100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

PVL3701 Assignment 1 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2025 – DUE August 2025; 100% correct solutions and explanations.

Rating
-
Sold
3
Pages
13
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
04-08-2025
Written in
2025/2026

PVL3701 Assignment 1 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2025 – DUE August 2025; 100% correct solutions and explanations. Before you answer questions 1-3 of this assignment, read Study Units 1-4 and 6 very carefully. Also, read USS Graphics (Pty) Ltd and Others v Urban Print Factory (Pty) Ltd and Others (30921/2019) [2023] ZAGPJHC 138 (14 February 2023). While reading the Study Units and the USS Graphics (Pty) Ltd judgment, focus on the nature of the different rights that are dealt with in this module, namely personal rights, real rights and limited real rights (Study Unit 2). Keep in mind that ownership is the most complete real right that a person can have regarding his or her own thing, but the law and the rights of others can limit this right (Study Unit 3). Real rights such as ownership and limited real rights like servitudes, should be registered in the Deeds Registry, while personal rights are usually not registered. Ownership can be acquired in different ways, either through original means or through derivative means (Study Units 4 and 5). Certain remedies exist to protect the rights and interests of persons (Study Unit 6). Against this background, consider the following set of facts: Evergreen Printing, a company owned by Mr Mboweni, is the owner of a lithographic printing machine and a compressor that weighs 150 tons. USS Graphics, a company owned by Mr Viljoen, entered into a two-year agreement with Evergreen Printing to lease the printing machine and compressor at his home. Mr Mboweni has a long-standing relationship with Mr Viljoen as both are involved in the printing industry. USS Graphics’ business is operating in Mr Viljoen’s house’s garage (an immovable thing) with consent from the local authority. To operate optimally, the printing machine and compressor were attached to the floor and walls. After two years, the lease agreement was not renewed. Because Mr Viljoen’s company was extremely profitable, USS Graphics, decided to continue using the printing machine and compressor even after the expiry of the agreement. Mr Mboweni was not happy about this situation. His company (Evergreen Printing) was losing revenue because USS Graphics was using the printing machine and the compressor without paying rent. Evergreen printing therefore wanted to reclaim them. However, Mr Viljoen refuses to return them and argues that they belong to his company. Against this background, answer questions 1-3: Question 1 Would Mr Mboweni’s Evergreen Printing Company be able to vindicate the printing machine and compressor from Mr Viljoen’s garage, and what must it prove to succeed in court? In your answer, refer to the Study Guide and the

Show more Read less









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Document information

Uploaded on
August 4, 2025
Number of pages
13
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

, PVL3701 Assignment 1 (COMPLETE ANSWERS)
Semester 2 2025 – DUE August 2025; 100% correct
solutions and explanations.
Question 1
Yes, Evergreen Printing Company (owned by Mr Mboweni) would
be able to vindicate (reclaim) the printing machine and compressor
from Mr Viljoen’s garage provided that it can meet the
requirements for the rei vindicatio remedy.


1. Correct Legal Remedy: Rei Vindicatio
The appropriate legal remedy available to Evergreen Printing is the
rei vindicatio, a real remedy used to recover possession of a
corporeal movable or immovable thing from someone who
possesses it unlawfully. It is a real action aimed at enforcing a real
right—specifically, the right of ownership.
According to Study Unit 6, the rei vindicatio may be instituted by
the owner against any person who is in possession of the owner's
property without consent or legal justification.
In the USS Graphics (Pty) Ltd and Others v Urban Print
Factory (Pty) Ltd and Others [2023] ZAGPJHC 138 case, the
Johannesburg High Court dealt precisely with a matter involving
movable property installed in an immovable structure and whether
the original owner could reclaim it through rei vindicatio. The court
ruled that the rightful owner was entitled to reclaim possession of
the property that had not acceded to the immovable property and
still retained its identity.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
MasterVincent University of South Africa (Unisa)
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
2561
Member since
2 year
Number of followers
452
Documents
1529
Last sold
1 week ago
MasterVincent

On this page, you find all documents, package deals, and flashcards offered by seller MasterVincent.

4,1

375 reviews

5
205
4
68
3
50
2
24
1
28

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.

Pay how you prefer, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions