Nursing Interventions & Clinical Skills 7th Edition Test Bank | Complete Practice Q&A for Perry Potter

INSTUCTOR MANUAL FOR M M


Law for Business 15e Barnes
M M M M



Chapter 1-47 M




CHAPTER 1: LAW AND LEGAL REASONING
M M M M M




LECTUREMOUTLINE

1. DiscussMtheMTwisdaleMcaseMthatMopensMthisMchapter.MItMprovidesManMinterestingMvehicle
MforMdiscussingMtheMfunctionsMofMlawMandMlegalMinterpretation.




a. HaveMyourMstudentsMidentifyMtheMvariousMfunctionsMofMtheMlawMandMthenMdiscussMwhich
MspecificMfunctionsMareMfurtheredMbyMthisMantiretaliationMaspectsMofMtheMCivilMRightsMsta

tute.

b. InMtheMcontextMofMlegalMinterpretation,MtheMcourtMfoundMthatMTwisdaleMdidMseemMtoMbeMp
rotectedMbasedMonMtheMliteralMlanguageMofMtheMstatute.MHowever,MitMlookedMbeyondMtheM
plainMmeaningMtoMrejectMhisMclaim.MSpecifically,MtheMcourtMbelievedMthatMinterpretingMth
eMlawMinMaMmannerMthatMwouldMprotectMhimMfromMretaliationMwouldMundermineMtheMpurp
oseMofMtheMstatute.MItMisMconceivableMthatMtheMcourtMisMmotivatedMbyMpublicMpolicyMconc
ernsMasM well.

c. WhatMdoMyourMstudentsMthinkMofMcourtsMwhoMdoMlookMatMintentMandMpublicMpolicy?MUse
MthisMasMaMlead-inMforMaMdiscussionMofMlegalMjurisprudence.




2. QuestionMstudentsMaboutMtheirMdefinitionsMofM―law.‖MMakeMcertainMtheyMunderstandM
theMimportanceMofMlawMinMallMaspectsMofMourMlives.

3. DiscussMtheMvariousMfunctionsMthatMlawMservesMinMsociety.MYouMmightMdoMthisMbyMhavin
gMtheMstudentsMidentifyMsomeMofMthem.

a. DiscussMtheMconflictsMthatMariseMbetweenMandMamongMtheMvariousMfunctionsMofMlaw.MFor
Mexample,MthereMoftenMareMconflicts MbetweenMtheMgoalsMofMindividualMfreedomMandMachie

vingMsocialMjustice.MNoteMtheMproblemsMthatMariseMwhenMthereMisMnoMclearMconsensusMon
MwhatMisMjust.




b. AskMtheMstudentsMifMtheyMthinkMthatMlawMeverMisM―overused.‖MTheyMareMlikelyMtoMciteMn
umerousMexamples.MForMinstance,MthisMmightMbeMaMtimeMtoMtalkMaboutMtheMproductMliabil
ityMcasesMthatMareMregularlyMinMtheMheadlines.MPerhapsMtheMcaseMinvolvingMtheMwomanM
whoMburnedMherselfMwithMcoffeeMfromMMcDonald’sMwouldMbeMappropriateMhere.



1-1

©MMcGrawMHillMLLC.MAllMrightsMreserved.MNoMreproductionMorMdistributionMwithoutMtheMpriorMwrittenMco
nsentMofMMcGrawMHillMLLC.

, c. HaveMtheMstudentsMdiscussMwhatMitMmeansMtoMhaveMtheMlawMmaintainMorder.MYouMmight
MaskMstudentsMifMmaintainingMorderMmeansMmaintainingMtheMstatusMquo.MThisMcanMleadM

toMaMdiscussionMofMlegalMrealismMandMviewsMthatMlawMisMusedMbyMthoseMinMpowerMtoMret
ainMtheirMpower.

