100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

PVL3704 Assignment 1 Semester 2 |COMPLETE ANSWERS|- Due 21 August 2025

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
9
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
07-08-2025
Written in
2025/2026

PVL3704 Assignment 1 Semester 2 |COMPLETE ANSWERS|- Due 21 August 2025 100% COMPLETE










Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Document information

Uploaded on
August 7, 2025
Number of pages
9
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

PVL3704
Assignment 1

Semester 2
Due 21 August 2025

, ASSIGNMENT 01 SECOND SEMESTER 2025

DUE DATE: 21 AUGUST 2025

QUESTION 1 (15 marks)

Discuss in general (without reference to a specific enrichment action) how the
extent of enrichment liability (or the quantum of the enrichment claim) will be
calculated.

The extent of enrichment liability, also referred to as the quantum of an enrichment
claim, is central to the law of unjustified enrichment in South African private law. It refers
to the amount for which the enriched party can be held liable in restitution to the
impoverished party. Importantly, this quantum is not calculated based on the
impoverishment of the plaintiff alone, but rather on the actual retained enrichment of the
defendant at the time when the legal action is instituted. This approach is firmly based
on principles set out in Study Guide 1, which distinguishes between mere enrichment
and unjustified enrichment that is recoverable in law.

To determine the quantum of an enrichment claim, the following general principles
apply:

1. Initial Enrichment of the Defendant

The first step is to establish the initial value of the enrichment the defendant received.
This typically includes any money, property, or services that led to a measurable
increase in the defendant’s estate. The enrichment must be patrimonial, meaning it
must be capable of being economically evaluated and must have either saved the
defendant expenses or increased their assets. The law does not concern itself with
sentimental or moral benefits only with objective, financial gains.

For example, if a defendant received a car, the market value of that car at the time of
transfer would constitute the initial enrichment. If a defendant received services, such as
building work or legal advice, the value of those services in monetary terms forms the
initial enrichment.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
FocusZone University of South Africa (Unisa)
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
383
Member since
7 months
Number of followers
2
Documents
506
Last sold
1 month ago
Focus Zone

On this page you will find Uploads and Package Deals by the seller FOCUS ZONE.

4,3

57 reviews

5
33
4
11
3
11
2
0
1
2

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.

Pay how you prefer, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions