100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Examen

Test Bank for Advanced Health Assessment & Clinical Diagnosis in Primary Care 6th Edition Dains

Puntuación
-
Vendido
-
Páginas
218
Grado
A+
Subido en
01-09-2025
Escrito en
2025/2026

Test Bank for Advanced Health Assessment & Clinical Diagnosis in Primary Care 6th Edition Dains Test Bank for Advanced Health Assessment & Clinical Diagnosis in Primary Care 6th Edition Dains Test Bank for Advanced Health Assessment & Clinical Diagnosis in Primary Care 6th Edition Dains

Mostrar más Leer menos
Institución
Advanced Health Assessment & Clinica
Grado
Advanced Health Assessment & Clinica











Ups! No podemos cargar tu documento ahora. Inténtalo de nuevo o contacta con soporte.

Libro relacionado

Escuela, estudio y materia

Institución
Advanced Health Assessment & Clinica
Grado
Advanced Health Assessment & Clinica

Información del documento

Subido en
1 de septiembre de 2025
Número de páginas
218
Escrito en
2025/2026
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas

Temas

Vista previa del contenido

TEST BANK nn




ADVANCED HEALTH ASSESSMENT & CLINICAL
nn nn nn nn


DIAGNOSIS INPRIMARY CARE, 6TH EDITION
nn nn n nn nn nn




Joyce E. Dains, Linda Ciofu Baumann & Pamela Scheibel
nn nn nn nn nn nn nn nn

, l O M oA R cP S D | 1 2 6




nn 56 7




nn
nn 13




Test Bank for Advanced Health Assessment & Clinical Diagnosis in
nn nn nn nn nn nn nn nn nn


Primary Care6th Edition Dains nn nn n nn nn




Chapter nn1: nnClinical nnReasoning, nnDifferential nnDiagnosis, nnEvidence-Based nnPractice, nnand nnSymptom

AnalysisM
nn n ultiple nnChoice
Identify nnthe nnchoice nnthat nnbest nncompletes nnthe nnstatement nnor nnanswers nnthe nnquestion.
nn 1. Which nntype nnof nnclinical nndecision-making nnis nnmost nnreliable?
A. Intuitive
B. Analytical
C. Experiential
D. Augenblick

nn 2. Which nnof nnthe nnfollowing nnis nnfalse? nnTo nnobtain nnadequate nnhistory, nn health-care nnproviders nnmust nnbe:
A. Methodical nnand nnsystematic
B. Attentive nnto nnthe nnpatient’s nnverbal nnand nnnonverbal
nnlanguage

C. Able nnto nnaccurately nninterpret nn the nnpatient’s
nnresponses
D. Adept nnat nnreading nninto nnthe nnpatient’s nnstatements

nn 3. Essential nnparts nnof nna nnhealth nnhistory nninclude nnall nn of nnthe nnfollowing nnexcept:
A. Chief nncomplaint
B. History nnof nnthe nnpresent nnillness
C. Current nnvital nnsigns
D. All nn of nnthe nnabove nnare nnessential nnhistory
nncomponents


nn 4. Which nnof nnthe nnfollowing nnis nnfalse? nnWhile nnperforming nnthe nnphysical nn examination, nnthe nnexaminer nnmust nnbe nnable nnto:
A. Differentiate nnbetween nnnormal nnand nnabnormal nnfindings
B. Recall nnknowledge nnof nna nnrange nnof nnconditions nnand nntheir nnassociated nnsigns
nnand nnsymptoms
C. Recognize nnhow nncertain nnconditions nnaffect nn the nnresponse nnto nnother nnconditions
D. Foresee nnunpredictable nnfindings

nn 5. The nnfollowing nnis nnthe nnleast nnreliable nnsource nnof nninformation nnfor nn diagnostic nnstatistics:
A. Evidence-based nninvestigations
B. Primary nnreports nn of nnresearch
C. Estimation nnbased nnon nna nnprovider’s
nnexperience
D. Published nnmeta-analyses

nn 6. The nnfollowing nncan nnbe nnused nnto nnassist nnin nnsound nnclinical nndecision-making:
A. Algorithm nnpublished nnin nna nnpeer-reviewed nnjournal
nnarticle

B. Clinical nnpractice nnguidelines
C. Evidence-based nnresearch
D. All nnof nnthe nnabove

nn 7. If nna nndiagnostic nnstudynnhas nnhigh nnsensitivity, n n this nnindicates nna:
A. High nnpercentage nnof nnpersons nnwith nnthe nngiven nncondition nnwill nnhave nnan
nnabnormal nnresult

B. Low nnpercentage nnof nnpersons nnwith nnthe nngiven nncondition nnwill nnhave nnan
nnabnormal nnresult
C. Low nnlikelihood nnof nnnormal nnresult nnin nnpersons nnwithout nna nngiven nncondition
D. None nnof nnthe nnabove

nn 8. If nna nndiagnostic nnstudy nnhas nnhigh nnspecificity, n n this nnindicates nna:
A. Low nnpercentage nnof nnhealthy nnindividuals nn will nnshow nna nnnormal nnresult
B. High nnpercentage nn of nnhealthy nnindividuals nnwill nnshow nna nnnormal nnresult
C. High nnpercentage nnof nnindividuals nnwith nna nndisorder nnwill nnshow nna
nnnormal nnresult

D. Low nnpercentage nnof nnindividuals nnwith nna nndisorder nnwill nnshow nnan
nnabnormal nnresult


nn 9. A nnlikelihood nn ratio nnabove nn1 nnindicates nnthat nna nndiagnostic nntest nnshowing nna:
A. Positive nnresult nnis nnstrongly nnassociated nnwith nnthe nndisease
B. Negative nnresult nnis nnstrongly nnassociated nnwith nnabsence nnof
nnthe nndisease

C. Positive nnresult nnis nnweakly nnassociated nnwith nnthe nndisease
D. Negative nnresult nnis nn weakly nnassociated nnwith nnabsence nnof
nnthe nndisease


nn 10. Which nnof nnthe nnfollowing nnclinical nnreasoning nntools nnis nndefined nnas nnevidence-based nnresource nnbased nnon nnmathematical

, l O M oA R cP S D | 1 2 6




nn
nn modeling nn
56 7




to nnexpress nnthe nnlikelihood nn of nna nncondition nnin nnselect nnsituations,
nn nnsettings, nnand/or nnpatients?
13

, l O M oA R cP S D | 1 2 6




nn 56 7




nn
nn 13




A. Clinical nnpractice
nnguideline

B. Clinical nndecision nnrule
C. Clinical nnalgorithm
Chapter nn1: nnClinical nnreasoning, nndifferential nndiagnosis, nnevidence-based nnpractice, nnand nnsymptom nnana
Answer nnSection

MULTIPLE nnCHOICE

1. ANS: B
Croskerry nn(2009) nndescribes nntwo nnmajor nntypes nnof nnclinical nndiagnostic nndecision-making: nnintuitive nnand nnanalytical.
nnIntuitive nndecision- nnmaking nn(similar nnto nnAugenblink nndecision-making) nnis nnbased nnon nnthe nnexperience nnand

nnintuition nnof nnthe nnclinician nnand nnis nnless nnreliable nnandnpaired nnwith nnfairly nncommon nnerrors. nnIn nncontrast, nnanalytical

nndecision-making nnis nnbased nnon nncareful nnconsideration nnand nnhas nngreater nnreliability nnwith nnrare nnerrors.



PTS: 1
2. ANS: D
To nnobtain nnadequate nnhistory, nnproviders nnmust nnbe nnwell nnorganized, nnattentive nnto nnthe nnpatient’s nnverbal nnand nnnonverbal
nnlanguage, nnand nnablento nnaccurately nninterpret nnthe nnpatient’s nnresponses nnto nnquestions. nnRather nnthan nnreading nninto nnthe

nnpatient’s nnstatements, nnthey nnclarify nnany nnareas nnof nnuncertainty.



PTS: 1
3. ANS: C
Vital nnsigns nnare nnpart nnof nnthe nnphysical nnexamination nnportion nnof nnpatient nnassessment, nnnot nnpart nnof nnthe nnhealth nnhistory.

PTS: 1
4. ANS: D
While nnperforming nnthe nnphysical nnexamination, nnthe nnexaminer nnmust nnbe nnable nnto nndifferentiate nnbetween nnnormal nnand
nnabnormal nnfindings, nnrecall nnknowledge nnof nna nnrange nnof nnconditions, nnincluding nntheir nnassociated nnsigns nnand

nnsymptoms, nnrecognize nnhow nncertain nnconditions nnaffectnthe nnresponse nnto nnother nnconditions, nnand nndistinguish nnthe

nnrelevance nn of nnvaried nnabnormal nnfindings.



PTS: 1
5. ANS: C
Sources nnfor nndiagnostic nnstatistics nninclude nntextbooks, nnprimary nnreports nnof nnresearch, nnand nnpublished nnmeta-analyses.
nnAnother nnsource nnofnstatistics, nnthe nnone nnthat nnhas nnbeen nnmost nnwidely nnused nnand nnavailable nnfor nnapplication nn to nnthe

nnreasoning nnprocess, nnis nnthe nnestimation nnbased nnon nna nnprovider’s nnexperience, nnalthough nnthese nnare nnrarely nnaccurate.

nnOver nnthe nnpast nndecade, nnthe nnavailability nnof nnevidence nnon nnwhich nnto nnbase nnclinical nnreasoning nnis nnimproving, n n and

nnthere nnis nnan nnincreasing nnexpectation nnthat nnclinical nnreasoning nnbe nnbased nnon nnscientific nnevidence.

Evidence-based nnstatistics nnare nnalso nnincreasingly nnbeing nnused nnto nndevelop nnresources nnto nnfacilitate nnclinical nn decision-making.

PTS: 1
6. ANS: D
To nnassist nnin nnclinical nndecision-making, nna nnnumber nnof nnevidence-based nnresources nnhave nnbeen nndeveloped nnto nnassist
nnthe nnclinician.nResources, nnsuch nnas nnalgorithms nnand nnclinical nnpractice nnguidelines, nnassist nnin nnclinical nnreasoning nnwhen

nnproperly nnapplied.



PTS: 1
7. ANS: A
The nnsensitivity nnof nna nndiagnostic nnstudy nnis nnthe nnpercentage nnof nnindividuals nnwith nnthe nntarget nncondition nnwho nnshow
nnan nnabnormal, nnor nnpositive,nresult. nnA nnhigh nnsensitivity nnindicates nnthat nna nngreater nnpercentage nnof nnpersons nn with nnthe

nngiven nn condition nn will nnhave nnan nnabnormal nnresult.



PTS: 1
8. ANS: B
The nnspecificity nnof nna nndiagnostic nnstudy nnis nnthe nnpercentage nnof nnnormal, nnhealthy nnindividuals nnwho nnhave nna
nnnormal nnresult. nnThe nngreater nnthenspecificity, nnthe nngreater nnthe nnpercentage nnof nnindividuals nnwho nnwill nnhave

nnnegative, nnor nnnormal, nnresults nnif nnthey nndo nnnot nnhave nnthe nntarget nncondition.



PTS: 1
9. ANS: A
The nnlikelihood nnratio nnis nnthe nnprobability nnthat nna nnpositive nntest nnresult nnwill nnbe nnassociated nnwith nna nnperson nnwho nnhas
nnthe nntarget nncondition nnand nnannegative nnresult nnwill nnbe nnassociated nnwith nna nnhealthy nnperson. nnA nnlikelihood nnratio

nnabove nn1 nnindicates nnthat nna nnpositive nnresult nnis nnassociated nnwith nnthe nndisease; nna nnlikelihood nnratio nnless nnthan nn1

nnindicates nnthat nna nnnegative nn result nnis nnassociated nnwith nnan nnabsence nnof nnthe nndisease.
$15.99
Accede al documento completo:

100% de satisfacción garantizada
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Tanto en línea como en PDF
No estas atado a nada

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
Edunursepro NURSING, ECONOMICS, MATHEMATICS, BIOLOGY, AND HISTORY MATERIALS BEST TUTORING, HOMEWORK HELP, EXAMS, TESTS, AND STUDY GUIDE MATERIALS WITH GUARANTEED A+ I am a dedicated medical practitioner with diverse knowledge in matters
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
67
Miembro desde
10 meses
Número de seguidores
5
Documentos
6109
Última venta
1 día hace

4.3

33 reseñas

5
24
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
3

Recientemente visto por ti

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes