raised by the question. This accurate knowledge of key detailed and accurate concepts and theories and
knowledge will be presented with an concepts and theories and a knowledge of key recognition of significant
outstanding level of critical analysis and full grasp of issues raised by concepts and theories implications in the
a truly original, creative approach to the question. Knowledge will and a clear question, although these
the question demonstrating be presented with a high understanding of issues may not be fully
exceptional independence of thought. degree of critical analysis and raised by the question, developed through
The work is very well organised. an original approach to the which will be developed detailed discussion. The
Arguments and analysis of reading will question, demonstrating and discussed. The work work is well organised.
display a high degree of reasoning and independence of thought. The is well organised. A Discussion and
be outstandingly clear, critical, well- work is very well organised. carefully developed conclusions are grounded
focused and cogent. Written in fluent Arguments and analysis will argument is advanced in engagement with
style with correct scholarly demonstrate sound reasoning which demonstrates that reading, showing
procedures. and be clear, critical, well- relevant literature has understanding and
focused and cogent. Written in been understood, reflection, but not
fluent style with correct assimilated and critically consistent critical
scholarly procedures. evaluated to reach well evaluation. Clearly written
substantiated with scholarly procedures
conclusions. Well written mostly correct.
with correct scholarly
procedures.
, 40-49% PASS 25-39% FAIL 10-24% BAD 1-9& VERY BAD
FAIL FAIL
A mark in this range represents the A mark in this range represents A mark in this range A submission that does not
overall achievement of the course an overall failure to achieve the represents a significant attempt to address the
learning outcomes to a satisfactory course learning outcomes. overall failure to course learning
level. There is inconsistency in the There is poor or no knowledge achieve the course outcomes.
detail and accuracy of reading and of reading and little or no learning outcomes. It shall be deemed a non-
limited understanding of key concepts understanding of key concepts There is no evidence of valid attempt and must be
and theories or issues raised by the and theories. The work lacks an attempt to address re-sat.
question. The work lacks clear structure structure, focus and coherence. the question, but it
and focus. There is an attempt to There is lack of detail and little shall be deemed a valid
answer the question although there is evidence of an attempt to attempt.
little or no critical evaluation. address the question.
Sometimes lacking clarity of written Sometimes lacking clarity of
style with scholarly procedures mostly written style and/or incorrect
employed correctly. scholarly procedures.
Non-submission or plagiarised assessment 0 %
Mark:
First marker:
Date:
Second marker (if appropriate):
Date:
Please note that this grade is only provisional and subject to ratification by the Board
Autism – Communication Identity
Introduction:
In this essay, I will be focusing on my chosen neurotype of autism. Autism is a
neurodevelopmental difference that affects a person’s social, communicational skills or
behaviour patterns which is seen as a human difference. I will first define neurodiversity and
