Standard bank Studienführer, Klassennotizen & Zusammenfassungen

Well-structured LML4807 Assignment 1 (ANSWERS) Semester 1 2024 - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED.. (DETAILED ANSWERS - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED!). Briefly discuss the following prescribed case: Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd v Echo Petroleum 2012 (5) SA 283 (SCA) The allocation of marks for the discussion is as follows: 1. Facts of the case (3) 2. Issue before the court (1) 3. The decision of the court (4) 4. A critical comment on the decision (2)

LJU4804 PORTFOLIO MEMO - MAY/JUNE 2023 - SEMESTER 1 - UNISA (DETAILED MEMO WITH FOOTNOTES- DISTINCTION GUARANTEED!) QUESTION 1 Instructions: Read the set of facts and answer the questions that follow. Mr John Wick married Mrs Mary Wick in April 2003 while on vacation in Bridgetown, Barbados. At the time of entering into the marriage, John and Mary Wick were both domiciled in New York (United States of America), but were Irish citizens. A year prior to this marriage to Mary, John Wick obtain...

LML4807 PORTFOLIO MEMO - MAY/JUNE 2023 - SEMESTER 1 - UNISA (DETAILED MEMO - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED!) QUESTION 1 (Your answer should not exceed 2 pages) Briefly explain or discuss the following: 1.1 A creditor’s rights in terms of a stop order. (3) 1.2 The concept of safekeeping by banks. (4) 1.3 A bank’s common-law duty of confidentiality. (5) 1.4 The concept of mutuum. (4) 1.5 The operation of tripartite credit cards. (4) [20] QUESTION 2 (Your answer should not exceed 2 pages) ...

HRM3706 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 1 2024 - DUE April 2024 ;100% TRUSTED workings, explanations and solutions. for assistance Whats-App....0.6.7..1.7.1..1.7.3.9 ............ Question text Nomsa feels her low performance rating is unfair as she was not aware of all the concerns and deadlines. During which stage can Nomsa raise her dissatisfaction? a. Performance contract b. Performance development c. Performance appraisal d. Monitoring and evaluation Clear my choice Question 2 Ans...

LML4807 Assignment 1 (DETAILED ANSWERS) Semester 1 2024 (210537) - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED Answers, guidelines, workings and references ............ Briefly discuss the following prescribed case: Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd v Echo Petroleum 2012 (5) SA 283 (SCA) The allocation of marks for the discussion is as follows: 1. Facts of the case (3) 2. Issue before the court (1) 3. The decision of the court (4) 4. A critical comment on th...

Members of investment stokvels contribute a fixed amount of money usually on a monthly basis. The funds are saved and allowed to accumulate before investment in business ventures. High-budget stokvels operate as financial institutions and are established for the purpose of promoting savings and investments. 1.1.2 Members make fixed contributions to cover funeral expenses. The specific benefits are defined in the constitution of the relevant stokvel and usually include purchase of a coffi...

SECTION 1 1.1 X and Y are charged with the offence of high treason. The allegations by the prosecution are that the two accused ‘sold information crucial to the security of the Republic to an agent representing the country of Zamunda’ before escaping to Silo, a country in the East African region. 1.1.1 The National Director of Public Prosecutions (NDPP) Nono Dodo, is of the firm view that the charges against the accused should, when they are arrested, be tried in the regional court ‘due ...

TLI4801 PORTFOLIO MEMO - SEMESTER 2 - 2022 - UNISA (WITH DETAILED FOOTNOTES AND A BIBLIOGRAPHY)️️️️️ QUESTION 1: CIVIL PRACTICE 1. A client arrives at your office. You notice that she is using crutches and her right leg is in a cast. She informs you that she has been involved in a motor collision. Her leg was broken and she sustained bruises on her face and body as a result of the accident. Her car has also been damaged. There is a problem with her insurance. She has no income. An...

Contains Latest Summaries of the following Unjustified Enrichment & Estoppel Cases: 1. Nortje v Pool; 2. Gouws v Jester Pools; 3. Gouws v Jester Pools; 4. Brooklyn House Furnishers v Knoetze; 5. Willis Faber Enthoven; 6. CIR v First National International Bank; 7. Govender v Standard Bank of South Africa; 8. CIR v Visser; 9. FNB v B & H Engineering; 10. Leeuw v FNB; 11. Odendaal v Van Oudtshoorn; 12. Thomas v Baumann & Gilfillan; 13. Electrolux (Pty) Ltd v Khota, etc..

Contains Latest summaries of the following Unjustified Enrichment & Estoppel Cases: 1. Nortje v Pool; 2. Gouws v Jester Pools; 3. Gouws v Jester Pools; 4. Brooklyn House Furnishers v Knoetze; 5. Willis Faber Enthoven; 6. CIR v First National International Bank; 7. Govender v Standard Bank of South Africa; 8. CIR v Visser; 9. FNB v B & H Engineering; 10. Leeuw v FNB; 11. Odendaal v Van Oudtshoorn; 12. Thomas v Baumann & Gilfillan; 13. Electrolux (Pty) Ltd v Khota, etc..