100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Resumen

Summary SCMT 508SCMT 508 Write a paper that discusses the contributing factors of negligent hiring

Puntuación
-
Vendido
-
Páginas
6
Subido en
25-01-2025
Escrito en
2024/2025

SCMT 508SCMT 508 Write a paper that discusses the contributing factors of negligent hiring and retention an employer can face by using weak or faulty screening practicesAssignment 1 - FaultyScreening PracticesDiscuss the contributing factors of negligent hiring and retention an employer can face by using weak or faulty screening practices.1Negligent hiring is a legal claim by an injured individual against an employer based on idea that the employer did know or should’ve known their employees background especially if the employee had a hazy background. Companies have a duty to screen individuals of high character and with clean backgrounds to prevent hiring individuals with questionable backgrounds. If a company hires an employee with questionable background and there is an incident involving that employee, then that company is ultimately responsible. Incidents that could occur incl

Mostrar más Leer menos
Institución
Grado









Ups! No podemos cargar tu documento ahora. Inténtalo de nuevo o contacta con soporte.

Escuela, estudio y materia

Institución
Grado

Información del documento

Subido en
25 de enero de 2025
Número de páginas
6
Escrito en
2024/2025
Tipo
Resumen

Temas

Vista previa del contenido

Assignment 1 – Faulty Screening Practices

SCMT 508

SCMT 508 Write a paper that discusses the contributing factors of negligent hiring and retention an employer can face by using
weak or faulty screening practices




Assignment 1 - Faulty
Screening Practices




Discuss the contributing factors of negligent hiring and retention an employer can face by
using weak or faulty screening practices.


1

, Assignment 1 – Faulty Screening Practices

Negligent hiring is a legal claim by an injured individual against an employer based on idea

that the employer did know or should’ve known their employees background especially if the

employee had a hazy background. Companies have a duty to screen individuals of high

character and with clean backgrounds to prevent hiring individuals with questionable

backgrounds. If a company hires an employee with questionable background and there is an

incident involving that employee, then that company is ultimately responsible. Incidents that

could occur include threat to fellow employees, members of the public and overall workplace

safety. A company’s failure to conduct a proper background check is a common way to prove

negligent hiring.

One example of negligent hiring is the Navy Yard shooting that occurred on September 16,

2013 by an employee named Aaron Alexis (Tkachuk, 2013). Aaron Alexis was a Navy reservist

and contracted by the Navy to work on its information technology systems. He showed up to

work on September 16, 2013 with a shotgun disassembled in a bag that was slung over his

shoulder. Once he checked into work, he slipped into a restroom, assembled his shotgun and

started his rampage which lasted well over an hour. Police agencies responded promptly and in a

subsequent firefight were able to eradicate Mr. Alexis at the cost of twelve employees who were

killed, and numerous others injured. Further investigation by authorities revealed that the

government granted Mr. Alexis a security clearance despite the red flags in his background.

These issues in his background consisted of multiple run ins with several police departments and

had failed to mention these incidents during his background check. This is a clear example of

negligent hiring and the company was held liable by the federal government.

Contributing factors of retention




2
$7.99
Accede al documento completo:

100% de satisfacción garantizada
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Tanto en línea como en PDF
No estas atado a nada

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
newage Uop
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
22
Miembro desde
3 año
Número de seguidores
15
Documentos
4723
Última venta
6 meses hace
A+ Self prepared Study guides for my peers

Truly helpful study guides

4.2

6 reseñas

5
3
4
1
3
2
2
0
1
0

Recientemente visto por ti

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes