Tutors you can trust. Voted “BEST
SELLING” memos for the year 2024.
FUR2601
Fundamental Rights
ASSIGNMENT 2 MEMO
+ FREE EXTRA EXAMPACK/
NOTES BOOKLET
SEMESTER 1 – 2025 - UNISA
UNIQUE NUMBER: - 713253
DUE DATE: - 24 APRIL 2025
Footnotes/Bibliography included
ASSIGNMENT PREVIEW
QUESTION 1 [12]
There is a crisis in the provision of social grants due to an invalid tender. The matter goes to court, and the court gives its order. Examine the following
four items in the court order. Name each remedy used, and briefly explain why the Court chose to use each of them. (In other words, briefly explain the
necessity/benefit of each remedy.)
1.1 The Contract for the payment of social grants between the South African Social Security Agency (SASSA) and Cash Paymaster Services (Pty) Ltd
(Cash Paymaster) dated 3 February 2012 is declared invalid. (3)
Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used by our Tutors to draft this document, however the contents are provided “as is” without any representations o
warranties, express or implied. This document is to be used for comparison, research and reference purposes ONLY. No part of this documen
may be reproduced, resold or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission from the Author. – LLB EXAMPACKS
& TUTORIALS.
PAST PAPERS & MEMOS, ASSIGNMENT MEMOS, NOTES, SUMMARIES & TUITONS
Cell: 062 810 8624 Email:
Fax: 086 096 5452 www.llbexampacksandtutorials.co.za
, QUESTION 1 [12]
There is a crisis in the provision of social grants due to an invalid tender. The matter goes to court, and the
court gives its order. Examine the following four items in the court order. Name each remedy used, and
briefly explain why the Court chose to use each of them. (In other words, briefly explain the necessity/benefit
of each remedy.)
1.1 The Contract for the payment of social grants between the South African Social Security Agency
(SASSA) and Cash Paymaster Services (Pty) Ltd (Cash Paymaster) dated 3 February 2012 is
declared invalid. (3)
1.2 This declaration is suspended for twelve months, to allow SASSA to complete a new tender process
as per item (1.3) below. (3)
1.3 SASSA must initiate a new tender process for the payment of social grants within 30 days of this
order. (2)
1.4 The Minister and SASSA must return and file reports with this Court every three months, commencing
on the date of this order, setting out the progress of their plan to pay social grants after the expiry of
the 12-month period. (4)
QUESTION 2 [13]
With refence to relevant case law, describe what is meant by the phrase in section 26 and 27 of the Bill of
Rights that “the state must take reasonable, legislative and other measures, within its available resources,
to achieve progressive realisation of this rights”.
QUESTION 3 [15]
Two non-governmental organisations (NGOs) decide to start their own bursary funds. The first, “MEN Aid
NGO” aims to provide bursaries only to Agriculture students who are classified as “male”. The second,
“WOMEN Aid NGO” aims to provide bursaries only to Agriculture students who are classified as “female”.
Agriculture is 80% male dominated industry. Both NGOs claim that their bursary schemes amount to
redress measures, and thus cannot be unfair discrimination.
Discuss and compare the legal validity of the two bursary schemes, referring to relevant legal provisions
and case law. ONLY discuss whether these schemes are valid redress measures. In your answer, also
SELLING” memos for the year 2024.
FUR2601
Fundamental Rights
ASSIGNMENT 2 MEMO
+ FREE EXTRA EXAMPACK/
NOTES BOOKLET
SEMESTER 1 – 2025 - UNISA
UNIQUE NUMBER: - 713253
DUE DATE: - 24 APRIL 2025
Footnotes/Bibliography included
ASSIGNMENT PREVIEW
QUESTION 1 [12]
There is a crisis in the provision of social grants due to an invalid tender. The matter goes to court, and the court gives its order. Examine the following
four items in the court order. Name each remedy used, and briefly explain why the Court chose to use each of them. (In other words, briefly explain the
necessity/benefit of each remedy.)
1.1 The Contract for the payment of social grants between the South African Social Security Agency (SASSA) and Cash Paymaster Services (Pty) Ltd
(Cash Paymaster) dated 3 February 2012 is declared invalid. (3)
Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used by our Tutors to draft this document, however the contents are provided “as is” without any representations o
warranties, express or implied. This document is to be used for comparison, research and reference purposes ONLY. No part of this documen
may be reproduced, resold or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission from the Author. – LLB EXAMPACKS
& TUTORIALS.
PAST PAPERS & MEMOS, ASSIGNMENT MEMOS, NOTES, SUMMARIES & TUITONS
Cell: 062 810 8624 Email:
Fax: 086 096 5452 www.llbexampacksandtutorials.co.za
, QUESTION 1 [12]
There is a crisis in the provision of social grants due to an invalid tender. The matter goes to court, and the
court gives its order. Examine the following four items in the court order. Name each remedy used, and
briefly explain why the Court chose to use each of them. (In other words, briefly explain the necessity/benefit
of each remedy.)
1.1 The Contract for the payment of social grants between the South African Social Security Agency
(SASSA) and Cash Paymaster Services (Pty) Ltd (Cash Paymaster) dated 3 February 2012 is
declared invalid. (3)
1.2 This declaration is suspended for twelve months, to allow SASSA to complete a new tender process
as per item (1.3) below. (3)
1.3 SASSA must initiate a new tender process for the payment of social grants within 30 days of this
order. (2)
1.4 The Minister and SASSA must return and file reports with this Court every three months, commencing
on the date of this order, setting out the progress of their plan to pay social grants after the expiry of
the 12-month period. (4)
QUESTION 2 [13]
With refence to relevant case law, describe what is meant by the phrase in section 26 and 27 of the Bill of
Rights that “the state must take reasonable, legislative and other measures, within its available resources,
to achieve progressive realisation of this rights”.
QUESTION 3 [15]
Two non-governmental organisations (NGOs) decide to start their own bursary funds. The first, “MEN Aid
NGO” aims to provide bursaries only to Agriculture students who are classified as “male”. The second,
“WOMEN Aid NGO” aims to provide bursaries only to Agriculture students who are classified as “female”.
Agriculture is 80% male dominated industry. Both NGOs claim that their bursary schemes amount to
redress measures, and thus cannot be unfair discrimination.
Discuss and compare the legal validity of the two bursary schemes, referring to relevant legal provisions
and case law. ONLY discuss whether these schemes are valid redress measures. In your answer, also
