Garantie de satisfaction à 100% Disponible immédiatement après paiement En ligne et en PDF Tu n'es attaché à rien
logo-home
Lecture notes: Social Research Methodology 6,19 €   Ajouter au panier

Notes de cours

Lecture notes: Social Research Methodology

 14 vues  0 fois vendu
  • Cours
  • Établissement

Notes from the course Social Research Methodology, from the Sociology bachelor at UvA.

Aperçu 4 sur 42  pages

  • 6 mars 2023
  • 42
  • 2022/2023
  • Notes de cours
  • Gerben moerman
  • Toutes les classes
avatar-seller
Social Research Methodology, lecture 1, 31-10-2022
 Gerben’s beliefs:
o Methodology is related to philosophy of science, but not identical.
o The research question determines the superiority of a particular method
or research strategy.
o Students determine their own theoretical position on the basis of
substantiation.
o To know for sure must be doubted ferociously.
 Concept  abstract tern that describes a phenomenon.
 Law  regularity of facts (observations).
 Postulate  basic assumption in a theory.
 Proposition  explanatory relationship between concepts.
 Types of use of theories (distinction by Merton):
o Grand theories: abstract, very large scope
o Middle range theories: useful for empirical research, limited scope
o Background literature: focussed search for theories, empirical research,
limited scope
o Fact collection: hardly any theory, ad-hoc selection (when needed or
when there was a particular purpose)
 Induction (empirical  theoretical): verification logic  the form of reasoning,
in which from a limited number of observations a universal statement is made
about all cases.
 Deduction (theoretical  empirical): falsification logic  the form of reasoning,
in which from general statements predictions about observations are made.
 Verification logic (induction): A1, A2, A3, A4 and A5 have property P = all A
have property P.
 Falsification logic (deduction): all A have property P, K is an A = K has
property P.
 Inductive empirical cycle: observations before theory

Problem


Evaluation

Observation




Theory



Only after the observation you create a theory, mostly because you see it
occurs more often.  Then you evaluate your theory. (Continuing cycle)
 Induction problem: how many observations are needed to arrive at a valid
general statement?

, o Solution 1: use falsification logic, falsification is stronger than
verification.
o solution 2: use probability.
 Deductive empirical cycle: theory before observations
Problem


Evaluation Theory




Test Hypothesis


Observation

In a deductive empirical cycle, the problem you start with is more theoretical.
 In the theory we try to explain the problem.  The hypothesis is a part of
the theory (a statement) that we can actually test.  Only then we do
observations!  We test the hypothesis in our observation.  Evaluate if
there is falsification. (Continuing cycle)
 Induction is not tabula rasa (wiped clean): ‘open mind’
Two main points of criticism:
1. A-priori assumptions and selections are necessary, because there are too
much data.
2. Observations are influenced by conscious or unconscious assumptions
about certain facts.
 ‘Complete’ empirical cycle:

, ‘Complete’ empirical cycle in real life  pragmatic empirical cycle:

, Lecture 2, 02-11-2022
 Culture of poverty, Oscar Lewis (1959) lived with five families in Mexico.
 Generations poverty  People enter a culture of poverty.
 Culture of Poverty:
- Marginalized feeling: political and economic apathy.
- Attitude focused on the present: quick gain.
- Free sexual morals: free relationship forms, divorces and matrifocal
families. (Mother was central figure, children with different parents)
- Little participations in community and society.
 Reproduction of poverty. Not blaming the poor, he was trying to explain
how generations of poverty, led to a Culture of Poverty, led to a
reproduction of poverty, led to generations of poverty (circle).
 If people live in poverty for generations, it does something to the families.
 The main problem in this research is causality. Where does it start?
 How do we look for causality?  An experience (an intervention in a random
poor neighbourhood).
 Research design field experiment: the poverty (part where people get money),
the culture (part where people get “rich culture”), control group (nothing and
the poverty and culture (get both).
How do we start? Establish how people think about poverty now?
Pre-test/post-test design. Everywhere the same interview/survey.
Then the experiment  than the same test (post-test).
This is a classical experiment.
 Criteria to asses social scientific research
 Reliability: are measurements consistent? (Never talk about the research(ers),
only the measurements)
 Replicability: is the procedure explained clearly enough? (About the whole
research, not just the measurements)
 Validity: how accurate are findings? (Does A lead to B? How solid are the
conclusions?)
 FOLLOW BOOK, NOT INTERNET ON THESE DEFINITIONS!!
 Validity:
- Measurement/construct validity: are you measuring what you think you are
measuring?
- Internal validity: how unambiguous is A the cause of B? About causality.
- External validity: can results of the study be generalised to a larger
population?
- Ecological validity: are findings meaningful to everyday lives? Not about
populations but about reality.
 You can use validity’s as criteria, example of lecturer and daughter about the
‘deaf situation’.
 Back to the field experiment.
 Measurement validity in a field experiment: do you determine what you
determine? How do we measure the concept of poverty? Example, looking if
income is under a certain level. Or, access to clean water, poor housing, time
to spend on good things etc.  Samples of income.

Les avantages d'acheter des résumés chez Stuvia:

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Les clients de Stuvia ont évalués plus de 700 000 résumés. C'est comme ça que vous savez que vous achetez les meilleurs documents.

L’achat facile et rapide

L’achat facile et rapide

Vous pouvez payer rapidement avec iDeal, carte de crédit ou Stuvia-crédit pour les résumés. Il n'y a pas d'adhésion nécessaire.

Focus sur l’essentiel

Focus sur l’essentiel

Vos camarades écrivent eux-mêmes les notes d’étude, c’est pourquoi les documents sont toujours fiables et à jour. Cela garantit que vous arrivez rapidement au coeur du matériel.

Foire aux questions

Qu'est-ce que j'obtiens en achetant ce document ?

Vous obtenez un PDF, disponible immédiatement après votre achat. Le document acheté est accessible à tout moment, n'importe où et indéfiniment via votre profil.

Garantie de remboursement : comment ça marche ?

Notre garantie de satisfaction garantit que vous trouverez toujours un document d'étude qui vous convient. Vous remplissez un formulaire et notre équipe du service client s'occupe du reste.

Auprès de qui est-ce que j'achète ce résumé ?

Stuvia est une place de marché. Alors, vous n'achetez donc pas ce document chez nous, mais auprès du vendeur sophiebruinzeel. Stuvia facilite les paiements au vendeur.

Est-ce que j'aurai un abonnement?

Non, vous n'achetez ce résumé que pour 6,19 €. Vous n'êtes lié à rien après votre achat.

Peut-on faire confiance à Stuvia ?

4.6 étoiles sur Google & Trustpilot (+1000 avis)

85443 résumés ont été vendus ces 30 derniers jours

Fondée en 2010, la référence pour acheter des résumés depuis déjà 14 ans

Commencez à vendre!
6,19 €
  • (0)
  Ajouter