4. ThereMisMaMtendencyMforMpeopleMtoMthinkMofMlawMasMimposingMdutiesMwithoutMconsideringMh
owMitMestablishesMandMpreservesMrights.MTalkMaboutMhowMourMsystemMtriesMtoMmatchMrightsM
withMcorrespondingMduties.

a. ExplainMhowMduties,Mrights,MandMprivilegesMmakeMupMsubstantiveMlaw.

b. ExplainMthatMproceduralMlawMprovidesMtheMframeworkMwithinMwhichMsubstantiveMlawsM
areMcreatedMandMenforced.MPointMoutMthatMChaptersM2MandM4MofferMaMmoreMdetailedMdiscu
ssionMofMproceduralMlaw.

5. AskMtheMstudentsMtoMthinkMofManMexampleMofMaMdutyMimposedMbyMsubstantiveMlawMthatMmigh
tMviolateMsomeMmoralMorMethicalMbelief.MThisMmightMbeMaMgoodMtimeMtoMtalkMaboutMtheMvario
usMschoolsMofMlegalMjurisprudence.MHaveMthemMspeculateMhowMaMlegalMpositivistMwouldMdiff
erMfromMaMlegalMsociologistMorMnaturalMlawMtheoristMinMhandlingMsuchMsituations.

6. ContrastMcriminalMlawMwithMcivilMlaw.

a. PointMoutMthatMsocietyMconsidersMitMmuchMworseMtoMbeMconvictedMofMaMcrimeMthanMtoMbe
MheldMcivillyMliable.MExplainMhow,MasMaMresult,MthereMareMmoreMexactingMproceduralMsaf

eguardsMtoMprotectMaMdefendantMinMaMcriminalMtrialMthanMinMaMcivilMtrial.

b. NoteMtheMdifferenceMbetweenMcompensatoryMdamagesMandMpunitiveMdamages.MDiscussM
theMcurrentMuproarMoverMpunitiveMdamagesMandMtheMSupremeMCourt’sMattemptMtoMreinMt
hemMin.MSeeMStateMFarmMMutualMAutomobileMInsuranceMv.MCampbell,M123MS.Ct.M1513M
(U.S.MSup.MCt.M2003)M(establishingMguidepostsMforMcalculatingMpunitiveMdamages).MPun
itiveMdamagesMareMdiscussedMfurtherMinMChapterM6.

c. PointMoutMthatMoftenMoneMcanMbeMsubjectMtoMsanctionsMunderMbothMcriminalMandMcivilM
lawsMwithoutMviolatingMtheMproscriptionMagainstM―doubleMjeopardy.‖MFindMoutMifMthe
MstudentsMthinkMthatMpunitiveMdamagesMinMaMcivilMtrial,McoupledMwithMfinesMinMaMcrimi

nalMtrial,MconstituteMaMtypeMofMdoubleMjeopardy.

MarinelloMv.MUnitedMStates

MarinelloMwasMchargedMwithMtheMcrimeMofMcorruptlyMimpedingMtheMdueMadministrationMofMtheMTa
xMCodeMafterMheMengagedMinMseveralMactivitiesMthatMunderreportedMhisMtaxableMincome.MHowever,
Mthe

U.S.MSupremeMCourtMoverturnedMhisMcriminalMconvictionMbecauseMMarinelloMwasMunawareMthatMh
eMwasMunderMIRSMinvestigationMatMtheMtimeMofMhisMactivities.MCitingMtheMneedMtoMconstrueMcrimin

1-2

©MMcGrawMHillMLLC.MAllMrightsMreserved.MNoMreproductionMorMdistributionMwithoutMtheMpriorMwrittenMco
nsentMofMMcGrawMHillMLLC.

,al




1-3

©MMcGrawMHillMLLC.MAllMrightsMreserved.MNoMreproductionMorMdistributionMwithoutMtheMpriorMwrittenMco
nsentMofMMcGrawMHillMLLC.

, statutesMnarrowly,MtheMCourtMruledMthatMtheMparticularMstatute—theMOmnibusMClause—
didMnotMcoverMallMactivitiesMthatMunderreportedMincome.MTheMCourtMbelievedMthatMtheMstatuteMcov
eredMaMnarrowerMrangeMofMactivitiesMaimedMdirectlyMatMthwartingMtheMactivitiesMofMinvestigationsM
whenMtheMtaxpayerMknewMorMshouldMhaveMknownManMinvestigationMwasMunderway.

PointsMforMDiscussion:MThisMcaseMisMplacedMinMtheMtextMasManMexampleMofMtheMgeneralMrulesMund
erlyingMcriminalMlaw.MSpecifically,MaMpersonMgenerallyMcannotMbeMconvictedMofMaMcrimeMunlessM
heMorMsheMviolatesMaMstatute.MHowever,MsuchMstatutesMmustMbeMobjectivelyMclearMtoMaMreasonabl
eMperson.MThisMGovernment’sMinterpretationMofMthisMstatuteMwasMbelievedMtoMgrantMtheMGovern
mentMtooMmuchMdiscretionMinMdeterminingMwhatMconstitutedMaMcrime.

7. TheMbriefMintroductionMtoMourMlegalMsystemMshouldMbeMaMreviewMforMmostMstudents.

a. TheMconstitutionalMlawMmaterialMisMmoreMheavilyMdiscussedMinMChapterM4.MAnMargumentM
canMbeMmadeMforMitMtoMbeMpresentedMimmediatelyMfollowingMthisMchapter.MHowever,Mwe
MbelieveMstudentsMshouldMfirstMreviewMChapterM2’sMdiscussionMofMtheMdisputeMresolutionM

system.

b. TalkMaboutMtheMroleMofMtheMcourtsMinMdeterminingMtheMconstitutionalityMofMlegislation.
MDoMtheyMbelieveMthisMgivesMtheMcourtsMtooMmuchMpower?




c. ExplainMtheMrelationshipMbetweenMstateMlawsMandMfederalMlaws.MMakeMcertainMtheMstude
ntsMunderstandMthatMstateMlawsMmayMnotMviolateMtheMfederalMconstitutionMandMmustMbeMco
nsistentMwithMfederalMstatutes.

HenryMScheinMv.MArcherM&MWhiteMSales

TheMFederalMArbitrationMActMprovidesMthatMpartiesMmay,MthroughMtheirMpowerMtoMcontract,MagreeM
thatMtheirMdisputesMwillMbeMarbitrated.MInMaddition,MtheMActMallowsMthoseMsameMpartiesMtoMagreeMt
hatManMarbitrator,MratherMthanMaMcourt,MwillMdetermineMwhetherMthatMarbitrationMclauseMappliesMto
ManyMparticularMdisputeMtheyMmayMhave.MHowever,MseveralMfederalMappellateMcourtsMcarved MoutMaM

―whollyMgroundless‖MexceptionMtoMtheMlatterMruleMbyMwhichMtheyMallowedMcourtsMtoMconcludeMt
hatMarbitrationMwasMnotMappropriateMwhenMtheMcourtMbelievedMtheMclaimMofMarbitrabilityMwasMgro
undless.MInMthisMcase,MtheMU.S.MSupremeMCourt,McitingMbothMtheMstatuteMandMSupremeMCourtMprec
edent,MruledMthatMthe
―whollyMgroundless‖MexceptionMwasMimpermissibleMbecauseMitMcontradictedMtheMstatute.

PointsMforMDiscussion:MThisMcaseMisManMexampleMofMtheMlimitsMonMtheMjudiciary’sMdiscretionMu
nderMtheMcommonMlaw.MItMillustratesMthatMinMtheMhierarchyMofMlaws,MlegislativeMlawMisMsuperior
MtoMjudge-MmadeMlaw.MItMalsoMillustratesMtheMroleMofMprecedentMinMinterpretingMstatutes.




8. TheMmaterialMonMstatutoryMinterpretationMcanMbeMextremelyMimportantMinMlayingMtheMfoundat
ionMforMhowMlawyersMthink.MMoreMimportantly,MitMteachesMstudentsMvaluableMcriticalMthinkin
gMskills.MTakeMtheMstudentsMthroughMtheMprocessMforMinterpretingMstatutes.MYouMmayMdiscuss
1-4

©MMcGrawMHillMLLC.MAllMrightsMreserved.MNoMreproductionMorMdistributionMwithoutMtheMpriorMwrittenMco
nsentMofMMcGrawMHillMLLC.