Garantie de satisfaction à 100% Disponible immédiatement après paiement En ligne et en PDF Tu n'es attaché à rien 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Examen

CSL2601 ASSIGNMENT 01 ANSWERS SEMESTER 02 2024 DUE 10 SEPTEMBER 2024

Note
-
Vendu
-
Pages
7
Grade
A+
Publié le
06-09-2024
Écrit en
2024/2025

CSL2601 ASSIGNMENT 01 ANSWERS SEMESTER 02 2024 DUE 10 SEPTEMBER 2024 Assignment 2: CSL(2) Below is a draft academic article. You must complete the article by answering the two questions beneath the article. Your answers must use the same style as in the article and be no more than 1 500 words (both answers combined, including footnotes). You must reference your work and write in an academically acceptable manner, with properly constructed sentences/paragraphs. In the early 1990s when South Africa was contemplating transition to democracy, Wiechers advanced the case for the establishment of a constitutional court. He argued that this court would be able to protect and enforce human rights and liberties [and] to provide expert knowledge and the political as well as socio-economic understanding which is needed to judge intricate constitutional processes and issues.1 This view echoes the contemporary view that the Constitution2 that was designed to revolutionise the South African state reflects the needs and interests of all South Africans.3 In its articulation of a unique form of the separation of powers doctrine4 and in pursuit of ensuring a modern, robust constitutional democracy, the judiciary has viewed its role as complementary to (as opposed to distinct from) the legislative and executive branches of the state. As Corder remarks, in its first 15 years, the Constitutional Court’s judgments were ‘careful, wide, fair and at time courageous commitment to constitutional principle and practice’.5 So determined is the judiciary to uphold constitutional principle and practice that it has recently admonished the executive, with a court declaring that a particular government department was ‘grossly non-compliant’ and its representatives had shown up late for the court hearing.6 Some important developments in South African constitutional law are set out below. First, for the first time in South Africa’s history, two judges and the Public Protector were impeached. South Africa also has a multi-party government for the first time since the advent of democracy thirty years ago. _________________ 1 Marinus Wiechers ‘A constitutional court for South Africa’ in DJ van Vuuren et al South Africa in the Nineties (1991) HSRC Publisher 290. 2 Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996. 3 Pierre de Vos & Warren Freedman (eds) et al South African Constitutional Law in Context (2 ed Oxford University Press 2021) 26-27. 4 de Lange v Smuts NO 1998 (3) SA 785 (CC) para 60. 5 Hugh Corder ‘South Africa’s Constitutional Court at 30: a solid foundation but cracks are showing’ The Conversation (14 April 2024) < 6 National Department of Public Works v Fani and 77 Others [Collectively referred to as ‘Residents of Farm Greydel (Airport Park)] and Another [2024] ZASCA 43 (8 April 2024) para 5. Question 1 To provide context, define South African constitutional law. In your own words, with reference to provisions of the Constitution, case law and examples, explain South African constitutional law. (10) Question 2 What principle/doctrine in South African constitutional law is implied by the reference to the executive showing up late to court and not complying with its obligations? Explain this clearly with reference to appropriate theory and relevant case law. (10)

Montrer plus Lire moins
Établissement
Cours









Oups ! Impossible de charger votre document. Réessayez ou contactez le support.

École, étude et sujet

Établissement
Cours

Infos sur le Document

Publié le
6 septembre 2024
Nombre de pages
7
Écrit en
2024/2025
Type
Examen
Contient
Questions et réponses

Sujets

Aperçu du contenu

RONSAM
TUTORS
CSL2601 ASSIGNMENT 02 SEMESTER 02
10 SEPTEMBER 2024




DISCLAIMER!!!: The assignments sold through this website
are intended for research, study, and reference purposes
only. They are not to be submitted as your own work. Only
use this document as reference to generate your own
assignment


FOR EXAMS, PORTFOLIO, AND ASSIGNMENT ASSISTANCE
WHATSAPP 0671189059 EMAIL:


, Question 1
To provide context, define South African constitutional law. In your own words,
with reference to provisions of the Constitution, case law and examples,
explain South African constitutional law. (10)
South African Constitutional Law can be understood as the body of law that governs
the legal principles, rules, and norms that constitute the foundation of the state’s
legal framework. It encompasses the interpretation, application, and enforcement of
the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 ("the Constitution"), which is
the supreme law of the country. The Constitution sets out the fundamental principles
of governance, human rights, and the rule of law, and establishes the institutions of
government, their powers, functions, and limitations.

The Constitution is the central document that provides the framework for all law and
legal proceedings in South Africa. Section 2 of the Constitution explicitly states that
the Constitution is the "supreme law of the Republic," and that "law or conduct
inconsistent with it is invalid.” 1This provision establishes the Constitution as the
ultimate authority in all legal matters, overriding any conflicting statutory or common
law.

South African constitutional law also deals with the structure and functions of the
government, particularly the doctrine of the separation of powers, which divides
government authority among the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. The
separation of powers is crucial in ensuring that no single branch of government
exercises absolute power. In the landmark case of De Lange v Smuts NO, the
Constitutional Court reaffirmed that the separation of powers is an established
principle and a fundamental component of South Africa's constitutional democracy. 2
This case underscored the judiciary's role in maintaining checks and balances on the
other branches of government, highlighting the unique form of separation of powers
envisaged by the Constitution.

Furthermore, the Constitution enshrines a comprehensive Bill of Rights in Chapter 2,
which articulates the fundamental rights and freedoms of all people in South Africa.



1
Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, s 2.
2
De Lange v Smuts NO 1998 (3) SA 785 (CC).
€2,72
Accéder à l'intégralité du document:

Garantie de satisfaction à 100%
Disponible immédiatement après paiement
En ligne et en PDF
Tu n'es attaché à rien

Faites connaissance avec le vendeur

Seller avatar
Les scores de réputation sont basés sur le nombre de documents qu'un vendeur a vendus contre paiement ainsi que sur les avis qu'il a reçu pour ces documents. Il y a trois niveaux: Bronze, Argent et Or. Plus la réputation est bonne, plus vous pouvez faire confiance sur la qualité du travail des vendeurs.
VBPSEDUPROS SN Tutors
S'abonner Vous devez être connecté afin de suivre les étudiants ou les cours
Vendu
723
Membre depuis
2 année
Nombre de followers
473
Documents
221
Dernière vente
1 semaine de cela
VBPS EDUPROS

Exams, assignment solutions and study notes

4,1

114 revues

5
69
4
13
3
16
2
4
1
12

Récemment consulté par vous

Pourquoi les étudiants choisissent Stuvia

Créé par d'autres étudiants, vérifié par les avis

Une qualité sur laquelle compter : rédigé par des étudiants qui ont réussi et évalué par d'autres qui ont utilisé ce document.

Le document ne convient pas ? Choisis un autre document

Aucun souci ! Tu peux sélectionner directement un autre document qui correspond mieux à ce que tu cherches.

Paye comme tu veux, apprends aussitôt

Aucun abonnement, aucun engagement. Paye selon tes habitudes par carte de crédit et télécharge ton document PDF instantanément.

Student with book image

“Acheté, téléchargé et réussi. C'est aussi simple que ça.”

Alisha Student

Foire aux questions