RESEARCH ↑ URPOSE or RESEARCH
EXPLORE ,
PREDICT ,
EXPLAIN , DESCRIBE PHENOMENA
-
CONTRIBUTE 2 BODY OF KNOWLEDGE
WHAT IS RESEARCH
TYPES oF KNOWLEDGE
SYSTEMATIC INQUIRY 2 GENERATE NEW KNOWLEDGE ON SOLVE PROB
INVOLVES SCIENTIFIC METHODS :
POPULAR -BASED ON COMMON SENSE
·
OBSERVATION SCIENTIFIC-BASED ON EMPIRICAL + SYSTEMATIC METHODS
·
DATA COLLECTION
·
ANALYSIS
·
INTERPRETATION
ETHICAL
QUALITIES OF A
RESEARCH PROCESS
2 GOOD RESEARCHER
REVIEW LITERATURE
I
3
CURIOUS OBJECTIVE
7
IDENTIFY RESEARCH
FORMULATE R . QS /OBJ .
CRITICAL THINKER
PROBLEM
4
M V
DESIGN
METHODOLOGY
SYSTEMATIC
ONLY USED IN QUANTITATIVE
INTERPRET AND # RESEARCH
REPORT FINDINGS
>
7
CORET
HYPOTHESIS
5
ANALYSE
DATA
6 TENTATIVE EXPLANATION OR PREDICTION
-
NULL HYPOTHESIS (HO) : NO RELATIONSHIP
ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESIS (H1) : ASSUMES RELATIONSHIP EXISTS
RESEARCHPROBLEM
-
RESEARCH OBJECTIVES O INVESTIGAT
TESTABLE
STATEM OF WHAT THE RESEARCH
OF A
AIMS 2 ACHIEVE
CHARAC
.
RESEARCHQUEST
.
USE "TO" + VERB FORMAT
STO EXPLORE ,
TO ASSESS) GOOD HYPOTHESIS
) NOT YES on NO)
MEASURABLE
BASED ON THEORY
VARIABLES
OR LITERATURE
HISTORICAL
sinoconino
(ITERATURE TYPES
THEMATIC
ROLES PROCESS
THEORETICAL
REVIEW
THE EMPIRICAL
SHOW UNDERST .
OF EXISTING RESEARCH
1) READ LITERATURE PURPOSE : IDENTIFY CAPS
THEMES SUPPORT RATIONALE
2) ORGANISE
AVOID DUPLICATION
3) LINK CONCEPTS
4) EVALUATE CRITICALLY CONFIRMABILITY
METHODOLOGY NEUTRALITY (REFLEXIVITY (
5) SYNTHESIZE IDEAS
THEORY
7
DATE OF
PUBLICATION
- TRANSFERABITA TEXTs
EVALUATING CREDIBILITY
QUALITATIVE
7
TRUTHFULNESS
LITERATURE EG : TRIANGULATION
a
TECHNIQUE
RESEARCH
CREDIBILITY > DEPENDABILITY
RELEVANCE USES WORDS ,
IMAGES CONSISTENCY CAUDIT TRAIL
· INDUCTIVE LOGIC
· SMALL SAMPLES ,
SUBJECTIVE ,
DEEP UNDERSTANDING
DESIGNS
RESEARCH RATIONALE IDENTIEY T
DESCRIBE
SIGNIFICANCE ·
PHENOMENOLOGY
THE STUDY MATTERS PROBLEM (LIVED EXPERIENCES)
- EXPLAINS WHY PRESENT PROPOSED
+ GAP IT ADDRESSES SHOW POTENTIAL
-
METHOD ·
ETHNOGRAPHY
CONTRIB .
↑
1 CULTURAL GROUP STUDY 1
GOOD RATIONALE ·
GROUNDED THEORY
KEY As I ANSWER (DEVELOPS FROM GROUND UP)
·
CASE STUDY
·
WHY IS THIS TOPIC WORTH STUDYING ? (SINGLE CASE)
-
WHAT GAP DOES IT FILL ?
-
HOW IS THE STUDY DESIGNED 2 AND THE ISSUE
.
? ·
ACTION RESEARCH
(SOLVE PRACTICAL/REAL WORLD PROBLEMS
- OFTEN IN CYCLES
EXPLORE ,
PREDICT ,
EXPLAIN , DESCRIBE PHENOMENA
-
CONTRIBUTE 2 BODY OF KNOWLEDGE
WHAT IS RESEARCH
TYPES oF KNOWLEDGE
SYSTEMATIC INQUIRY 2 GENERATE NEW KNOWLEDGE ON SOLVE PROB
INVOLVES SCIENTIFIC METHODS :
POPULAR -BASED ON COMMON SENSE
·
OBSERVATION SCIENTIFIC-BASED ON EMPIRICAL + SYSTEMATIC METHODS
·
DATA COLLECTION
·
ANALYSIS
·
INTERPRETATION
ETHICAL
QUALITIES OF A
RESEARCH PROCESS
2 GOOD RESEARCHER
REVIEW LITERATURE
I
3
CURIOUS OBJECTIVE
7
IDENTIFY RESEARCH
FORMULATE R . QS /OBJ .
CRITICAL THINKER
PROBLEM
4
M V
DESIGN
METHODOLOGY
SYSTEMATIC
ONLY USED IN QUANTITATIVE
INTERPRET AND # RESEARCH
REPORT FINDINGS
>
7
CORET
HYPOTHESIS
5
ANALYSE
DATA
6 TENTATIVE EXPLANATION OR PREDICTION
-
NULL HYPOTHESIS (HO) : NO RELATIONSHIP
ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESIS (H1) : ASSUMES RELATIONSHIP EXISTS
RESEARCHPROBLEM
-
RESEARCH OBJECTIVES O INVESTIGAT
TESTABLE
STATEM OF WHAT THE RESEARCH
OF A
AIMS 2 ACHIEVE
CHARAC
.
RESEARCHQUEST
.
USE "TO" + VERB FORMAT
STO EXPLORE ,
TO ASSESS) GOOD HYPOTHESIS
) NOT YES on NO)
MEASURABLE
BASED ON THEORY
VARIABLES
OR LITERATURE
HISTORICAL
sinoconino
(ITERATURE TYPES
THEMATIC
ROLES PROCESS
THEORETICAL
REVIEW
THE EMPIRICAL
SHOW UNDERST .
OF EXISTING RESEARCH
1) READ LITERATURE PURPOSE : IDENTIFY CAPS
THEMES SUPPORT RATIONALE
2) ORGANISE
AVOID DUPLICATION
3) LINK CONCEPTS
4) EVALUATE CRITICALLY CONFIRMABILITY
METHODOLOGY NEUTRALITY (REFLEXIVITY (
5) SYNTHESIZE IDEAS
THEORY
7
DATE OF
PUBLICATION
- TRANSFERABITA TEXTs
EVALUATING CREDIBILITY
QUALITATIVE
7
TRUTHFULNESS
LITERATURE EG : TRIANGULATION
a
TECHNIQUE
RESEARCH
CREDIBILITY > DEPENDABILITY
RELEVANCE USES WORDS ,
IMAGES CONSISTENCY CAUDIT TRAIL
· INDUCTIVE LOGIC
· SMALL SAMPLES ,
SUBJECTIVE ,
DEEP UNDERSTANDING
DESIGNS
RESEARCH RATIONALE IDENTIEY T
DESCRIBE
SIGNIFICANCE ·
PHENOMENOLOGY
THE STUDY MATTERS PROBLEM (LIVED EXPERIENCES)
- EXPLAINS WHY PRESENT PROPOSED
+ GAP IT ADDRESSES SHOW POTENTIAL
-
METHOD ·
ETHNOGRAPHY
CONTRIB .
↑
1 CULTURAL GROUP STUDY 1
GOOD RATIONALE ·
GROUNDED THEORY
KEY As I ANSWER (DEVELOPS FROM GROUND UP)
·
CASE STUDY
·
WHY IS THIS TOPIC WORTH STUDYING ? (SINGLE CASE)
-
WHAT GAP DOES IT FILL ?
-
HOW IS THE STUDY DESIGNED 2 AND THE ISSUE
.
? ·
ACTION RESEARCH
(SOLVE PRACTICAL/REAL WORLD PROBLEMS
- OFTEN IN CYCLES
