Garantie de satisfaction à 100% Disponible immédiatement après paiement En ligne et en PDF Tu n'es attaché à rien 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Examen

FTCE ESE k-12

Note
-
Vendu
-
Pages
24
Grade
A+
Publié le
29-10-2024
Écrit en
2024/2025

Exam of 24 pages for the course FTCE ESE k-12 at FTCE ESE k-12 (FTCE ESE k-12)

Établissement
FTCE ESE K-12
Cours
FTCE ESE k-12










Oups ! Impossible de charger votre document. Réessayez ou contactez le support.

École, étude et sujet

Établissement
FTCE ESE k-12
Cours
FTCE ESE k-12

Infos sur le Document

Publié le
29 octobre 2024
Nombre de pages
24
Écrit en
2024/2025
Type
Examen
Contient
Questions et réponses

Sujets

Aperçu du contenu

FTCE ESE k-12 GRADE A Q&A
English - (correct answer)


IDEA - (correct answer)Individuals with Disabilities Act. Requires states to provide free,
appropriate public education for all students with disabilities who participate in special
education. The four main challenge areas: learning, social/emotional, motor skills, and
communication. The basic source of law for special education. Represents the latest
phase in the philosophy of educating children with disabilities



*Brown v. Board of Education, 1954 - (correct answer)Topeka, Kansas. Addressed the
inequality of "separate but equal" facilities on the basis of race. School segregation
became illegal.



*Diana v. The State Board of Education, 1970 - (correct answer)This case resulted in
the decision that all children must be tested in their native language



Wyatt v. Stickney, 1971 - (correct answer)Established the right to adequate treatment
(education) for institutionalized persons with mental retardation


*Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Citizens (PARC) v. Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania, 1972 - (correct answer)The first right to education lawsuit. Laid the
foundation for the right to education for all children with disabilities previously denied if
they had not attained a mental age of 5 by the start of first grade. Special Education
was guaranteed to children with mental retardation. The victory in this case sparked
other court cases for children with other disabilities.



*Mills v. Board of Education of the District of Columbia, 1972 - (correct answer)The right
to special education was extended to all children with disabilities, not just mentally
retarded children. Judgements in PARC and Mills paved the way for P.L. 94-142.
Students with disabilities must be given education regardless of the schools' financial
limitations.

,Public Law 93-112 (Rehabilitation Amendments of 1973) - (correct answer)The first
comprehensive federal statute to address specifically the rights of disabled youth. It
prohibited illegal discrimination in education, employment, or housing on the basis of a
disability.



Section 504, Rehabilitation Act of 1973 - (correct answer)Section 504 expands on older
law by extending its protection to other areas that receive federal assistance, such as
education. Protected individuals must (a) have a physical or mental impairment that
substantially limits one or more major life activities, such as self-care, walking, seeing,
breathing, working, or learning; (b) have a record of such an impairment; or (c) be
regarded as having such an impairment. A disability in itself is not sufficient grounds for
a complaint of discrimination. The person must be otherwise qualified, or able to meet,
the requirements of the program in question.



Public Law 93-380 (Education Amendments of 1974) - (correct answer)P.L.94-142 is the
funding portion of this act. It required states to provide full educational opportunities for
children with disabilities. It addressed identification, fair evaluation, alternative
placements, due process procedures, and free, appropriate public education.



Public Law 94-142 Education for all Handicapped Children Act), 1975 - (correct
answer)Provided for a free, appropriate public education for all children with disabilities,
defined special education and related services, and imposed rigid guidelines on the
provisions of those services. It paralleled the provision for a free and appropriate public
education in section 504 of Public Law 94-142 and extended these services to
preschool children with disabilities (ages 3-5) through provisions to preschool incentive
grants.


Seven fundamental provisions of IDEA - (correct answer)1. Free Appropriate Public
Education (FAPE)

2. Notification and procedural rights for parents.

3. Identification and services to all children

4. Necessary related services.

5. Individualized assessments
6. Individualized Education Plans (IEP's)

, 7. Least Restrictive Environment (LRE)



Goss v. Lopez, 1975 - (correct answer)This case ruled that the state could not deny a
student education without following due process. While this decision is not based on a
special education issue, the process of school suspension and expulsion is obviously
critical in assuring an appropriate public education to children with disabilities.



Public Law 95-56 (Gifted and Talented Children's Act), 1978 - (correct answer)This case
defined the gifted and talented population, and focused upon this exceptionally
category, which was not included in Public Law 94-142



*Larry P. V. Riles, 1979 - (correct answer)This case ordered the reevaluation of black
students enrolled in classes for educable mental retardation (EMR) and enjoined the
California State Department of Education from the use of intelligible tests in subsequent
EMR placement decisions.



Parents in Action on Special Education (PASE) v. Hannon, 1980 - (correct answer)Ruled
that IQ tests are necessarily biased against ethnic and racial subcultures.



Board of Education v. Rowley, 1982 - (correct answer)Amy Rowley was a deaf
elementary school student whose parents rejected their school district's proposal to
provide a tutor and speech therapist services to supplement their daughter's instruction
in the regular classroom. Her parents insisted on an interpreter even though Amy was
making satisfactory social, academic, and educational progress without one. In deciding
in favor of the school district, the Supreme Court ruled that school districts must provide
those services that permit a student with disabilities to benefit from instruction.
Essentially, the court ruled that the states are obligated to provide a "basic floor of
opportunity" that is reasonable to allow the child to benefit from social education.



Public Law 98-199 (Education of the Handicapped Act [EHA] Amendments), 1983 -
(correct answer)P.L. 94-142 was amended to provide added emphasis on parental
education and preschool, secondary, and post-secondary programs for children and
youth with disabilities.
€8,76
Accéder à l'intégralité du document:

Garantie de satisfaction à 100%
Disponible immédiatement après paiement
En ligne et en PDF
Tu n'es attaché à rien

Faites connaissance avec le vendeur
Seller avatar
douglasmugwe82
5,0
(1)

Faites connaissance avec le vendeur

Seller avatar
douglasmugwe82 Teachme2-tutor
S'abonner Vous devez être connecté afin de suivre les étudiants ou les cours
Vendu
2
Membre depuis
1 année
Nombre de followers
0
Documents
4239
Dernière vente
2 mois de cela
fully answered questions and answer

fully answered questions and answer

5,0

1 revues

5
1
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Récemment consulté par vous

Pourquoi les étudiants choisissent Stuvia

Créé par d'autres étudiants, vérifié par les avis

Une qualité sur laquelle compter : rédigé par des étudiants qui ont réussi et évalué par d'autres qui ont utilisé ce document.

Le document ne convient pas ? Choisis un autre document

Aucun souci ! Tu peux sélectionner directement un autre document qui correspond mieux à ce que tu cherches.

Paye comme tu veux, apprends aussitôt

Aucun abonnement, aucun engagement. Paye selon tes habitudes par carte de crédit et télécharge ton document PDF instantanément.

Student with book image

“Acheté, téléchargé et réussi. C'est aussi simple que ça.”

Alisha Student

Foire aux questions