• ¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis
  • Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron
  • Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
  • Leer en línea o como PDF
Vender
¿Dónde estudias?
Tu idioma
Document preview thumbnail
Vista previa 4 fuera de 37 páginas
Examen

Wgu D385 Software Security And Testing Python Secure-Coding Practice Workbook Exercises And Capstones| Instant Download

Document preview thumbnail
Vista previa 4 fuera de 37 páginas

This workbook gives you 40 Python secure-coding exercises and 4 capstones for WGU D385. Each question has four options, a keyed answer, and a clear rationale. Topics include SSTI, XSS, SQL injection, command injection, password hashing, secure deserialization, AES-GCM, secrets, file uploads, and CI/CD security testing. Use it to practice exam-style scenarios and spot distractors.

Vista previa del contenido

ENGV 380 Final Exam Project &
Construction Management Questions
& Answers Liberty University 2026
Updated | Verified Questions
ENGV 380 Final Exam Project & Construction | Comprehensive
Examination
ENGV 380 Final Exam Project & Construction Management
Questions & Answers Liberty University 2026 Updated actual
exam preparation document with verified questions, complete




INTRODUCTION
This document is an important and very helpful preparation
resource for ENGV 380 Final Exam Project & Construction
Management Questions & Answers Liberty University 2026
Updated. Every item uses a focused exam stem, four response
options, a keyed response, and a clear rationale, making it
easier to understand the subject, spot distractors, and build real
exam confidence.




Page 1

, Question 1
A contractor is choosing between a lump-sum and a cost-plus-fee contract for a
project with high scope uncertainty. Which delivery/contract pairing best
aligns incentives and risk?
A. Lump-sum with a guaranteed maximum price (GMP) and shared
savings.
B. Cost-plus-fee with an open-book audit clause and no cap.
C. Unit-price contract with re-measured quantities.
D. Design-build with a fixed fee and no contingency.
Correct Answer: A - Lump-sum with a guaranteed maximum
price (GMP) and shared savings.


RATIONALE
A GMP with shared savings transfers cost-overrun risk to the
contractor while allowing owner participation in savings, balancing
incentives under uncertainty. Pure cost-plus lacks cost discipline;
unit-price requires well-defined quantities; fixed-fee design-build
without contingency is unrealistic for high uncertainty.

Question 2
A 6-activity CPM network has two critical paths. Activity X (critical) is
delayed 5 days due to owner changes. What is the most likely contractual
outcome under standard AIA A201?
A. No time extension because another critical path exists.
B. Time extension of 5 days and possibly cost compensation.
C. Time extension of 2.5 days (shared float).
D. Contractor bears the delay as a concurrent delay.
Correct Answer: B - Time extension of 5 days and possibly cost
compensation.




Page 2

, RATIONALE
A delay to any critical path extends project duration, so the contractor
is entitled to a time extension; owner-caused changes also support cost
compensation. Float is not shared unless the contract says so;
concurrent delay requires independent parallel delay, not merely
multiple critical paths.

Question 3
In a design-build project, the owner wants to retain control over aesthetic
finishes while transferring performance risk. Which contract mechanism best
achieves this?
A. Prescriptive specification with owner-approved samples.
B. Performance specification with a design review board.
C. Bridging documents with a separate architect.
D. Turnkey with no owner involvement.
Correct Answer: B - Performance specification with a design
review board.


RATIONALE
A performance specification transfers performance risk to the
design-builder while a design review board lets the owner influence
aesthetics. Prescriptive specs shift design risk back to the owner;
bridging splits responsibility; turnkey with no involvement forfeits
aesthetic control.

Question 4
A project has a 30% chance of a $500,000 delay claim and a 60% chance of a
$100,000 productivity loss. What is the expected monetary value (EMV) of
these risks?
A. $210,000
B. $150,000
C. $260,000


Page 3

, D. $180,000


Correct Answer: A - $210,000


RATIONALE
EMV = (0.30 × $500,000) + (0.60 × $100,000) = $150,000 + $60,000
= $210,000. Other values reflect arithmetic errors or misapplied
probabilities.

Question 5
Under a standard AIA A201-2017, which situation most clearly constitutes a
'concealed or unknown condition' warranting an equitable adjustment?
A. Differing site conditions not reasonably foreseeable from a site visit.
B. Owner's failure to provide timely permits.
C. Contractor's underestimation of labor productivity.
D. Abnormal weather exceeding historical averages.
Correct Answer: A - Differing site conditions not reasonably
foreseeable from a site visit.


RATIONALE
A201 addresses concealed or unknown physical conditions differing
materially from those indicated, supporting an equitable adjustment.
Permit delays are owner-caused schedule issues; labor
underestimation is contractor risk; abnormal weather is typically a
time extension, not a concealed condition.

Question 6
A contractor's safety program shows a total recordable incident rate (TRIR) of
4.2 versus the industry average of 3.0. Which leading indicator most directly
addresses the gap?
A. Increase post-incident drug testing.
B. Implement daily pre-task hazard analysis and near-miss reporting.
C. Purchase additional workers' compensation insurance.


Page 4

Información del documento

Subido en
29 de septiembre de 2026
Número de páginas
37
Escrito en
2026/2027
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas
$30.00

¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis Dentro de los 14 días posteriores a la compra y antes de descargarlo, puedes elegir otro documento. Puedes gastar el importe de nuevo.
Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Leer en línea o como PDF

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
GoldenExams
4.4
(74)
Vendido
81
Seguidores
20
Artículos
11448
Última venta
1 día hace



Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes