• ¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis
  • Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron
  • Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
  • Leer en línea o como PDF
Vender
¿Dónde estudias?
Tu idioma
Document preview thumbnail
Vista previa 4 fuera de 41 páginas
Examen

HCD FINAL Questions with Correct Solutions

Document preview thumbnail
Vista previa 4 fuera de 41 páginas

HCD FINAL Questions with Correct Solutions

Vista previa del contenido

HCD FINAL Questions with Correct Solutions


Question:
1. 5 preventable adverse events

Answer:
errors of commission errors of omission errors of communication errors of context diagnostic
errors


Question:
2. Metacognition: This unconscious, automatic style relies on intuition and pattern
recognition to make quick decisions. It is susceptible to many unconscious biases and
cognitive errors.

Answer:
system 1 (fast) thinking


Question:
3. Metacognition: Analytical, deliberate and resource intense is less prone to error but can be
exhaustive and less efficient.

Answer:
system 2 (slow) thinking


Question:
4. What type of bias: (anchoring/ascertainment/availability/confirmation/diagnostic
momentum-bandwagon/framing/search satisfying-premature) giving weight + reliance on
initial info/impression, and not adjusting from this despite availability of new info. "Jumping to
conclusion" can cause missed/delayed dx

Answer:
anchoring


Question:
5. What type of bias: (anchoring/ascertainment/availability/confirmation/diagnostic
momentum-bandwagon/framing/search satisfying-premature) shaping decision-making based
on prior expectations. "Frequent flyers" w recurrent complaints can affect decision making

Answer:
ascertainment

,Question:
6. What type of bias: (anchoring/ascertainment/availability/confirmation/diagnostic
momentum-bandwagon/framing/search satisfying-premature) judging likelihood of a dx based
on the ease with which examples can be retrieved (more familiar, common, recent,
memorable) (dx a pt w a common condition like flu and not considering rare ones)

Answer:
availability


Question:
7. What type of bias: (anchoring/ascertainment/availability/confirmation) selectively
noticing/seeking info that confirms opinion/impressions versus seeking info that disconfirms.
Evidence in support/beliefs is given more weight

Answer:
confirmation


Question:
8. What type of bias: (anchoring/ascertainment/availability/confirmation/diagnostic
momentum-bandwagon/framing/search satisfying-premature) once a label (dx) has been
assigned, momentum takes hold and reduces ability to consider other alternatives. Can affect
future work up of pt and how handoffs are "framed"

Answer:
diagnostic


Question:
9. What type of bias: (anchoring/ascertainment/availability/confirmation/diagnostic
momentum-bandwagon/framing/search satisfying-premature) how information is presented,
and how a question is framed can impact future decisions. Source of info and context can
influence

Answer:
framing


Question:
10. What type of bias: (anchoring/ascertainment/availability/confirmation/diagnostic
momentum-bandwagon/framing/search satisfying-premature) crease looking for
findings/signals once something has been identified. Accepting a diagnosis before considering
all information and verifying diagnosis

Answer:
search

,Question:
11. 3 factors that predispose to cognitive errors

Answer:
person factors (cognitive loading = too many activities, fatigue, affective considerations) pt
factors (complex presentations, lack of complete hx) system factors (workflow, time
limitations, bad transfer of info, poor technology, poor teamwork)


Question:
12. 4 ways to prevent mitigation of errors

Answer:
improve personal knowledge/awareness of cognitive bias improve professional
reasoning/critical thinking enhance work conditions and design give organizational culture


Question:
13. institute of medicines 6 aims for improvement!

Answer:
safe effective patient-centered timely efficient equitable


Question:
14. Acknowledgment of the high-risk nature of an organization's activities and the
determination to achieve consistently safe operations =

Answer:
culture of safety


Question:
15. when to use swiss cheese model

Answer:
active failures + latent conditions


Question:
16. 7 steps of error response

Answer:
pt safety reporting systems investigation communication + disclosure apology + remediation
system improvement data tracking + performance eval education + training


Question:
17. finding the root cause of a problem (5 whys)

, Answer:
1. get group who are familiar with problem
2. define problem in clear language
3. define problem as pattern, not just an isolated event
4. ask why 5 times till u find root cause
5. explore way to solve prob and make changes to make sure it doesnt happen again


Question:
18. action hierarchy (5)

Answer:
1. review statements + contributing factors
2. for each statement, brainstorm actions to mitigate recurrence
3. rank strengths of actions (strong = less human reliance, weak = more human reliance)
4. present RCAA process results and rec to leaders to approve
5. assign tasks with timelines and methods to check implementation


Question:
19. 4 steps to making a reliable process

Answer:
segment visualization of flow (flow chart) standardize + simplify process develop backup plan


Question:
20. the ______ tool prompts teams to review, eval, record the following: steps in process,
failure modes, failure causes, failure effects

Answer:
FMEA


Question:
21. what is involved w huddles (5)

Answer:
safety + quality concerns/success of past day safety + quality issues for pts on todays
schedule review of tracked issues input on other safety/quality issues announcementss/info


Question:
22. if an error occurred, the next step is (2)

Answer:
tell pt explain what will be done to prevent future events (RCAA, policy change, education,
new equiptment)

Información del documento

Subido en
25 de octubre de 2026
Número de páginas
41
Escrito en
2026/2027
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas
$9.99

¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis Dentro de los 14 días posteriores a la compra y antes de descargarlo, puedes elegir otro documento. Puedes gastar el importe de nuevo.
Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Leer en línea o como PDF

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
VictorGrades
5.0
(1)
Vendido
25
Seguidores
0
Artículos
2765
Última venta
2 semanas hace



Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes