WGU D265 Task 1: Critical Thinking Case Study Evaluation Template 2026 update

Choose one of the case studies from the Case Study list in Supporting Documents. Read the case study carefully. Then, complete the evaluation of the case study by filling out the template below. You will write your response to each item in the blank box underneath each section. For more information on each item below, you can review the Learning Resource sections referenced in each section. No more than 30% of your written response can match other sources. Premise(s) and Conclusion Please provide the labeled premise(s) and conclusion of an argument from your selected case study below. Review Section 1, Lesson 2 in the course for help with this task aspect. Premise(s): P1: Fatima handles grocery budgeting, household bills, and savings for her family of four. P2: Household budget considerations are harder than those for business expenses. P3: Many small business owners operate without professional help for finances. Conclusion: Thus, Fatima does not need a financial advisor and is capable of handling the finances for her business. D265 Task 1: Thinking Critically Task 1 Template Deductive/ Inductive In the box below, please describe whether the argument is deductive or inductive. Review Section 1, Lesson 4 in the course for help with D265 Task 1: Thinking Critically Task 1 Template this task aspect. This argument is inductive. Amanda does not claim that Fatima is bound to be a success, but rather, it is inferred that she will be because she was so good with the family budget and Amanda's appeal is one of competing and incentive, not logical expectedness. Therefore, it's a conclusion that is likely, but not guaranteed.