100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

Summary of management research methods 2

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
43
Geüpload op
09-04-2024
Geschreven in
2023/2024

This summary provides all the knowledge needed for the exam of management research methods 2 at the University of Amsterdam (6612ZB016Y)












Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
9 april 2024
Aantal pagina's
43
Geschreven in
2023/2024
Type
Samenvatting

Onderwerpen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Management Research Methods 2 for Accountancy & Control

Week 1: Conceptual models & ANOVA

Variables we use:
- Outcome variable (OV) / Dependent variable (DV): variable to be explained.
- Predictor variable (PV) / Independent variable (IV); Variable that explains.

The p-value stands for the probability of obtaining a result (or test-statistic value).
If the P-value is <0.05, it means we need to reject H0.

Conceptual models:
Conceptual models help to visualize your research question and to build the hypothesis.
It is a visual representation of relations between theoretical constructs (variables) of
interest.

In research: by “model” we mean a simplified description of reality.

Variables can have different measurement scales:
- Categorical (binary, nominal, ordinal)
- Quantitative (discrete, interval, ratio)

Conceptual models: moderation
Moderating variables (or moderators): These alter the effect that an independent variable
has on a dependent variable. In other words, moderators change the “effect” component of
the cause-and-effect relationship.

For example:

RQ: What is the effect of a teacher’s commitment on student satisfaction, and how is this
relationship moderated by a teacher's communication skills?




H0: A teacher’s communication skills will not influence the relationship between the
commitment of the teacher and student satisfaction.

Ha: Teachers who are more committed will increase the satisfaction level of students,
but only when they have good communication skills.

, “Communication skills” is a moderation variable in this example. It moderates the
relationship between the main PV on the OV.

Conceptual models: mediation
Mediating variables (or mediator): Explains the process through which two variables are
related. A mediator is a way in which an independent variable impacts a dependent variable.
It’s part of the causal pathway of an effect, and it tells you how or why an effect takes place.

For example:

RQ: What underlying mechanism drives the effect of teacher’s commitment on student
satisfaction?




H0: The effect of teacher’s commitments on student satisfaction is not mediated by the
quality of the course material)

Ha: The positive effect of a teacher’s commitment on student satisfaction is mediated by the
quality of the course material.

“Lecture slide quality” is a mediating variable in this example. It mediates the relationship
between two other variables.

ANOVA:
With the ANOVA test, you can investigate with a certain level of (statistical) confidence, what
differences there might be between groups. It compares the variability between groups,
against the variability within groups. (Does it matter in which group you are?)

ANOVA/Analysis of variance:
- Statistically examines how much of the variability in our outcome variable can be
explained by our predictor variable.
- Outcome Variable (OV) = Quantitative
- Predictor Variable (PV) = Categorical with more than 2 groups.

,Assumptions:
- Variance is homogenous across groups (Levene’s test).
- Our subjects can only be in one group (Depedent).
- Group sizes need to be equal.

Example:
RQ: Is there a relation between shopping platform and customer satisfaction?




PV = Shopping platform (Categorical with three levels: 1-Brick-and-mortar store 2-web shop
3- Reseller).
OV = Customer satisfaction (Quantitative: score from 1-50).

SSr -Total variance in the data:




SSm: Model sum of squares:

, SSR: Residual sum of squares:




The total sum of squares:




1992.10 = 1140.68 + 51.42

Now we have this data, we can calculate the proportion of the total variance in our data that
is “explained” by our model.  R2 (R squared)

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
femkevanembden Hanzehogeschool Groningen
Bekijk profiel
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
28
Lid sinds
4 jaar
Aantal volgers
21
Documenten
16
Laatst verkocht
4 maanden geleden

3,7

3 beoordelingen

5
1
4
1
3
0
2
1
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen