Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

Summary Literature week 3

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
7
Geüpload op
16-04-2020
Geschreven in
2018/2019

This is a summary of all the literature of week 3 of the course Financial Management.

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Literature week 3 – Financial Management

Young, D. (2014) Management Accounting in Health Care Organizations
Chapter 6 – responsibility accounting: an overview
Accounting staff prepare financial statements for use by outsiders and cost analyses for use
by line and senior managers. Also undertake ad hoc analyses for use in making alternative
choice decisions. Next to this, a third kind of accounting information assists management in
making decisions: information generated via the responsibility accounting system (i.e.
management control system). This information focuses on the costs (sometimes revenues)
that are controllable by various managers and are their responsibility.

A responsibility accounting system (RAS) is concerned with planning and controlling rather
than measuring the organization’s resources. Responsibility center: an organizational unit
headed by a manager charged with achieving certain agreed-upon results (they are
responsible for this). Key issues is how senior management will measure the group’s
financial performance. Responsibility accounting system is focuses on the managers who are
responsible for controlling the use of those resources. It requires senior management to
establish a network of responsibility centers. So you’d look at the individuals who control
resources. In cost accounting on the other hand, one looks at the specific resources used.




Effectiveness: accomplishing what the organization wants to do. Efficiency: accomplishing
something at low cost (ratio of outputs to inputs). Goal of a RAS is to ensure the effective
and efficient use of an organisation’s resources. There is variety in RAS’s of different
organisations. This is due to the difference in the amount of autonomy and flexibility that

1

, senior management gives to lower-level managers. Although there is not one single correct
way to design a RAS, managers find RAS principles useful in designing systems to assist the
organization with its planning and control activities. Contingency theory – the form of the
organization should fit with its’ environment. The type of RAS is heavily dependent on how
it is embedded into its organizational context.

Each responsibility center (a laboratory, sales office, department etc.) generally exists of an
aggregation of smaller responsibility centers. Five main types of responsibility centers:
- Revenue centers: manager’s financial performance measured in terms of the amount
of revenue earned by that center.
- Standard expense centers: financial performance measured by a flexible budget. The
computation for the flexible budget can be made more precise by dividing the
department’s expenses into their fixed and variable components. With this method
only the variable components are flexed; the fixed components remain at their
budgeted levels as long as the volume is within the relevant range. Flexible budget is
the actual units used x variable cost per unit. Then the total of that plus total fixed
costs makes for the total budget.
- Discretionary expense centers: FP measured in terms of total expenses incurred by
the center regardless of how much output the center produces. No easy way to
measure unit of output, so usually receive a fixed budget which the manager needs
to adhere to in the time period.
- Profit centers: FP measured in terms of total revenues of the center – total expenses.
- Investment centers: FP measured in terms of the total revenues – expenses, as % of
the assets used (so the ROA).




Senior management determines the best formal organizational structure, which is a
prerequisite to designing the network of responsibility centers. This design is very
important, as it facilities the organisation’s ability to achieve its goals. Without it this might
not be achieveable. Everyone needs to know their role and responsibility. Incentives must
be given too, senior management must design an appropriate motivation process for
rewarding good performance.



2

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
16 april 2020
Aantal pagina's
7
Geschreven in
2018/2019
Type
SAMENVATTING
€4,99
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
jelena-k Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
Bekijk profiel
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
67
Lid sinds
7 jaar
Aantal volgers
35
Documenten
82
Laatst verkocht
3 jaar geleden

2,9

18 beoordelingen

5
1
4
3
3
11
2
0
1
3

Populaire documenten

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen