Latest LSAC Guidelines A (1)
Updated Questions and Verified Answers | 100 Questions | 100% VERIFIED
Introduction
The Law School Admission Test (LSAT) evaluates the reasoning and reading skills essential
for success in law school and for legal analysis. This comprehensive assessment spans eight
core domains: Logical Reasoning and Argument Evaluation; Analytical Reasoning and Logic
Games; Reading Comprehension and Passage Analysis; Deductive and Inductive Reasoning;
Flaw Identification and Assumption Recognition; Legal Reasoning and Rule Application;
Critical Thinking and Inference Generation; and Synthesis of Complex Information. Each
question that follows targets a distinct sub-topic within this blueprint. Mastery of these
domains supports law school admission and builds the legal reasoning execution and
professional judgment required for the study and application of law.
1. Pedestrians who cross at midblock are far more likely to be struck by cars than
those who cross at marked crosswalks. City officials should therefore install more
marked crosswalks in busy commercial districts. After all, pedestrian safety is a core
municipal responsibility.
A. Pedestrians who cross at midblock are more likely to be struck than those using
crosswalks.
B. Pedestrian safety is a core municipal responsibility.
C. Commercial districts have more pedestrians than residential areas.
D. City officials should install more marked crosswalks in busy commercial districts.
Correct Answer: D. City officials should install more marked crosswalks in busy
commercial districts.
Rationale: The main conclusion is the recommendation that the city should install more
crosswalks. The other statements are premises offered in support, and the last option is
not stated in the argument.
2. Economists claim that raising the minimum wage always reduces employment.
However, several studies of cities that raised their minimum wage found no
significant reduction in employment. Thus, the economists' claim is too broad.
A. It is the main conclusion of the argument.
B. It restates the economists' claim.
C. It is evidence offered against the economists' claim.
D. It is a claim the argument ultimately endorses as its final position.
Correct Answer: C. It is evidence offered against the economists' claim.
, Rationale: The studies serve as evidence against the economists' claim, supporting the
conclusion that the claim is too broad. The phrase is a premise, not the conclusion, and it
contradicts rather than restates the economists' claim.
3. Researchers found that people who drink green tea daily report higher overall
health than those who do not, and they conclude that drinking green tea improves
health.
A. In a controlled study, participants randomly assigned to drink green tea daily showed
improved health markers compared with a control group.
B. The green tea drinkers in the study also worked out more and ate better diets.
C. The study relied entirely on self-reported measures of health.
D. Many of the green tea drinkers later stopped drinking it.
Correct Answer: A. In a controlled study, participants randomly assigned to drink
green tea daily showed improved health markers compared with a control group.
Rationale: Random assignment with a control group directly supports a causal link. The
other options either introduce confounds, rely on weak measures, or are irrelevant to
the causal claim.
4. A city councilmember argues that building a new stadium will revitalize the
downtown, pointing to the nearby city of Westbrook, which built a stadium and then
saw new businesses open downtown.
A. Westbrook's stadium is slightly larger than the one proposed.
B. Stadiums sometimes host concerts.
C. The councilmember has advocated for other construction projects.
D. Westbrook's economy was already booming before its stadium was built, unlike this
city.
Correct Answer: D. Westbrook's economy was already booming before its stadium
was built, unlike this city.
Rationale: This weakens the argument by showing the analogy fails: Westbrook's
growth had an independent cause, so the stadium may not be responsible. The other
options do not bear on the causal claim.
5. The city plans to charge drivers a toll to enter the downtown area, arguing that the
plan will succeed because drivers will switch to public transit.
A. Every driver will switch to public transit.
B. Tolls always reduce traffic congestion.
C. Public transit has sufficient capacity to absorb the additional riders.
D. Drivers enjoy paying tolls.
Correct Answer: C. Public transit has sufficient capacity to absorb the additional
riders.
Rationale: The plan requires that transit can absorb the new riders; if capacity is
lacking, the plan fails, so this is a necessary assumption. The other options overstate or
are irrelevant.
, 6. Ana is skilled at puzzles. Therefore, Ana is a member of the chess club. Which of the
following, if true, would make the argument valid?
A. Everyone who is a member of the chess club is skilled at puzzles.
B. Everyone who is skilled at puzzles is a member of the chess club.
C. Some people who are skilled at puzzles are not in the chess club.
D. Ana is also a member of the debate club.
Correct Answer: B. Everyone who is skilled at puzzles is a member of the chess
club.
Rationale: If all skilled puzzle-solvers are chess club members, then Ana's skill
guarantees membership, making the argument valid. The second option only guarantees
the reverse direction.
7. To show that the proposed tax cut would not stimulate the economy, a senator
points to three previous tax cuts that failed to produce economic growth.
A. Attacking the character of the opponents.
B. Arguing by analogy from past cases.
C. Appealing to the authority of experts.
D. Using circular reasoning.
Correct Answer: B. Arguing by analogy from past cases.
Rationale: The senator supports the conclusion by citing analogous past instances. The
argument neither attacks people, nor cites authorities, nor assumes its own conclusion.
8. Principle: A public official should recuse themselves from any decision in which
they have a significant financial interest. Councilmember Lee votes on a zoning
change for a property she owns.
A. Lee acted properly because she disclosed the interest.
B. Lee should resign from the council.
C. Lee should have recused herself from the zoning vote.
D. The zoning change is automatically void.
Correct Answer: C. Lee should have recused herself from the zoning vote.
Rationale: Lee's ownership is a significant financial interest, so the principle requires
recusal from the vote. Disclosure, resignation, or automatic voiding are not what the
principle prescribes.
9. Paradox: Despite record-high voter registration, turnout in the last election was
lower than in the previous election. Which of the following, if true, most helps to
resolve the paradox?
A. Turnout is always exactly the same in every election.
B. Registration was actually much lower than reported.
C. Registration drives signed up many people who remained unlikely to vote, and harsh
weather depressed turnout on election day.
D. No election was held last year.