100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

Summary Ethics (version 2021)

Beoordeling
4,0
(1)
Verkocht
8
Pagina's
25
Geüpload op
05-11-2021
Geschreven in
2020/2021

I wrote this summary, based on the lecture in the year 2021. It gives a nice overview of the course, and helped me to pass the exam with an 8,5.











Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
5 november 2021
Aantal pagina's
25
Geschreven in
2020/2021
Type
Samenvatting

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Lecture notes Ethics

Lecture 1: Introduction Lecture (5th January)

Take-home message
- Ethics is the practical study of deciding how we ought to act.
- We have to engage in ethical reflection when the values, rights, interests, desires of
‘another’ are at stake or harmed
- Almost anything can be a morally pertinent other
- Ethical reasoning requires an open mind and critical reasoning skills
- In this course, we look at ethics as a design discipline

Ethics is the practical study of deciding how we ought to act.

The branch of philosophy that deals with morality and values
- Systematic reflection on morality (values, norms, beliefs)
- Providing reasons to justify our decision
The purpose of education is to learn how to think for yourself

Moral problems arise when the values, rights, interests, desires of ‘another’ are at stake or
harmed.
 but how do we recognize these values, rights, interests and desires?
 how do we define ‘the other’?
 who is proper subject of moral concern?
 who or what can be said to have ‘intrinsic value’?
Ethical reasoning is needed whenever we are confronted with a moral problem.

Values refer to what is (or
is perceived as) good.
 Values can be
translated into norms


Intermediate step: conceptualization and analysis.
 what do you mean with value such-and-such?
 why is this valuable?
 how does it relate to other values?
 when or where is this relevant?
Specific! Tie in with context!

Thomas Midgley jr.
 invented or leaded fuel and chlorofluorocarbon (refrigerants)
1. Leaded fuel: to keep engines from “knocking”
o Did have an immense negative impact on human health and environment
o It took more than half a century before all fuels were free of lead (again)
 Toxicity of lead was already known
 Alternative was readily available

,What went wrong here?
- Safety for people and planate were not clearly among General Motor’s or Midgley’s
core values
- These private actors did not assume responsibility for the public good but only for
their own immediate interests
- Short-term and local benefits were prioritized over long(er)-term and
global/scattered costs

Motivational assumptions:
- Science, technology and innovation can help to solve problems and be valuable in
many ways – but can also cause (new) problems
- Ethics can be a facilitator or even a driver of research, technology and innovation for
good
- This minimally requires prevention of future harmful innovations (like leaded fuel)
- For this, theoretical knowledge and practical instruments for and hands-on-practice
in moral deliberation are requisite.

The direct and indirect, intended and
unintended influences of scientists on the moral
states of others is large.




Lecture 2: Safe by Design (5th January)

Safe-by-design is about:
- Thinking before doing
- Taking safety – in the broadest sense of the word – into
account integrally in innovation trajectories
- Making doing the right thing standard practice, instead of
merely doing things right.

There are standardized ways of dealing with risks:
- REACH (chemical substances)
- Risk assessment genetically modified organisms
- CE-certification (Conformité Européenne)
- ISO-standards
- EMA-guidelines
- Etc.

Working by such standards will help you to bring a lot of danger into the world. You might
check all these boxes, but this does not have to mean that you do the right thing.
 You do things right, BUT do you do the right thing?

, Safety is a very important value (Safety first).
- It’s broad – environment / animals / humans / species / ecosystems
- Being safe means being protected against harmful events, products, processes, etc.

What is a design?
- Bio-engineering / Chemical-engineering / Nanotechnology / Medical technologies /
instruments / hardware / software
- Model of engineering,
However in real life it
is not linear!

Values differ between these phases:
- originality, truth
- usefulness, chance of profit

Definitions:
Science: the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural
world.
Technology: the science of craft: techniques, skills, methods, processes used to produce
goods or services, knowledge and machinery
Innovation: new ideas, concepts, product, process, technology

Technoscience: Science and technology and social context!
 Science and technology are linked and grow together
 Scientific knowledge is historically situated and socially constructed, and it is made
durable through material (non-human) networks
 Scientific knowledge requires an infrastructure of technology in order to remain
stationary or move forward

Innovations:
 aimed at impact on market an/or society
 practical implementation of invention/knowledge
 not necessarily new knowledge

Ethics mainly is interested in the overlap between (new) knowledge intensive innovation!!

Safety:
- Often predominantly regarded as regulatory requirement
o safe by compliance
o end-of-pipe type interventions
- We are currently witnessing (in several fields) a shift towards safety as a core value
and a precondition for product development
- SbD expresses this move towards taking into account safety pro-actively, early on,
continuously and integrally in research and innovation trajectories

Beoordelingen van geverifieerde kopers

Alle reviews worden weergegeven
3 jaar geleden

4,0

1 beoordelingen

5
0
4
1
3
0
2
0
1
0
Betrouwbare reviews op Stuvia

Alle beoordelingen zijn geschreven door echte Stuvia-gebruikers na geverifieerde aankopen.

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
laurens2 Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Bekijk profiel
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
64
Lid sinds
5 jaar
Aantal volgers
47
Documenten
19
Laatst verkocht
11 maanden geleden

4,0

1 beoordelingen

5
0
4
1
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen