PYC4808 Assignment 3 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) 2025-DUE 17 September 2025; 100% trusted ,comprehensive and complete reliable solution with clear explanation.

PYC4808 Assignment 3 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) 2025-DUE 17 September 2025; 100% trusted ,comprehensive and complete reliable solution with clear explanation. PYC4808 - Assessment 3 Alternative Exam Due Date: 17 September 2025 09h00 (No extensions can be granted for an exam) --- Instructions Read the case study below, and answer the questions that follow. Answer all questions. Requirements: This is an individual exam. Please remember that work submitted by students has to be their own work and students are not allowed to be assisted by somebody else or to assist fellow students in formulating their responses. A passive digital footprint is a data trail you unintentionally leave online. For every one of your online actions—positive or negative, deliberate or unintentional—there is a permanent record. This serves as notification that similar to any other examination, any activity during an online examination can be considered by the University to determine if any of the rules have been contravened. By writing this exam paper, you acknowledge the above, and consent for the University to review all online and social media platforms in the event that there is a suspicion of cheating. By writing this exam paper, you agree and declare that this is your own work, and that you have not copied answers from elsewhere, or been assisted in any way in the exam. You will only have ONE opportunity to submit your responses, so make sure that you submit the correct document. Include a plagiarism declaration in your assignment (refer to additional resources). Also include a cover page, table of contents, and reference list. Remember, NO EXTENTION CAN BE GRANTED. Technical requirements: Use Times New Roman (size 12) or Arial or Calibri (size 11). Remember to include in text references and a reference list. Referencing should be done according to APA 7th edition guidelines. Plagiarism will not be tolerated, and can lead to disciplinary action. Your assignment will be put through Turnitin. Remember, you will only have ONE opportunity to submit your document, so you will not be able to correct any answers once you have submitted. If plagiarism is detected, you will receive a mark of 0 for your assignment. If your assignment is not referenced at all, you will also receive a mark of 0 and your answers will not be marked. Referencing that is only partially done will be penalised. Under NO circumstances can AI be used to generate your answers. You as the student need to demonstrate your ability to apply your knowledge to the given case. --- Case Study: The Jackson Family Background The Jackson family consists of three generations: the grandparents (George (71) and Evelyn Jackson (65)), their son (David Jackson, 45), his wife (Laura Jackson, 41), and their two children—Jake (17) and Lily (13). Laura’s father, Peter, is 70 and lives in a retirement village. Her mother passed a year ago, at age 68. The family lives in a suburban area in Pinetown. Jake was referred to psychotherapy by his school counsellor due to signs of depression, declining academic performance, and increasing social withdrawal over the past six months. Jake, currently in matric (grade 12), had previously been a high-achieving student and athlete. However, over the past 6 months, his grades have dropped significantly, he has quit the cricket team, and has become increasingly isolated. He spends most of his time in his room, gaming or sleeping, and has little interaction with family or peers. Jake has also expressed feelings of hopelessness and meaninglessness. He denies suicidal ideation but reports chronic fatigue and difficulty concentrating. His parents, David and Laura, brought him to a family therapist at the urging of the school, although David initially expressed scepticism about psychotherapy. Family History George Jackson (71) is a retired military officer, emotionally reserved, highly disciplined, and authoritative. George had little involvement in raising his children emotionally but emphasised obedience, order, and achievement. Evelyn Jackson (65) was always a stay-at-home wife and mother, more emotionally expressive than George but often deferential to his authority. She took on the emotional caretaking of the children but struggled with anxiety and chronic health issues. George tended to make the rules in the family, with little resistance from Evelyn. David Jackson (45) is an only child, and is a mechanical engineer, pragmatic and focused on problem-solving, often emotionally distant. He grew up striving to meet his father's standards and rarely received praise or emotional validation. David has a perfectionistic streak and struggles with expressing emotions. Laura Jackson (41) is a schoolteacher. She is warm and nurturing but tends to over-function in the family, often absorbing the emotional needs of her children and spouse. Laura comes from a family with a history of enmeshment and covert emotional loyalty. She is often the mediator in family conflicts and takes on the role of peacekeeper. Jake Jackson (17) is described as highly sensitive and introspective, with a history of perfectionism and high achievement. He was labelled as the “family’s golden child” until recently. Lily Jackson (13) is outgoing, socially active, and does well in school. She appears well-adjusted but often makes dismissive comments about Jake’s “moodiness” and seems to have adapted to being the “easy child.” Family History & Dynamics David grew up in a home where emotional expression was discouraged, particularly by his father George. As a result, David learned to suppress his feelings and channelled his energies into academic and career success. His relationship with George remains emotionally distant; George often criticises David for being “too soft” with his own children. Evelyn, though more emotionally available, was often consumed with her own anxiety and health issues and relied heavily on David for emotional support. Laura, in contrast, came from a family where emotions were frequently discussed, albeit with blurred boundaries. Her mother often leaned on Laura for emotional support during her parents' tumultuous marriage. As a result, Laura developed an over-functioning style, attempting to care for everyone’s emotional needs, often at the cost of her own well-being. When David and Laura married, their contrasting emotional styles created tension. David often withdraws during conflict, while Laura pursues closeness and resolution. This dynamic plays out in their parenting: David holds high expectations but struggles to connect emotionally with his children, while Laura tries to compensate by being overly involved, particularly with Jake. Jake was an ideal child in the family system, was always high achieving, compliant, and emotionally sensitive. He internalised the family’s unspoken rules around performance and emotional suppression, especially from his father. As adolescence progressed, the pressure to maintain this idealised role, combined with a lack of space to express vulnerability, led to internal distress. Laura began leaning more heavily on Jake emotionally, especially when conflicts with David arose, further entangling Jake in a parentified role. Jake’s withdrawal began around the time of two significant events: 1. George moved into a nearby assisted living facility due to early signs of dementia. This caused emotional ripple effects across the family, especially for David, who began to emotionally retreat further under the weight of unprocessed grief and unresolved issues with his father. 2. Jake was rejected from a prestigious holiday internship programme at an accounting firm. Though not catastrophic, this failure seemed to shake Jake’s internalised belief that his worth was tied to performance. As Jake’s symptoms worsened, David responded by minimising the issue (“He’s just being dramatic”), while Laura intensified her involvement, constantly checking in on [Show less]