100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

CIC2601 Assignment 3 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) 2025 - DUE 6 August 2025

Rating
4,3
(3)
Sold
19
Pages
13
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
19-07-2025
Written in
2024/2025

CIC2601 Assignment 3 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) 2025 - DUE 6 August 2025; 100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and explanations. For assistance, Whats-App 0.6.7-1.7.1-1.7.3.9. Ensure your success with us.. Question Question 1 [20 marks] The aim of this question is to allow you to demonstrate how digital technologies can be used to foster higher-order cognitive skills. Task: How can you ensure that the use of digital technologies in the classroom supports the development of critical thinking and problem-solving skills in learners? Criteria Excellent (5) Good (4) Satisfactory (3) Needs Improvement (2) Poor (1) Integration of Digital Technologies Clearly describes how digital technologies are used to foster higher-order cognitive skills. Describes the use of digital technologies with minor details missing. Mentions the use of digital technologies but lacks clarity on fostering cognitive skills. Vague mention of digital technologies with little relevance to cognitive skills. No mention of digital technologies or irrelevant use. Development of Critical Thinking Provides a detailed explanation of how digital technologies support critical thinking. Explains support for critical thinking with some details missing. Basic explanation of support for critical thinking. Vague explanation of support for critical thinking. No explanation of support for critical thinking. Development of Problem-Solving Skills Thoroughly explains how digital technologies enhance problem-solving skills. Explains enhancement of problem-solving skills with some details missing. Basic explanation of enhancement of problem-solving skills. Vague explanation of enhancement of problem-solving skills. No explanation of enhancement of problem-solving skills. Academic Integrity The submission is presented in clear, concise, and formal language. No spelling and grammar mistakes. Evidence of all claims made in the submission is provided in the text and there is a reference list at the end of the submission. All sources are scholarly and relate to the topic. The submission is presented in clear, concise, and formal language. Minimal spelling and grammar mistakes. Evidence of most claims made in the submission is provided in the text and there is a reference list at the end of the submission. Sources are primarily scholarly and relate to the topic. The submission is presented in clear and concise language. Use of formal language is intermittent. Noticeable spelling and grammar mistakes. Evidence of some claims made in the submission is provided in the text and there is a reference list at the end of the submission. Sources are not primarily scholarly and relate to the topic but somewhat tangentially. Language use is poor; lack of use of formal language; excessive spelling and/or grammar mistakes. Little, if any, citation of sources. Citation style is either inconsistent or incorrect. Sources are disproportionately non-scholarly, and most do not relate to the topic. Language use is poor with many mistakes. Sources are not provided both in the text and in the reference list. ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** Question 2 [20 marks] In this question, we encourage you to critically evaluate digital technology tools and their relevance in teaching. Task: Select a digital tool that you have learned about in this module. Evaluate its effectiveness in the classroom, considering its strengths and limitations. How would you recommend improving it for educational use? Criteria Excellent (5) Good (4) Satisfactory (3) Needs Improvement (2) Poor (1) Evaluation of Digital Tool Clearly evaluates the digital tool, considering its strengths and limitations. Evaluates the digital tool with some details missing. Basic evaluation of the digital tool. Vague evaluation of the digital tool. No evaluation of the digital tool. Strengths and Limitations Provides detailed and relevant strengths and limitations of the digital tool. Provides strengths and limitations with some details missing. Basic strengths and limitations provided. Vague strengths and limitations. No strengths and limitations provided. Recommendations for Improvement Thoroughly explains recommendations for improving the digital tool for educational use. Explains recommendations with some details missing. Basic recommendations provided. Vague recommendations. No recommendations provided. Academic Integrity The submission is presented in clear, concise, and formal language. No spelling and grammar mistakes. Evidence of all claims made in the submission is provided in the text and there is a reference list at the end of the submission. All sources are scholarly and relate to the topic. The submission is presented in clear, concise, and formal language. Minimal spelling and grammar mistakes. Evidence of most claims made in the submission is provided in the text and there is a reference list at the end of the submission. Sources are primarily scholarly and relate to the topic. The submission is presented in clear and concise language. Use of formal language is intermittent. Noticeable spelling and grammar mistakes. Evidence of some claims made in the submission is provided in the text and there is a reference list at the end of the submission. Sources are not primarily scholarly and relate to the topic but somewhat tangentially. Language use is poor; lack of use of formal language; excessive spelling and/or grammar mistakes. Little, if any, citation of sources. Citation style is either inconsistent or incorrect. Sources are disproportionately non-scholarly, and most do not relate to the topic. Language use is poor with many mistakes. Sources are not provided both in the text and in the reference list. ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** Question 3 [10 marks] This question promotes critical thinking about potential barriers and solutions, whether they are technological, pedagogical, or institutional. Task: What are the key challenges you foresee in integrating digital technologies into classroom instruction, and how might you address them? Criteria Excellent (5) Good (4) Satisfactory (3) Needs Improvement (2) Poor (1) Identification of Challenges Clearly identifies key challenges in integrating digital technologies. Identifies challenges with some details missing. Basic identification of challenges. Vague identification of challenges. No identification of challenges. Solutions to Challenges Provides detailed and practical solutions to address the challenges. Provides solutions with some details missing. Basic solutions provided. Vague solutions. No solutions provided. CIC2601-25-Y

Show more Read less








Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Document information

Uploaded on
July 19, 2025
Number of pages
13
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

CIC2601
Assignment 3 2025
Unique number:

Due Date: 6 August 2025
QUESTION 1

Using Digital Technologies to Foster Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving Skills in
the Classroom

1. Introduction

The 21st-century classroom is defined by the integration of digital technologies that enhance
learning. However, simply using technology is not enough. Teachers must ensure that these
tools promote deeper understanding, critical engagement, and problem-solving ability.
According to Gunter and Gunter (2015), effective use of digital tools can support learner-
centered strategies that enhance higher-order cognitive skills such as analysis, evaluation,
and creation. This essay explores how digital technologies can be implemented meaningfully
to develop critical thinking and problem-solving skills in learners.



2. Strategies to Support Critical Thinking Through Technology

2.1. Inquiry-Based Learning with Internet Tools Terms of use
By making use of this document you agree to:
 Use this document as a guide for learning, comparison and reference purpose,
Terms of use
 Not to duplicate, reproduce and/or misrepresent the contents of this document as your own work,
By making use of this document you agree to:
 Use this document
Fully accept the consequences
solely as a guide forshould you plagiarise
learning, reference,or and
misuse this document.
comparison purposes,
 Ensure originality of your own work, and fully accept the consequences should you plagiarise or misuse this document.
 Comply with all relevant standards, guidelines, regulations, and legislation governing academic and written work.

Disclaimer
Great care has been taken in the preparation of this document; however, the contents are provided "as is" without any express or
implied representations or warranties. The author accepts no responsibility or liability for any actions taken based on the
information contained within this document. This document is intended solely for comparison, research, and reference purposes.
Reproduction, resale, or transmission of any part of this document, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited.
R50,00
Get access to the full document:
Purchased by 19 students

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Reviews from verified buyers

Showing all 3 reviews
4 months ago

4 months ago

4 months ago

4,3

3 reviews

5
2
4
0
3
1
2
0
1
0
Trustworthy reviews on Stuvia

All reviews are made by real Stuvia users after verified purchases.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
EduPal University of South Africa (Unisa)
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
149166
Member since
7 year
Number of followers
35995
Documents
4326
Last sold
20 hours ago

4,2

13558 reviews

5
7805
4
2688
3
1791
2
455
1
819

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.

Pay how you prefer, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions