ormity a Lype pci▇ ▇ deged as a change un beuep or bend
n response to reaLO tmaged "2 c k p esIuIe
y s n mi▇
thternalsat bni ▇ a graup. deo ▇ cas convLnce an indivdu ▇
chane the i teina and pubuc be e .
eg)radicaLsatLon
e ) Jonestwon CuLt wnere 13member comm ▇ mas3suicLcte ▇ ▇g
cya de
eq) 5S NatL commanders
d en catL'on when a perKan conp ims lh a gtou ba ecl on the op cn
and Na s f the gr up thaL the ndiv cluacan iden i y Ln
pubuE beha LDuIs of an indv tua cuIe cha g d
nar au i ternal bewep change aL the peISon may nc agree wLn ail ofthe
group noims
eg) Sbungs and Iendish▇ ae exLremiSea ▇ rac ▇
eg) instagr m putnes ate
pmp nnce wun en an indi duai may change theur pubue behaMoutS o
go a Gng ththe maj ▇
individuas ter na▇ epsare no ▇ ▇
eq) SooED haG ganism.
e ) mLabeha Lng u cLas
e ) tten dlu q Hile 1 le
,oS /03720
p a i n ny my
maELVe sac Ltn luence CNSD i5 wn en human haue hene d to De wKed
indi Clua Que concerned w n noims ancL ty c behaMIGuLS G the majorhy
incLividuas wo d ra her gan .soc a appt vaL Chan appear J oush and be
eje Cted
NSĘ1 urey to happen w h familar pecpie as theie i an ncreaed coAc
Lbour gaini appi va op p endis
NSI can. occurin stLessp l siuab as pes e ha ea giecEer ne ea por
ocLa Supp Wnen ie▇
emanona prac ea5 s. NSi based on an▇ be WKed and acc epted
by cners.
porma Lbna sac I uence Is1)45 wn en human ▇ ▇ the need to be ugh ▇
ndi uas g a cng lththe maj ▇ L they are conteined wLn
ppea ng ght
iSL y to occur un an ambigu us ituanLon wuhen wE 1L uncIe Lto. the
civitua hat▇ ▇▇ ▇she gicu regarded as
e per
cog itivé pi ces as 1SE n baied ca wnas the indi dual thiic
r tn pi
iemenstrates chat no manLve soci t p enceauo accAs beyond the
a cia aborat▇ ▇
Schuitł et a G003) gathered aaca Iem many hoce owera week nere
cms se wher eontI or permen▇
guesES ieanciom ▇ auoca ▇ Ioo
cGnd ELcn
centi IGamı had a ccor hanger in m g p uncipan the enviroome/
ben ti –reu▇ to ▇
expeiumenta condiach , had aadiaena ma▇ scanng ▇
gues s. chose to 1eule owelseach day
, Q3/03/1022
Aguests receiving a message containing noimanut infoimancn abut cther
guests reduced sheu need faifilh towel by15Lin companion to
snowed that they hack contaimed
in cider to pit ins wun the peicelved
endivdual differences in_nomative macinL ipluence>
h has shown that peopie cuffer in how much they want to bc ured
nAfFilLatars are pecpie wino place grear emphasis on being uxed by ciners
2 tney have a greater need for being in aielanchship with ciners
¾ conformint is cauied for same pecpie moie than crners due 1o the difference
among peapies socialintennons to be liked by diners
^ demonstrates indivdual diffeience the way peopie Le-pond to
majority
? the efae, ASI explanaton for confoimlyy cannot be used to understand
genenc social beho miour
the (S due to the emotionaL differences among peapie thas have been found
informatianal and namatie socin influence work togesher
Tucks assumed chat people conjomm due to NSI OLIS1
¾ reseaich suggesns that confjoimity is often an interacuo of boch processes
there is no clear distinction betwer the twam iab expenmentss
Linerefore, this Leduces Support