RRLLB81 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2025 - DUE September 2025; 100% correct solutions and explanations.

RRLLB81 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2025 - DUE September 2025; 100% correct solutions and explanations. ALL TOPICS DONE. Below you will find the research topics from which you have to select one for your research report. The topics are arranged by Department in the School of Law. Most topics are supplemented with background information and references to preliminary sources based on the topics. The preliminary sources are the minimum sources necessary – you must supplement the sources indicated through independent research on the topic selected. NOTE: You are required to select one (1) topic from those listed and to base your both Assessment 2 and Assessment 3 for RRLLB81 on that same topic. You may not change topics once you have selected one. We are able to identify your specific assignment submissions and to verify that you keep to the same topic. The due dates and unique numbers for Assessment 2 and Assessment 3 will appear on the myUnisa module site for RRLLB81. Research topics: Department of Mercantile Law TOPIC ONE: Impeachable dispositions in Law of Insolvency Background An insolvent person can try to gather funds to relief some of the financial burden. This could include the selling of some of his assets to settle other debts. The amount that an asset is sold can determine whether the disposition of the asset can be set aside, as a disposition not made for value. For instance, if a friend or a relative of the insolvent person had acquired the assets from the insolvent person at a bargain price, and a contract is established between the two, should this agreement be challenged? The value the asset is disposed of can be a matter of dispute. Nevertheless, the contract can be considered to be valid between the insolvent and the relative. In insolvency law, the concept of “quid pro quo” matter when determining whether a disposition can be set aside. Is it therefore legally viable to set aside a disposition made on sale that can be considered to be a bargain. Conduct a research and provide your own understand of the legal rules involved. Cases Bloom’s Trustee v Fourie 1921 TPD 599 Hendriks N.O. v Swanepoel 1962 (4) SA 338 (A) Strydom N.O. v Snowball Wealth (Pty) 2022 (5) SA 438 (SCA) Books Sharrock J, Van der Linde K and Smith A, Hockly’s Insolvency Law (9th edn, Juta 2012) Bertelsmann E and others, Mars: Law of Insolvency in South Africa (10th edn, Juta 2019) Legislation Insolvency Act 24 of 1936 Journal Articles Mabe Z, ‘Setting aside Transactions from Pyramid Schemes as Impeachable Dispositions under South African Insolvency Legislation’ 2016(19) PER / PELJ 1 Marumoagae MC, ‘What amounts to “dispositions without value” in the context of section 26 of the Insolvency Act 24 of 1936?’ 2023 De Jure LJ 174 TOPIC TWO: Jurisprudential development and recognition of the concept of legitimate expectation in Labour matters Background The doctrine of legitimate expectation was authoritatively accepted as