• ¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis
  • Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron
  • Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
  • Leer en línea o como PDF
Vender
¿Dónde estudias?
Tu idioma
Document preview thumbnail
Vista previa 4 fuera de 87 páginas
Examen

UTA NURS 5333 TEST 1 EXAM UPDATE VERIFIED QUESTIONS AND CORRECT ANSWERS WITH RATIONALES| INSTANT DOWNLOAD

Document preview thumbnail
Vista previa 4 fuera de 87 páginas

Practice questions with answers and rationales for UTA NURS 5333 Test 1. Covers heart failure drugs like sacubitril/valsartan, warfarin interactions, metformin in kidney disease, therapeutic index, antidepressants, aspirin prevention, hyperkalemia, cirrhosis dosing, asthma controllers, and sepsis vasopressors. Use it to review key pharmacology concepts and check your reasoning before the exam.

Vista previa del contenido

, Question 1
A patient with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is initiated
on sacubitril/valsartan. Which mechanism best explains why this agent must
not be co-administered with an ACE inhibitor within 36 hours?
A. Additive bradykinin accumulation from dual neprilysin and ACE
inhibition increases angioedema risk.
B. Sacubitril inhibits ACE, leading to unopposed angiotensin II effects
and hypertension.
C. Valsartan blocks AT1 receptors, causing reflex tachycardia that negates
sacubitril's benefit.
D. Combined therapy reduces renal perfusion by inhibiting prostaglandin
synthesis.
Correct Answer: A - Additive bradykinin accumulation from
dual neprilysin and ACE inhibition increases angioedema risk.


RATIONALE
Sacubitril inhibits neprilysin, which degrades bradykinin; concurrent
ACE inhibition also raises bradykinin, markedly increasing
angioedema risk. Option B is false because sacubitril does not inhibit
ACE. Option C is incorrect because reflex tachycardia is not the
primary concern and valsartan does not negate sacubitril's benefit.
Option D is unrelated; prostaglandin synthesis is not the mechanism.

Question 2
Which pathophysiologic alteration best explains the development of
hyperkalemia in a patient with metabolic acidosis and insulin deficiency?
A. Increased renal potassium excretion due to aldosterone excess
B. Extracellular shift of potassium via H+/K+ exchange and reduced
cellular uptake
C. Enhanced sodium-potassium ATPase activity driving potassium
intracellularly
D. Decreased gastrointestinal potassium absorption


Page 2

,Correct Answer: B - Extracellular shift of potassium via H+/K+

exchange and reduced cellular uptake




RATIONALE
In acidosis, hydrogen ions move into cells in exchange for potassium
moving out; insulin deficiency further impairs cellular potassium
uptake, causing hyperkalemia. Option A is wrong because aldosterone
excess would lower potassium. Option C would lower serum
potassium. Option D does not cause hyperkalemia; reduced GI
absorption would lower potassium.

Question 3
A patient on warfarin for atrial fibrillation is prescribed
trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for a urinary tract infection. Which
pharmacokinetic interaction is most likely to occur?
A. Induction of CYP2C9, decreasing INR and thromboembolic risk
B. Inhibition of CYP2C9, increasing INR and bleeding risk
C. Increased renal clearance of warfarin, reducing its effect
D. Displacement from albumin without altering free drug concentration
Correct Answer: B - Inhibition of CYP2C9, increasing INR and
bleeding risk


RATIONALE
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole inhibits CYP2C9, the enzyme
metabolizing S-warfarin, leading to increased INR and bleeding risk.
Option A is incorrect because induction would decrease INR. Option
C is wrong; renal clearance is not the primary mechanism. Option D is
incorrect because displacement alone does not usually cause a
sustained increase in free drug unless metabolism is also inhibited.




Page 3

, Question 4
A patient with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease (eGFR 32
mL/min/1.73 m²) is on metformin. Which action is most appropriate according
to current FDA labeling and clinical guidelines?
A. Continue metformin at current dose with routine monitoring.
B. Discontinue metformin and initiate an SGLT2 inhibitor.
C. Reduce metformin dose by 50% and recheck eGFR in 3 months.
D. Switch to a sulfonylurea due to renal safety.
Correct Answer: B - Discontinue metformin and initiate an
SGLT2 inhibitor.


RATIONALE
Metformin is contraindicated when eGFR is below 30 mL/min/1.73
m² and should not be initiated; at eGFR 32, many guidelines
recommend discontinuation or dose reduction, but an SGLT2 inhibitor
is preferred for renal and cardiovascular protection. Option A is
unsafe. Option C is not aligned with current recommendations. Option
D is less optimal because sulfonylureas risk hypoglycemia in CKD.

Question 5
Which statement best describes the concept of 'therapeutic index' and its
clinical implication for prescribing?
A. A high therapeutic index indicates a narrow margin between
therapeutic and toxic doses.
B. A low therapeutic index requires routine therapeutic drug monitoring
to avoid toxicity.
C. Therapeutic index is calculated as the median toxic dose divided by
the median effective dose.
D. Drugs with a low therapeutic index are safer because they have fewer
side effects.
Correct Answer: B - A low therapeutic index requires routine


Page 4

Información del documento

Subido en
24 de septiembre de 2026
Número de páginas
87
Escrito en
2026/2027
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas
$28.00

¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis Dentro de los 14 días posteriores a la compra y antes de descargarlo, puedes elegir otro documento. Puedes gastar el importe de nuevo.
Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Leer en línea o como PDF

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
CaseStudyPro
3.9
(12)
Vendido
43
Seguidores
0
Artículos
1216
Última venta
7 horas hace



Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes