A +
Question
The Jaga v Dönges 1950 (4) SA 653 (A), which was delivered at the height of apartheid, remains important for the interpretation
of statutes after the democratic transformation. Kindly read the case and answer the following questions.
(a) BRIEFLY PROVIDE facts of the Jaga case. (6)
(b) NAME AND DISCUSS the dominant interpretive approach before 1994 as followed by the majority in Jaga; (14)
(c) NAME and DISCUSS the alternative interpretive approach as followed by the minority in Jaga; (15)
(d) DISCUSS the effect of Section 39(2) of the Constitution and the new interpretive approach followed in Bato Star Fishing
(Pty) Ltd v Minister of Environmental Affairs 2004 (4) SA 490 (CC); (15)
DISTINCTION Footnotes and/or Bibliography
GUARANTEED!!! included. *
Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used by our Tutors to draft this document, however the contents are provided “as is” without any representations or warranties, express or implied.
This document is to be used for comparison, research, and reference purposes ONLY. No part of this document may be reproduced, resold, or transmitted in any form or by
any means without prior written permission from the Author. By making use of this document, you agree to fully accept the consequences should you plagiarise or misuse
this document. – STUDY BUDDY TUTOR SA
PAST PAPERS & MEMOS, ASSIGNMENT MEMOS, NOTES, SUMMARIES & TUITONS.
Cell: 074 074 3729 Email:
Question
The Jaga v Dönges 1950 (4) SA 653 (A), which was delivered at the height of apartheid, remains important for the interpretation
of statutes after the democratic transformation. Kindly read the case and answer the following questions.
(a) BRIEFLY PROVIDE facts of the Jaga case. (6)
(b) NAME AND DISCUSS the dominant interpretive approach before 1994 as followed by the majority in Jaga; (14)
(c) NAME and DISCUSS the alternative interpretive approach as followed by the minority in Jaga; (15)
(d) DISCUSS the effect of Section 39(2) of the Constitution and the new interpretive approach followed in Bato Star Fishing
(Pty) Ltd v Minister of Environmental Affairs 2004 (4) SA 490 (CC); (15)
DISTINCTION Footnotes and/or Bibliography
GUARANTEED!!! included. *
Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used by our Tutors to draft this document, however the contents are provided “as is” without any representations or warranties, express or implied.
This document is to be used for comparison, research, and reference purposes ONLY. No part of this document may be reproduced, resold, or transmitted in any form or by
any means without prior written permission from the Author. By making use of this document, you agree to fully accept the consequences should you plagiarise or misuse
this document. – STUDY BUDDY TUTOR SA
PAST PAPERS & MEMOS, ASSIGNMENT MEMOS, NOTES, SUMMARIES & TUITONS.
Cell: 074 074 3729 Email:
