LEGL 2700- test 4 cases, Roessing Exam Questions and Answers | 100% Pass Rate
Alli v. US (2008) - Answer ️️ -Dr. Alli and his wife claimed the corporate structure shielded them from decision made in the name of the corporation -The court concluded that Alli did not act as though the corporation was independent from their personal assets -the court also found that tho corporation form had been used to commit a wrong by failing to adhere to obligations to keep the properties decent and safe for tenants Winner: US Burwell v. Hobby Lobby (2014) - Answer ️️ court found that closely held corporations are "persons" within the Religious Freedoms Restoration Act Winner: Hobby Lobby Federal Communications Commission v. AT&T Inc. (2011) - Answer ️️ -AT&T wanted protection by personal privacy -Even though a corporation is treated the same as an individual under most aspects of the law, there are some rights only an individual can possess -the court determined that corporations do not have privacy rights, at least in the way intended by congress Winner: FCC
École, étude et sujet
- Établissement
- LEGL 2700 ROESSING
- Cours
- LEGL 2700 ROESSING
Infos sur le Document
- Publié le
- 15 janvier 2024
- Nombre de pages
- 5
- Écrit en
- 2023/2024
- Type
- Examen
- Contient
- Questions et réponses
Sujets
-
legl 2700 test 4 cases roessing exam questions
Document également disponible en groupe