Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Leer en línea o como PDF ¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Vista previa 2 fuera de 9 páginas
Examen

MRL3701 Assignment 1 Semester 2 2026

Document preview thumbnail
Vista previa 2 fuera de 9 páginas

Insolvency Law - MRL3701 Assignment 1 Semester 2 2026 - Due 13 August 2026; 100 % TRUSTED workings, Expert Solved, Explanations and Solutions. For assistance call or W.h.a.t.s.a.p.p us on ...(.+.2.5.4.7.7.9.5.4.0.1.3.2)........... MRL3701 Assessment 1 Semester 2 2026 3 Question 1 Naledi runs a small architectural practice in Polokwane. Owing to a downturn in the construction industry she is struggling to pay her creditors on time, although her assets still exceed her liabilities. In March her elderly mother, who lives in Portugal, suffers a severe stroke. Naledi immediately flies to Lisbon to care for her, informing her office that she will return once her mother's condition stabilises. Six months later, Naledi has still not returned to South Africa. Her creditors, growing anxious, approach you as a candidate attorney for advice on whether they can rely on her absence to apply for the sequestration of her estate. Advise the creditors whether Naledi has committed an act of insolvency in terms of s 8(a) of the Insolvency Act. In your answer, set out the requirements of s 8(a), discuss the intention requirement and how it is proved, and apply the law to Naledi's circumstances. (5) Question 2 Thabo and Lerato have been married out of community of property since 2025. Thabo runs a small panel-beating business in Springs, and Lerato is employed as a quantity surveyor. Over the past year Thabo's business has collapsed, and the couple have stopped paying their accounts. One of Thabo's major suppliers, Steelcor (Pty) Ltd, is owed R180 000 and has heard that Thabo recently transferred his bakkie into his brother's name for no payment. The manager of Steelcor (Pty) Ltd consults you, wanting to know whether the company can bring an application to have Thabo's estate sequestrated. Advise Steelcor (Pty) Ltd on the requirements it must prove to convince a court to grant an application for compulsory sequestration. (5) TOTAL FOR ASSIGNMENT 01: [10]

Vista previa del contenido

MRL3701
ASSIGNMENT 1
SEMESTER 2 2026
UNIQUE NO.
DUE DATE: 13 AUGUST 2026

, Insolvency Law - MRL3701

Assignment 1 Semester 2 2026

QUESTION 1

Naledi’s creditors must determine whether her conduct amounts to an act of
insolvency in terms of section 8(a) of the Insolvency Act 24 of 1936. Section 8(a)
provides that a debtor commits an act of insolvency if she leaves the Republic, remains
outside the Republic, departs from her dwelling, or otherwise absents herself with the
intention of evading or delaying payment of her debts.

There are therefore two essential requirements. First, there must be an act of departure
or absence contemplated by the section. Secondly, and more importantly, the absence
must be accompanied by the intention to evade or delay payment of debts. The
mere fact that a debtor is absent from South Africa is not, on its own, sufficient to
establish an act of insolvency. The creditor must establish the required intention.

The intention contemplated in section 8(a) is a subjective intention. This means that
the court must determine what the debtor actually intended when she left, remained
outside the Republic or otherwise absented herself. However, because a person's state
of mind cannot ordinarily be established directly, the court determines intention through
inferential reasoning. In Hassan and Another v Berrange NO 2006 (6) SA 329 (SCA),
the Supreme Court of Appeal confirmed that intention under section 8(a) is subjective
and must be established from all the relevant facts and circumstances. The court
considers what, on the probabilities, was the debtor's dominant, operative or effective
intention. A debtor's mere denial of an intention to evade or delay payment is therefore
not decisive.

The same approach was followed in Oro Africa (Pty) Ltd v Currin 2015, where the court
explained that leaving the Republic or remaining absent from it may give rise to an
inference of the required intention, but absence alone is insufficient. There may be an
innocent or legitimate explanation for the absence, and the surrounding circumstances

Libro relacionado
 image
Steven A. Frieze Insolvency Law
Editorial: 2001 ISBN: 9781859415757 Edición: Desconocido

Información del documento

Subido en
14 de agosto de 2026
Número de páginas
9
Escrito en
2026/2027
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas
$4.76

¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis Dentro de los 14 días posteriores a la compra y antes de descargarlo, puedes elegir otro documento. Puedes gastar el importe de nuevo.
Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Leer en línea o como PDF

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
LIBvault
4.0
(4)
Vendido
62
Seguidores
0
Artículos
70
Última venta
20 horas hace


Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes