100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Examen

mcq_hmpyc80_research_methodology_questions_answers_and_feedback..pd

Puntuación
-
Vendido
-
Páginas
8
Grado
A+
Subido en
18-07-2022
Escrito en
2021/2022

ASSIGNMENT 01 UNIQUE NUMBER: DUE DATE: 24 March 2022 For this assignment, you need to read the following article and answer the questions. The article can be found under Prescribed reading folder. Tsele M “Rights and religion; bias and beliefs: Can a judge speak God?” (2018) 43 (1) Journal for Juridical Sciences 1 – 25. 1. Give a concise summary of the author's viewpoint. Make sure you concentrate on legal philosophy and not so much legislation. (Max word count 200.) (5) Tsele deliberates the relationship and apparent tension between a Judge’s duty to apply the law in a fair and impartial manner and his or her own personal right to freedom of religion, and the extent to which those religious views might influence a Judge in the adjudication of disputes. 1 According to Tsele, ‘this dictum illustrates that the limitation to Judges expressing their social views is narrowly interpreted and will, in most instances, be limited to situations that involve the adjudication of cases’.2 Certainly, what should be clear on a conspectus of all of the above is that a Judge is a citizen, entitled to hold religious views and entitled to freely express him or herself so long as it does not compromise the discharge of his or her judicial duties. 1 Tsele M “Rights and religion; bias and beliefs: Can a judge speak God?” (2018) 43 (1) Journal for Juridical Sciences 1- 25. 2 Tsele M “Rights and religion; bias and beliefs: Can a judge speak God?” (2018) 43 (1) Journal for Juridical Sciences page 9. Downloaded by: mapasekanakene25 | Distribution of this document is illegal This study source was downloaded by from CourseH on :06:24 GMT -05:00 S - The study-notes marketplace Accordingly, where a Judge holds views, religious or otherwise, this does not, without more, constitute partiality, inherently compromising their ability to adjudicate disputes or their ability to discharge their judicial functions.3 2. What theory of interpretation that you have studied is addressed in the article? Why do you say this? You need to identify the theory you have studied that is most closely associated with the author's viewpoint. (Max word count 500.) (10) Legal positivism is a philosophy of law that emphasizes the conventional nature of law— that it is socially constructed. The word “positivism” was probably first used to draw attention to the idea that law is “positive” or “posited,” as opposed to being “natural” in the sense of being derived from natural law or morality. According to legal positivism, law is synonymous with positive norms, that is, norms made by the legislator or considered as common law or case law. Formal criteria of law’s origin, law enforcement and legal effectiveness are all sufficient for social norms to be considered law. Legal positivism does not base law on divine commandments, reason, or human rights. As an historical matter, positivism arose in opposition to classical natural law theory, according to which there are necessary moral constraints on the content of law. Legal positivism does not imply an ethical justification for the content of the law, nor a decision for or against the obedience to law. Positivists do not judge laws by questions of justice or humanity, but merely by the ways in which the laws have been created. This includes the view that judges make new law in deciding cases not falling clearly under a legal rule. Practising, deciding or tolerat

Mostrar más Leer menos
Institución
Grado









Ups! No podemos cargar tu documento ahora. Inténtalo de nuevo o contacta con soporte.

Escuela, estudio y materia

Institución
Grado

Información del documento

Subido en
18 de julio de 2022
Número de páginas
8
Escrito en
2021/2022
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas

Temas

Vista previa del contenido

Assignmnet 1 mcq hmpyc80
research methodology questions,
answers and feedback.

written by

salmaankhan1




www.stuvia.com

This study source was downloaded by 100000849517029 from CourseHero.com on 07-03-2022 20:27:28 GMT -05:00
Downloaded by: Keenha |
Distribution of this document is illegal
https://www.coursehero.com/file/151230582/Stuvia-1579122-assignmnet-1-mcq-hmpyc80-research-methodology-questions-answers-and-feedbackpdf/

, Stuvia.com - The study-notes marketplace




Chapter 1

1. The study of how knowledge, reality and our existence as human beings evoke questions

about who we are, what we know and how we experience the world around us is known as ...

1) ontology.

2) paradigm.

3) philosophy.

4) epistemology.

The correct answer is option 3: philosophy, as indicated in the textbook on page 4. Philosophy is the
study of how knowledge, reality and our existence as human beings evoke questions about who we
are, what we know and how we experience the world around us.

Ontology refers to the construction of a meaningful reality. It is the philosophical study of the nature
of reality, i.e. the very nature of things. The ontological dimension of social research refers to the
researcher’s views on the nature of reality. Important question we should ask then is: How do I see
social reality? The answer lies in basic ontological perceptions of objectivism, interpretivism or
pragmatism.

Epistemology is widely understood as the study of knowledge (Sorensen, 2017). Epistemology is
defined as the study of knowledge of reality. Epistemological frameworks can be placed on a
continuum from positivism to postpositivism to constructivism (Fouché et al., 2021, p. 9)

Philosophies are underpinned by a particular paradigm. However, the concept of a paradigm is
somewhat contested and is described in many different ways by various authors and in different
contexts. Thomas Kuhn defined a paradigm in sociology, philosophy and the sciences as "denoting a
certain way of doing something; an example or pattern that establishes a 'disciplinary matrix [or] the
practices that define a scientific discipline at a certain point in time' (Kuhn, 1970, p. 182). For the
purposes of this context, we will define a paradigm as a construct that represents an archetype of
how professions achieve what they set out to do at a particular point in time. As such, a paradigm
prescribes what is acceptable within a community of practice or profession (Bertram & Christensen,
2019). "Inherent to the description of a paradigm, however, is that it is likely to change when the
members of a community of practitioners within a particular profession deem it fit to change, and
this (in Kuhnian terms) constitutes a paradigm shift." (Fouché et al., 2021, p. 5).

"It is important to note, however, that terminology is not used consistently by authors across the
literature and can be quite disorientating for even the most experienced researchers. Several
researchers and scholars in the field advise us not to get caught up in the concepts, as much as the
meanings at different conceptual levels. All these terms represent distinct hierarchical levels of
decision making within the research process. A researcher will hold certain views – personally and
professionally – about the world and evidence within that might develop from religious, indigenous,
feminist, socialist or capitalist beliefs and values." (Fouché et al., 2021, p. 6).



2. This underpins philosophies and denotes a certain way of doing something; it is an example

or pattern that establishes a “disciplinary matrix [or] the practices that define a scientific




This study source was downloaded by 100000849517029 from CourseHero.com on 07-03-2022 20:27:28 GMT -05:00
Downloaded by: Keenha |
Distribution of this document is illegal
https://www.coursehero.com/file/151230582/Stuvia-1579122-assignmnet-1-mcq-hmpyc80-research-methodology-questions-answers-and-feedbackpdf/
$3.50
Accede al documento completo:

100% de satisfacción garantizada
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Tanto en línea como en PDF
No estas atado a nada

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
SMARTDOCS Cambridge University
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
29
Miembro desde
3 año
Número de seguidores
27
Documentos
144
Última venta
1 año hace
SmartDocs

Latest exam pack questions and answers and summarized notes for exam preparation. for assistance. All the best on your exams!! Thanks for visiting my store !!

3.7

7 reseñas

5
3
4
1
3
2
2
0
1
1

Recientemente visto por ti

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes