100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Resumen

Full summary of problem 1, block 2.1

Puntuación
-
Vendido
-
Páginas
8
Subido en
19-04-2021
Escrito en
2020/2021

Here is a summary of problem 1, block 2.1. It has been edited after the post discussion so only relevant information is included. All sources and materials are included in the summaries. My average was a 7.7.

Institución
Grado

Vista previa del contenido

Problem 1

Learning Goals:
1. What is a serial position curve?
2. What influences remembering?
3. How does working memory function?
4. What is the role of interference?
5. What is the role of attention in memory?
6. How and why do we get distracted?
7. What are filter theories and how do they explain task-switching?
8. What influences our attention?

Problem A.

Memory is limited in both duration and capacity
 Short term memory- memory system that holds a small amount of
information newly acquired information
 Long term memory- memory system that has a large capacity and
contains your memory for experiences and information that
develops throughout one’s lifetime

The Magical number 7+/-2 (Miller)
 we can usually remember 5-9 items
 Chunk – a basic unit in short term memory that consists of several
items that are strongly associated together.
- E.g. 2001 (1 chunk) – 19 (1 chunk) – 39548 (5 chunks)

Brown/Peterson and Peterson
 material held in memory for less than 1 minute is frequently
forgotten
 Ppt are instructed to remember some items - Perform a distracting
task – Asked to recall the original items
- Recall was better early on as there was less interference
- Recall was better with a shorter delay period

Serial position effect
 U-shaped relationship between word position in a list and the
probability of recall
 Strong recency effect- better recall of items at the end of the list
due to them still being in short term memory at the time of recall
 3-7 item capacity
 Strong primacy effect- better recall of items at the beginning of the
list as 1. they don’t need to compete with earlier items and 2. They
are rehearsed more frequently

Semantic similarity of the items in short term memory
 Semantics – the meaning of words and sentences

,  Proactive interference (PI) –previously learnt material interferes
with to-be-learned material and thus it is hard to learn new material
 Release from proactive interference- usually occurs when the
category of items is changed (e.g. from letters to numbers) or the
semantic category is changed
 Semantic factors influence the number of items we can store in STM
- Previously stored words can interfere with the recall of new
words that are similar in meaning
- The degree of similarity is related to the amount of interference

Atkinson and Shiffrin model- information processing model –
sensory memory, short term store, long term store – computer
model

Problem B.

Working memory (Baddeley and Hitch)
 We use short term memory when performing complex tasks
 We briefly store information about the outcome of early processes in
STM as you move on to later processes
1. Central executive- modality free attentional system
- Limited capacity
- Resembles attention
- Deals with cognitively demanding tasks
2. Phonological loop- speech- based storage system
- Slave system used by the CE for specific purposes
- Preserves the order in which words are presented
- Limited capacity
3. Visio-spatial sketchpad- spatial and visual storage system
- Slave system used by the CE for specific purposes
- Stores and manipulates spatial and visual information
- Limited capacity
4. Episodic buffer- integrates information from the VS sketchpad and
P loop
 Assumptions:
- If 2 tasks use the same component, they can’t be performed
successfully together
- If 2 tasks use different components, it should be possible to
perform them together as well as separately

Phonological loop
 Consists of 2 components
- A passive phonological store directly concerned with speech
perception
- An articulatory process linked to speech production (i.e.
rehearsal) giving access to the phonological store
 Phonological similarity effect- reduced immediate serial recall
when words are phonologically (sounds) similar e.g. FEE, HE, KNEE
- Semantic processing also plays a part

Escuela, estudio y materia

Institución
Estudio
Grado

Información del documento

Subido en
19 de abril de 2021
Número de páginas
8
Escrito en
2020/2021
Tipo
RESUMEN

Temas

$8.26
Accede al documento completo:

100% de satisfacción garantizada
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Tanto en línea como en PDF
No estas atado a nada


Documento también disponible en un lote

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
LRV31 Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
23
Miembro desde
5 año
Número de seguidores
22
Documentos
108
Última venta
2 año hace

3.0

7 reseñas

5
1
4
0
3
4
2
2
1
0

Documentos populares

Recientemente visto por ti

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes