100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

D265 - WGU - Critical Thinking - Reason and Evidence Exam 2025 (Actual Exam) Questions with verified Answers (Latest Update 2025) UPDATE!!

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
21
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
04-10-2025
Geschreven in
2025/2026

D265 - WGU - Critical Thinking - Reason and Evidence Exam 2025 (Actual Exam) Questions with verified Answers (Latest Update 2025) UPDATE!!

Instelling
D265 - WGU - Critical Thinking - Reason
Vak
D265 - WGU - Critical Thinking - Reason










Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Geschreven voor

Instelling
D265 - WGU - Critical Thinking - Reason
Vak
D265 - WGU - Critical Thinking - Reason

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
4 oktober 2025
Aantal pagina's
21
Geschreven in
2025/2026
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

10/4/25, 6:45 PM D265 - WGU - Critical Thinking - Reason and Evidence Exam 2025 (Actual Exam) Questions with verified Answers (Latest Update …




D265 - WGU - Critical Thinking - Reason and
Evidence Exam 2025 (Actual Exam) Questions
with verified Answers (Latest Update 2025)
UPDATE!!

Save




Terms in this set (100)


PROPOSITIONS Are statements that can be true or false

Are sentences that are not statements about matters
NON-PROPOSITONS of fact or fiction. They do not make a claim that can be
true or false.

Have no internal logic structure, meaning whether
they are true or false does not depend on whether a
SIMPLE PROPOSITIONS part of them is true or false. They are simply true or
false on their own. (Example: Harry Potter wears
glasses. The sky is blue.)

Have internal logic structure, meaning they are
composed of simple propositions. Whether they are
true or false depends on whether their parts are true
COMPLEX
or false. (Example: The sky is blue, but it does not look
PROPOSITIONS
blue to me right now. The cat ate the food, but he did
not like it. The GDP of Canada is either $3 trillion or
$12 trillion.)

Words used to identify AND, OR, EITHER, BUT, IF, THEN.
Independent Propositions



https://quizlet.com/1087279978/d265-wgu-critical-thinking-reason-and-evidence-exam-2025-actual-exam-questions-with-verified-answers-latest-upda… 1/21

,10/4/25, 6:45 PM D265 - WGU - Critical Thinking - Reason and Evidence Exam 2025 (Actual Exam) Questions with verified Answers (Latest Update …


THEREFORE, SO, IT FOLLOWS THAT, HENCE, THUS,
CONCLUSION
ENTAILS THAT, WE MAY CONCLUDE THAT, IMPLIES
INDICATORS
THAT, WHEREFORE, AND AS A RESULT.

BECAUSE, FOR, GIVEN THAT, AS, SINCE, AS
PREMISE INDICATORS
INDICATED BY.

Arguments where the premises guarantee or
necessitate the conclusion.
DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS
-mathematical arguments, logical arguments,
arguments from definition.

Arguments where the premises make the conclusion
probable.
INDUCTION ARGUMENTS
-analogies, authority, causal inferences,
extrapolations, etc.

INFERENCE TO THE BEST Arguments where the best available explanation is
EXPLANATION OR chosen as the correct explanation.
ABDUCTION

FORMAL FALLACY Concerns the structure of an argument

INFORMAL FALLACY Concerns the informational content of an argument

A FORMAL FALLACY IS A Bad Argument Structure
TYPE OF

Which piece of Whether the name of the author and the publication
information would be the are identified
most helpful to know in
assessing the credibility of
a news story?

Which questions are most Who funded it? & Does it try to get you to distrust
appropriate for evaluating other sources?
the credibility of an
information source?




https://quizlet.com/1087279978/d265-wgu-critical-thinking-reason-and-evidence-exam-2025-actual-exam-questions-with-verified-answers-latest-upda… 2/21

, 10/4/25, 6:45 PM D265 - WGU - Critical Thinking - Reason and Evidence Exam 2025 (Actual Exam) Questions with verified Answers (Latest Update …


While researching a topic It is not feasible to determine which site is more
on the internet, a student credible from the information provided.
encounters two different
websites, one of that looks
more official than the
other and includes tables,
charts, and statistics, while
the other does not.
What is the line of
reasoning this student
should employ to
determine which site is
more credible?

In which way should an Skeptically, because the source may lack credibility.
information source be
approached if it is stating
that it is the only source of
real information and that
other sources cannot be
trusted?

The principle of charity suggests we should try to
PRINCIPLE OF CHARITY
understand ideas before criticizing them.

Which of the following are It is morally right to give others the benefit of the
reasons for applying the doubt.
principle of charity? It allows for a clearer understanding of the issue.




https://quizlet.com/1087279978/d265-wgu-critical-thinking-reason-and-evidence-exam-2025-actual-exam-questions-with-verified-answers-latest-upda… 3/21

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
TheMastermind Johns Hopkins University
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
4281
Lid sinds
7 maanden
Aantal volgers
7
Documenten
2805
Laatst verkocht
6 dagen geleden
EXAM STUDY

ALL KIND OF QUIZ AND EXAMS WITH GUARANTEE OF ANSWERS EXCELLENT HOMEWORK HELP AND TUTORING , Am an expert on major courses especially; psychology,Nursing, Human resource Management and Mathemtics Assisting students with quality work is my first priority. I ensure scholarly standards in my documents and that's why i'm one of the BEST GOLD RATED TUTORS in STUVIA. I assure a GOOD GRADE if you will use my work

4,8

453 beoordelingen

5
374
4
69
3
5
2
2
1
3

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen