Garantie de satisfaction à 100% Disponible immédiatement après paiement En ligne et en PDF Tu n'es attaché à rien 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Examen

TPS3704 Assignment 50 Portfolio Semester 2 2025 - Due 19 September 2025

Note
-
Vendu
-
Pages
71
Grade
A+
Publié le
01-09-2025
Écrit en
2025/2026

TPS3704 Assignment 50 Portfolio Semester 2 2025 - Due 19 September 2025

Établissement
Cours











Oups ! Impossible de charger votre document. Réessayez ou contactez le support.

École, étude et sujet

Établissement
Cours

Infos sur le Document

Publié le
1 septembre 2025
Nombre de pages
71
Écrit en
2025/2026
Type
Examen
Contient
Questions et réponses

Sujets

Aperçu du contenu

TPS3704
PORTFOLIO 2025
DUE: 29 SEPT 2025 (MEMO)

,TPS3704/103/2025

MENTOR PAGE



MENTOR REPORT REGARDING: (Name of student)



BY TITLE: Mr./Ms./Mrs.

SURNAME: JACOBS

NAME: LAVURN



CONTACT DETAILS (those of the school if that is what you prefer):

Cell phone: 072749835

E-mail: Lavurn@gmail,com



Name: Lavurn

Qualifications: [B.Ed Senior Phase and FET, PGCE

Experience as a teacher: 15 years teaching experience in Senior Phase and FET

Experience as a mentor: 8 student teachers

Training as a mentor

(by whom and how much/ formal/informal, accredited or not):

Departmental mentor training workshop, 3 days - formal

Informal mentoring through school-based support programmes

,Comments



1. Was the general conduct of the student irreproachable (on time, conduct
according to school requirements for teachers)?

Yes, the student displayed professional behaviour at all times. She/he was punctual,
dressed appropriately, and followed the school’s code of conduct. The student showed
respect towards colleagues, learners, and management.



2. Was the student's level of subject knowledge sufficient for the presentation of
lessons?

Yes, the student demonstrated sound subject knowledge. Lesson presentations
reflected correct content and understanding of the curriculum. Where there were gaps,
the student showed willingness to research and clarify concepts.



3. Did the student use your suggestions and recommendations to improve her/his
work?

Yes, the student was open to feedback and implemented suggestions effectively.
Improvement was visible in lesson planning, teaching strategies, and classroom
management.



4. Did the student prepare well when she/he had to present lessons?

Yes, the student came well-prepared with lesson plans, teaching resources, and
activities suited to the learners’ level. Lessons were structured and learner-centred.

, 5. Did the student work regularly/ continuously on her/his portfolio?

Yes, the student worked on the portfolio consistently throughout the teaching practice.
Entries were updated on time, and evidence of reflection and improvement was noted.



Did the student complete her/his portfolio during the Practical Teaching period?

YES



Strong points of the student/ good qualities and good work done:

The student demonstrated strong classroom management skills and was able to
maintain discipline in a positive and respectful way. She/he prepared engaging lessons
using a variety of teaching methods that encouraged learner participation. The student
was committed, punctual, and displayed a professional attitude towards colleagues and
learners. Her/his willingness to accept feedback and implement suggestions was a key
strength.



Aspects on which the student still has to improve to be ready to enter education as a
beginner teacher:

The student still needs to improve time management during lessons to ensure that all
planned activities are completed effectively. More practice is needed in differentiating
tasks to meet the needs of learners at different levels of ability. The student should also
continue developing confidence in integrating technology and multimodal resources into
lessons to enhance learning.



SIGNATURE
€2,61
Accéder à l'intégralité du document:

Garantie de satisfaction à 100%
Disponible immédiatement après paiement
En ligne et en PDF
Tu n'es attaché à rien

Faites connaissance avec le vendeur

Seller avatar
Les scores de réputation sont basés sur le nombre de documents qu'un vendeur a vendus contre paiement ainsi que sur les avis qu'il a reçu pour ces documents. Il y a trois niveaux: Bronze, Argent et Or. Plus la réputation est bonne, plus vous pouvez faire confiance sur la qualité du travail des vendeurs.
Heartutor Teachme2-tutor
S'abonner Vous devez être connecté afin de suivre les étudiants ou les cours
Vendu
737
Membre depuis
2 année
Nombre de followers
46
Documents
244
Dernière vente
3 semaines de cela

3,9

101 revues

5
57
4
9
3
18
2
5
1
12

Récemment consulté par vous

Pourquoi les étudiants choisissent Stuvia

Créé par d'autres étudiants, vérifié par les avis

Une qualité sur laquelle compter : rédigé par des étudiants qui ont réussi et évalué par d'autres qui ont utilisé ce document.

Le document ne convient pas ? Choisis un autre document

Aucun souci ! Tu peux sélectionner directement un autre document qui correspond mieux à ce que tu cherches.

Paye comme tu veux, apprends aussitôt

Aucun abonnement, aucun engagement. Paye selon tes habitudes par carte de crédit et télécharge ton document PDF instantanément.

Student with book image

“Acheté, téléchargé et réussi. C'est aussi simple que ça.”

Alisha Student

Foire aux questions