Garantie de satisfaction à 100% Disponible immédiatement après paiement En ligne et en PDF Tu n'es attaché à rien 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Examen

HMEMS80 MAY JUNE FINAL PORTFOLIO (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 1 2025 (Q1, Q2, & Q3) - DUE 6 June 2025 ;100% trusted ,comprehensive and complete reliable solution with clear explanation

Note
-
Vendu
-
Pages
34
Qualité
A+
Publié le
22-05-2025
Écrit en
2024/2025

HMEMS80 MAY JUNE FINAL PORTFOLIO (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 1 2025 (Q1, Q2, & Q3) - DUE 6 June 2025 ;100% trusted ,comprehensive and complete reliable solution with clear explanation

Établissement
Cours











Oups ! Impossible de charger votre document. Réessayez ou contactez le support.

Livre connecté

École, étude et sujet

Établissement
Cours

Infos sur le Document

Publié le
22 mai 2025
Nombre de pages
34
Écrit en
2024/2025
Type
Examen
Contenu
Questions et réponses

Sujets

Aperçu du contenu

,HMEMS80 MAY JUNE FINAL PORTFOLIO (COMPLETE
ANSWERS) Semester 1 2025 (Q1, Q2, & Q3) - DUE 6
June 2025 ;100% trusted ,comprehensive and complete
reliable solution with clear explanation



Question 1: Quantitative Research Proposal
Is there a statistically significant difference between the levels of
plagiarism for students who completed an academic
integrity/writing course and those who have not completed one
in the HMEMS80 module?


ANSWER

Quantitative Research Proposal
Title:
The Effect of Academic Integrity Training on Plagiarism Levels
among HMEMS80 Students
Introduction

Plagiarism is one of the most pressing academic integrity
violations in higher education, threatening the credibility of
academic institutions and the value of qualifications awarded.
With the increasing accessibility of digital content and online
sources, the temptation and opportunity for students to

,plagiarize has grown, whether intentionally or unintentionally.
To address this issue, many universities have introduced
academic writing or integrity training courses aimed at
equipping students with the skills, knowledge, and ethical
awareness needed to uphold academic standards. These courses
typically cover topics such as referencing techniques,
paraphrasing, critical thinking, and understanding the
consequences of academic dishonesty. However, the
effectiveness of such interventions in actually reducing incidents
of plagiarism remains underexplored and requires empirical
investigation. This study seeks to evaluate whether the
completion of an academic integrity or writing course results in
a statistically significant reduction in plagiarism levels among
students enrolled in the HMEMS80 module at a South African
university.




2. Research Problem and Question
Despite the widespread recognition of plagiarism as a serious
academic offence, its prevalence among university students
remains a significant concern. Technological advancements and
increased access to digital content have made it easier for
students to copy and misuse academic material without proper
attribution. In response, institutions have introduced academic
integrity or writing courses aimed at educating students about
plagiarism, ethical scholarship, and proper research and
referencing practices. However, there is limited empirical
evidence on whether these interventions are genuinely effective

, in reducing plagiarism. This lack of clarity presents a challenge
for academic policy makers and course designers who aim to
promote academic honesty through structured training programs.
This study focuses on students enrolled in the HMEMS80
module—a postgraduate research-based module—where the
integrity of student work is essential. The investigation will
examine whether students who have completed an academic
integrity or writing course demonstrate significantly lower levels
of plagiarism compared to those who have not.
Research Question:
Is there a statistically significant difference between the levels of
plagiarism for students who completed an academic
integrity/writing course and those who have not in the
HMEMS80 module?
3. Hypotheses
To address the research question, the following hypotheses are
formulated:
 Null Hypothesis (H₀):
There is no statistically significant difference in the levels
of plagiarism between students who completed an
academic integrity/writing course and those who have not
in the HMEMS80 module.
 Alternative Hypothesis (H₁):
There is a statistically significant difference in the levels of
plagiarism between students who completed an academic
integrity/writing course and those who have not in the
HMEMS80 module.
2,40 €
Accéder à l'intégralité du document:

Garantie de satisfaction à 100%
Disponible immédiatement après paiement
En ligne et en PDF
Tu n'es attaché à rien

Faites connaissance avec le vendeur

Seller avatar
Les scores de réputation sont basés sur le nombre de documents qu'un vendeur a vendus contre paiement ainsi que sur les avis qu'il a reçu pour ces documents. Il y a trois niveaux: Bronze, Argent et Or. Plus la réputation est bonne, plus vous pouvez faire confiance sur la qualité du travail des vendeurs.
LearnedWriter University of south africa
S'abonner Vous devez être connecté afin de pouvoir suivre les étudiants ou les formations
Vendu
896
Membre depuis
2 année
Nombre de followers
94
Documents
1174
Dernière vente
11 heures de cela
LearnedWriter

On this page you will find all documents offered by seller LearnedWriter.

4,1

107 revues

5
57
4
21
3
20
2
5
1
4

Pourquoi les étudiants choisissent Stuvia

Créé par d'autres étudiants, vérifié par les avis

Une qualité sur laquelle compter : rédigé par des étudiants qui ont réussi et évalué par d'autres qui ont utilisé ce document.

Le document ne convient pas ? Choisis un autre document

Aucun souci ! Tu peux sélectionner directement un autre document qui correspond mieux à ce que tu cherches.

Paye comme tu veux, apprends aussitôt

Aucun abonnement, aucun engagement. Paye selon tes habitudes par carte de crédit et télécharge ton document PDF instantanément.

Student with book image

“Acheté, téléchargé et réussi. C'est aussi simple que ça.”

Alisha Student

Foire aux questions