ANALYSIS OF APPARENT IDEA OF OBSOLUTE OWNERSHIP WHEN
MEASURED AGAINST THE RIGHTS OF THE HOLDER OF HABITATIO IN
SOUTH AFRICAN LAW
By
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
(XXXXXXXXXXXXXX) Student no
Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the LLB degree
BACHELOR OF LAWS (LLB)
, In the
SCHOOL OF LAW
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA
DEPARTMENT OF PRIVATE LAW
RRLLB81 ASSIGNMENT 02
UNIQUE NUMBER: XXXXXXXXX
MR LC COETZEE
2021
ACADEMIC HONESTY DECLARATION
1. I understand what academic dishonesty entails and am aware of Unisa’s policies
in this regard.
2. I declare that this assignment is my own, original work. Where I have used
someone else’s work, I have indicated this by using the prescribed style of
referencing. Every contribution to, and quotation in, this assignment from the work
or works of other people has been referenced according to the prescribed style.
3. I have not allowed, and will not allow, anyone to copy my work with the intention of
passing it off as his or her own work.
4. I did not make use of another student’s work and submit it as my own.
NAME:
, ………………………………………………………………….………………….
SIGNATURE:
………………………………………………………………….………………….
STUDENT NUMBER:
………………………………………………………………….………………….
MODULE CODE: RRLLB81
DATE: …………………………………………………………….…………….
TOPIC SELECTED: OWNERSHIP VERSUS THE RIGHT TO HABITATION IN
EVICTION APPLICATIONS
………………………………………………………………….………………….
MARK RECEIVED FOR ASSIGNMENT 01: NOT YET PROCESSED…..
MARK RECEIVED FOR ASSIGNMENT: …………………………………..
ABSTRACT
The weighing of ownership against the rights of habitatio holder caused confusions
and controversies in the law of property for quite a long time. It seems like the most
vital issue which needs clarity is concerned with the question whether ownership
should be given preference over the right to habitation or verse versa. In other
MEASURED AGAINST THE RIGHTS OF THE HOLDER OF HABITATIO IN
SOUTH AFRICAN LAW
By
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
(XXXXXXXXXXXXXX) Student no
Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the LLB degree
BACHELOR OF LAWS (LLB)
, In the
SCHOOL OF LAW
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA
DEPARTMENT OF PRIVATE LAW
RRLLB81 ASSIGNMENT 02
UNIQUE NUMBER: XXXXXXXXX
MR LC COETZEE
2021
ACADEMIC HONESTY DECLARATION
1. I understand what academic dishonesty entails and am aware of Unisa’s policies
in this regard.
2. I declare that this assignment is my own, original work. Where I have used
someone else’s work, I have indicated this by using the prescribed style of
referencing. Every contribution to, and quotation in, this assignment from the work
or works of other people has been referenced according to the prescribed style.
3. I have not allowed, and will not allow, anyone to copy my work with the intention of
passing it off as his or her own work.
4. I did not make use of another student’s work and submit it as my own.
NAME:
, ………………………………………………………………….………………….
SIGNATURE:
………………………………………………………………….………………….
STUDENT NUMBER:
………………………………………………………………….………………….
MODULE CODE: RRLLB81
DATE: …………………………………………………………….…………….
TOPIC SELECTED: OWNERSHIP VERSUS THE RIGHT TO HABITATION IN
EVICTION APPLICATIONS
………………………………………………………………….………………….
MARK RECEIVED FOR ASSIGNMENT 01: NOT YET PROCESSED…..
MARK RECEIVED FOR ASSIGNMENT: …………………………………..
ABSTRACT
The weighing of ownership against the rights of habitatio holder caused confusions
and controversies in the law of property for quite a long time. It seems like the most
vital issue which needs clarity is concerned with the question whether ownership
should be given preference over the right to habitation or verse versa. In other
