(COMPLETE ANSWERS)
Semester 2 2025 - DUE 15
September 2025
FOR FURTHER ASSISTANCE PLEASE
EMAIL ME AT
,QUESTION 1
Question 1
“Strategic control enables management to monitor strategic outcomes against its planned
strategic goals to ensure that all activities remain on track and correspond with the set
course.” Identify the type of strategic control evident in the Michelin company when they
changed from a pyramidal to a flat organisational structure. Substantiate your answer.
Identification of the Strategic Control
The type of strategic control evident in Michelin’s transformation from a pyramidal structure to a
flat organisational structure is structural control (also referred to as organisational control).
Substantiation
Michelin’s shift away from a traditional bureaucratic, pyramid-shaped hierarchy towards a
flatter, more collaborative organisational model is a textbook example of structural control.
Structural control focuses on how the design of the organisation, including reporting lines,
authority distribution, and decision-making processes, aligns with the organisation’s strategic
goals. It ensures that the structure of the business supports strategy implementation rather than
hindering it.
In Michelin’s case, the old pyramidal model reflected a top-down command-and-control
philosophy. Decision-making was centralised, managers were expected to have all the answers,
and employees were largely order-takers. While this system worked during the industrial era, it
proved to be highly inefficient in the modern digital age. Employees felt disengaged,
communication was slow, productivity declined, and safety issues became more frequent. Such a
rigid structure clashed with the strategic need for innovation, agility, and responsiveness in a
rapidly changing global market.
Recognising these challenges, Michelin introduced a flat organisational structure under CEO
Jean-Dominique Senard. This structural change represented not just a cosmetic adjustment, but a
deeper form of strategic control aimed at reshaping the organisational culture and supporting the
, company’s long-term competitiveness. In the flat model, employees were given greater
autonomy, accountability, and decision-making power. Shop-floor teams could schedule
production, divide responsibilities, set targets, and resolve absenteeism issues without waiting for
managerial approval. Managers transitioned from being supervisors to coaches and facilitators,
guiding teams rather than dictating every move.
This decentralisation of authority aligns with structural control because it directly adjusts the
framework of roles and responsibilities to ensure strategy execution. By empowering
employees and flattening reporting lines, Michelin ensured that strategic priorities—such as
efficiency, innovation, and employee engagement—were directly supported by its structure.
Why Structural Control Was Crucial for Michelin
1. Alignment with Strategy:
Michelin’s long-term strategic plan focused on growth, sustainability, and innovation.
The flat structure created room for employee creativity and collaboration, directly feeding
into these strategic goals.
2. Improved Communication:
In the old pyramid, communication often triggered disciplinary action, creating fear and
inefficiency. Structural control through flattening eliminated many layers of bureaucracy,
improving communication speed and accuracy.
3. Employee Empowerment and Motivation:
Workers could take ownership of their performance goals, boosting morale and
productivity. Strategic control here ensured that human resources were optimally aligned
with the strategic need for higher productivity and safety.
4. Cultural Transformation:
The change wasn’t just about structure—it signalled a cultural shift from authoritarian
management to one built on trust, collaboration, and accountability. Structural control
enabled this cultural realignment by embedding empowerment into the company’s formal
systems.
5. Performance Outcomes:
The results of this structural control were tangible: improved safety records, reduced
waste, better scheduling, and higher profitability (gross profit increased 38% between
2009 and 2021). This shows that the structural adjustments were effectively aligned with
Michelin’s strategic objectives.
Conclusion
The type of strategic control evident in Michelin’s transformation is structural control. This
form of control was implemented by moving from a rigid, bureaucratic pyramid to a flat, lean
organisational structure. By redesigning its structure, Michelin ensured that its strategic goals—
such as innovation, efficiency, employee engagement, and sustainability—could be effectively