100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

ADVANCED ASSESSMENT: INTERPRETING FINDINGS AND FORMULATING DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSES 5th Edition by Goolsby test bank is not a book but rather exam practice questions and answers

Beoordeling
4,5
(2)
Verkocht
17
Pagina's
237
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
28-09-2024
Geschreven in
2024/2025

ADVANCED ASSESSMENT: INTERPRETING FINDINGS AND FORMULATING DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSES 5th Edition by Goolsby test bank is not a book but rather exam practice questions and answers. The test bank for ADVANCED ASSESSMENT: INTERPRETING FINDINGS AND FORMULATING DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSES 5th Edition by Goolsby is available for download immediately after purchase. Download Test Bank for Goolsby Edition pdf without delay.

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
ADVANCED ASSESSMENT Goolsby
Vak
ADVANCED ASSESSMENT Goolsby











Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Gekoppeld boek

Geschreven voor

Instelling
ADVANCED ASSESSMENT Goolsby
Vak
ADVANCED ASSESSMENT Goolsby

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
28 september 2024
Aantal pagina's
237
Geschreven in
2024/2025
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

TEST BANK FOR ADVANCED ASSESSMENT: I
8 8 8 8 8




NTERPRETING FINDINGS AND FORMULATI
8 8 8



NG DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSES 5TH EDITIO
8 8 8 8



N, MARY JO
8 8 8



GOOLSBY, LAURIE GRUBBS ISBN-10;
8 8 8




1719645930 / ISBN-13; 978-1719645935
8 8

,Chapter8 1.8 Assessment8 and8 Clinical8 Decision-Making:8 Overview

Multiple8Choice
Identify8the8choice8that8best8completes8the8statement8or8answers8the8question.

8 1. Which8type8of8clinical8decision-making8is8most8reliable?
A. Intuitive
B. Analytical
C. Experiential
D. Augenblick

8 2. Which8of8the8following8is8false?8To8obtain8adequate8history,8health-care8providers8must8be:
A. Methodical8and8systematic
B. Attentive8to8the8patient’s8verbal8and8nonverbal8language
C. Able8to8accurately8interpret8the8patient’s8responses
D. Adept8at8reading8into8the8patient’s8statements

8 3. Essential8parts8of8a8health8history8include8all8of8the8following8except:
A. Chief8complaint
B. History8of8the8present8illness
C. Current8vital8signs
D. All8of8the8above8are8essential8history8components

8 4. Which8of8the8following8is8false?8While8performing8the8physical8examination,8the8examiner8must8be8
able8to:
A. Differentiate8between8normal8and8abnormal8findings
B. Recall8knowledge8of8a8range8of8conditions8and8their8associated8signs8and8symptoms
C. Recognize8how8certain8conditions8affect8the8response8to8other8conditions
D. Foresee8unpredictable8findings

8 5. The8following8is8the8least8reliable8source8of8information8for8diagnostic8statistics:
A. Evidence-based8investigations
B. Primary8reports8of8research
C. Estimation8based8on8a8provider’s8experience
D. Published8meta-analyses

8 6. The8following8can8be8used8to8assist8in8sound8clinical8decision-making:
A. Algorithm8published8in8a8peer-reviewed8journal8article
B. Clinical8practice8guidelines
C. Evidence-based8research
D. All8of8the8above

8 7. If8a8diagnostic8study8has8high8sensitivity,8this8indicates8a:
A. High8percentage8of8persons8with8the8given8condition8will8have8an8abnormal8result
B. Low8percentage8of8persons8with8the8given8condition8will8have8an8abnormal8result
C. Low8likelihood8of8normal8result8in8persons8without8a8given8condition
D. None8of8the8above

,8 8. If8a8diagnostic8study8has8high8specificity,8this8indicates8a:
A. Low8percentage8of8healthy8individuals8will8show8a8normal8result
B. High8percentage8of8healthy8individuals8will8show8a8normal8result
C. High8percentage8of8individuals8with8a8disorder8will8show8a8normal8result
D. Low8percentage8of8individuals8with8a8disorder8will8show8an8abnormal8result
8 9. A8likelihood8ratio8above818indicates8that8a8diagnostic8test8showing8a:
A. Positive8result8is8strongly8associated8with8the8disease
B. Negative8result8is8strongly8associated8with8absence8of8the8disease
C. Positive8result8is8weakly8associated8with8the8disease
D. Negative8result8is8weakly8associated8with8absence8of8the8disease
8 888 10.8Which8of8the8following8clinical8reasoning8tools8is8defined8as8evidence-
based8resource8based8on8mathematical8modeling8to8express8the8likelihood8of8a8condition8in8select8s
ituations,8settings,8and/or8patients?
A. Clinical8practice8guideline
B. Clinical8decision8rule
C. Clinical8algorithm
D. Clinical8recommendation

, Answer8Section

MULTIPLE8CHOICE

1. ANS:8 B
Croskerry8(2009)8describes8two8major8types8of8clinical8diagnostic8decision-
making:8intuitive8and8analytical.8Intuitive8decision-making8(similar8to8Augenblink8decision-
making)8is8based8on8the8experience8and8intuition8of8the8clinician8and8is8less8reliable8and8paired8wit
h8fairly8common8errors.8In8contrast,8analytical8decision-
making8is8based8on8careful8consideration8and8has8greater8reliability8with8rare8errors.

PTS: 1
2. ANS:8 D
To8obtain8adequate8history,8providers8must8be8well8organized,8attentive8to8the8patient’s8verbal8and8n
onverbal8language,8and8able8to8accurately8interpret8the8patient’s8responses8to8questions.8Rather8tha
n8reading8into8the8patient’s8statements,8they8clarify8any8areas8of8uncertainty.

PTS: 1
3. ANS:8 C
Vital8signs8are8part8of8the8physical8examination8portion8of8patient8assessment,8not8part8of8the8health8his
tory.

PTS: 1
4. ANS:8 D
While8performing8the8physical8examination,8the8examiner8must8be8able8to8differentiate8between8nor
mal8and8abnormal8findings,8recall8knowledge8of8a8range8of8conditions,8including8their8associated8si
gns8and8symptoms,8recognize8how8certain8conditions8affect8the8response8to8other8conditions,8and8d
istinguish8the8relevance8of8varied8abnormal8findings.

PTS: 1
5. ANS:8 C
Sources8for8diagnostic8statistics8include8textbooks,8primary8reports8of8research,8and8published8me
ta-
analyses.8Another8source8of8statistics,8the8one8that8has8been8most8widely8used8and8available8for8a
pplication8to8the8reasoning8process,8is8the8estimation8based8on8a8provider’s8experience,8although8t
hese8are8rarely8accurate.8Over8the8past8decade,8the8availability8of8evidence8on8which8to8base8clini
cal8reasoning8is8improving,8and8there8is8an8increasing8expectation8that8clinical8reasoning8be8based8
on8scientific8evidence.8Evidence-
based8statistics8are8also8increasingly8being8used8to8develop8resources8to8facilitate8clinical8decision
-making.

PTS: 1
6. ANS:8 D
To8assist8in8clinical8decision-making,8a8number8of8evidence-
based8resources8have8been8developed8to8assist8the8clinician.8Resources,8such8as8algorithms8and8clin
ical8practice8guidelines,8assist8in8clinical8reasoning8when8properly8applied.
€19,31
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

100% tevredenheidsgarantie
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Lees online óf als PDF
Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten


Ook beschikbaar in voordeelbundel

Beoordelingen van geverifieerde kopers

Alle 2 reviews worden weergegeven
1 maand geleden

3 maanden geleden

4,5

2 beoordelingen

5
1
4
1
3
0
2
0
1
0
Betrouwbare reviews op Stuvia

Alle beoordelingen zijn geschreven door echte Stuvia-gebruikers na geverifieerde aankopen.

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
favouredone Havard university
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
322
Lid sinds
1 jaar
Aantal volgers
31
Documenten
8663
Laatst verkocht
1 week geleden
favoredone

Welcome to favoredone ! The place to find the best study materials for various subjects. You can be assured that you will receive only the best which will help you to ace your exams. All the materials posted are A+ Graded. Please rate and write a review after using my materials. Your reviews will motivate me to add more materials. Thank you very much!

4,4

339 beoordelingen

5
221
4
74
3
24
2
3
1
17

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen