100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

Summary/Samenvatting lectures/hoorcolleges Wild Years? Researching Youth in Different Cultures

Beoordeling
3,0
(2)
Verkocht
14
Pagina's
19
Geüpload op
28-10-2022
Geschreven in
2022/2023

Summary of all lectures (1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6) of the course Wild Years? Researching Youth in Different Cultures. Samenvatting van alle hoorcolleges (1, 2, 3, 4, 5 en 6) van het vak Wild Years? Researching Youth in Different Cultures.

Meer zien Lees minder










Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
28 oktober 2022
Aantal pagina's
19
Geschreven in
2022/2023
Type
Samenvatting

Onderwerpen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

WY SV LECTURES


LECTURE 1 (06/09) - Why Social Scientific Research Is WEIRD (Luzia Heu)
WEIRD:
- Western
- Educated
- Industrialized
- Rich
- Democratic

Why is it a problem if most researchers and research subjects/participants are WEIRD?
This is a problem because samples influence what we find and conclude:

1. Findings based on participants, not ‘people’ in general (and: who is ‘people’?)  wrong
theorizing and models
2. Findings may be different in different cultural contexts (generalizability?)  incomplete
knowledges and theories
3. Scientific colonialism = patholizing other ways of being or acting (different contexts, norms
and values).

Practical Implications:
• We may try to apply solutions (e.g., in interventions, design, organizations, therapy) in a context
where they do not work or are even counterproductive (“iatrogenic effects”) (e.g. incorrectly
identifying problems and giving diagnoses when there is no problem in the first place)
• We may incorrectly define or categorize certain groups (e.g., give diagnoses where there is no
problem at hand)  stigma?

Why is it a problem if most researchers are from WEIRD cultures?

1. Our cultural background influences what we find, how we interpret our findings and what we
conclude
2. Social and personal values, beliefs, norms determine what we research and how we research
it
• Which research do we fund? Which research do we define as relevant to examine? • Which
outcome variables do we examine?
• What do we define as desirable outcome?
• How do we measure abstract concepts?

NOT just a problem in psychology!

Suggestions to change WEIRD behavioral sciences:
• editors and reviewers push researchers to support generalizations with evidence
• granting agencies, reviewers and editors give credit for diverse and inconvenient subject pools
• granting agencies prioritize cross-disciplinary, cross-cultural research
• researchers evaluate how findings apply to other populations (note: only about research
participants, not researchers!)

Positionality = all characteristics and phenomena making up who you are and how you view the
world (e.g. personal characteristics, beliefs, values, experiences, etc.)

,Reflexivity = reflecting on (the influence of) one’s positionality on the research process and
interpretations of research outcomes (choice of topics, considered desirable outcome, interpretation
of results, ect.)  being aware of your positionality and its effects

Note: is it possible to be an “objective” social scientist?



Culture:
Concept that is hard to define: not one ‘right’ definition, but many definitions.
My definition: a type of social group that shares some kind of values, norms, practices, etc. (though
much variation is still possible and likely within this group based on other things (and: there are
always (individual) exceptions!)).
It often entails...
- human-made part of human environment
- learned meanings
- transmitted over generations
- shared interpretations
- socialization

 in this course:
- intersubjective understanding of culture
- culture = shared ideas (BUT: imperfectly shared)

- ‘ideas’ entail social norms (descriptive and injunctive), values and beliefs

‘Culture is an evolved constellation of loosely organized ideas and practices that are shared (albeit
imperfectly) among a collection of interdependent individuals and transmitted across generations for
the purpose of coordinating individual goal pursuits in collective living’ (Chiu, Leung, & Hong, 2010

SO: in an intersubjective understanding of culture …
• Culture consists of shared ideas (e.g., norms, beliefs, and values) and shared practices/behaviour
• These are passed on from one generation to the next
• These shared ideas help us live together in groups although members of these groups have
different (and sometimes conflicting) aims



Social norms: unwritten rules about what is typically done or ought to be done (what people do
(descriptive) or ought to do (injunctive))
- descriptive norms: unwritten rules about what most people do
- injunctive norms: unwritten rules about what people should do

- E.g.:
- descriptive: “Most adolescents move out of their parent’s home when they are 18.”
- injunctive: “Adolescents should become independent from their parents.”

Values: what people value, what is considered good, bad, desirable, important, ect. (similar to
injunctive norms)

- E.g.: “It is important to enter partnerships only based on love.”
(BUT: often a word, e.g. ‘individual freedom’, ‘mutual respect’, ‘equality’)

Beliefs: what is thought to be true (what people perceive to be true)

, - E.g.: “A love-based marriage is more fulfilling than an arranged marriage.”

These 3 oftentimes intersect/interrelate/overlap, difficult to disentangle!



Culture (i.e., shared ideas and practices) develops in all kinds of groups (i.e., collection of people with
some relation or shared characteristic) that live in different contexts...

3 types of contexts:

- Geographical contexts (e.g., countries, different cities, different villages, rural and urban
areas)
- Social contexts (e.g., groups with different SES, different gender, different political
orientation)
- Temporal contexts (i.e., over time)

And: Culture can vary at all kinds of levels (e.g. proximity to individual: family/friends, neighborhood,
city, area, country, ect.)

SO: Culture can vary between contexts, within types of contexts and at different kinds of levels!



LECTURE 2 (12/09) – Generalizability of social scientific research: How similar
or different are we? (Luzia Heu)
Commonalities for adolescents cross-culturally, examples: same basic needs, same basic physical
make-up, social, family, going through puberty, having an identity that means something, rituals,
growing responsibility, ect.

Adolescence seems to be recognized as a distinct life phase across cultures  commonality!
• Usually starts with puberty (i.e., reproductive maturation)
• Sudden transition from childhood to new roles and responsibilities
• Courtship (almost always ends with marriage?  most literature reviewed is from 1991)
• Peer groups are particularly important

Examples of commonalities among adolescents cross-culturally: system of social status and methods
of indicating it, courtship practices, dancing, myths, etc. (Fox 2004),
AND: social sanctions for deviations from social norms are perceived as appropriate

Differences for adolescents cross-culturally, examples: norms, values, religion, gender roles, youth-
elderly relations, independence, parenting styles, food habits, ect.
AND: adolescence as a period of conflict: this is not everywhere (in a lot of non-industrial countries
(e.g. Samoa, Mead)).
AND: adolescence as period of preparation for independence from parents: only in industrial
societies  in non-industrial societies:
1) No need because married couples also live close to their families,
2) Family unit provides financial / social support, livelihood, and status
AND: regarding male and female peer group differences ‘commonality’ depending on how you define
cultural/social context
- Male adolescents spend more time with peers than female adolescents
- Peer groups of females usually smaller; and less significant than for males

Beoordelingen van geverifieerde kopers

Alle 2 reviews worden weergegeven
3 jaar geleden

3 jaar geleden

3,0

2 beoordelingen

5
0
4
1
3
0
2
1
1
0
Betrouwbare reviews op Stuvia

Alle beoordelingen zijn geschreven door echte Stuvia-gebruikers na geverifieerde aankopen.

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
janaravenhorst Universiteit Utrecht
Bekijk profiel
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
18
Lid sinds
3 jaar
Aantal volgers
16
Documenten
5
Laatst verkocht
1 jaar geleden

3,0

2 beoordelingen

5
0
4
1
3
0
2
1
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen