Assignment 2
(EXCEPTIONAL ANSWERS)
Due 2025
,HED4806
Assignment 2
Due 2025
SECTION A: COMPARATIVE EDUCATION AND EDUCATION FOR SELF-RELIANCE
IN TANZANIA
Question 1(a): Comparative Education (Chapter 8)
1. Define “Comparative and International Education.”
Comparative and International Education (CIE) constitutes an interdisciplinary field
dedicated to systematically analyzing, contrasting, and understanding educational
systems, policies, and practices across diverse cultural, social, and political contexts
(Crossley & Watson, 2003). While comparative education emphasizes intra- and inter-
national analysis of educational structures, curricula, and outcomes—aiming to discern
patterns, efficacies, and cultural influences—international education broadens this
scope to include transnational trends, global policy influences, and cross-border
collaborations, often within the framework of globalization (Mundy & Verger, 2019). As
Smith (2012) emphasizes, CIE seeks not only to identify differences and similarities but
also to critically interrogate the power dynamics, epistemologies, and cultural biases
embedded within education systems, especially in post-colonial contexts. In this regard,
CIE becomes an essential tool for fostering “cognitive justice” (Smith, 2012:214),
advocating for indigenous epistemologies and decolonial approaches that challenge the
dominance of Western paradigms.
, 2. Discuss any four phases in the historical evolution of the field of Comparative
and International Education.
The evolution of CIE reflects its transition from a descriptive, colonial project to a
reflexive, critical discipline attentive to global diversity and power relations. The four key
phases are:
• Early Phase (19th Century – Pre-1900): Rooted in European enlightenment
and colonial expansion, this phase was characterized by descriptive studies,
often Eurocentric, focusing on cataloging educational systems to inform national
reforms. Pioneers like Marc-Antoine Jullien prioritized cataloging Western
models, which reinforced colonial superiority narratives (Seroto et al., 2020). This
phase lacked reflexivity, often marginalizing non-Western epistemologies,
aligning with Blaut’s (1993) critique of Eurocentric historiography.
• Post-War Expansion (1945–1980): Following WWII and decolonization, CIE
expanded as UNESCO and other agencies promoted international cooperation
for development. The focus shifted toward addressing inequality, access, and the
role of education in nation-building, exemplified by Tanzania’s ESR. However,
research remained predominantly conducted by Western scholars, perpetuating
epistemic dominance (Wolhuter, 2008).
• Globalization and Critical Phase (1980–Present): The advent of neoliberalism
and globalization fostered new analytical lenses—standardized testing, global
rankings, and market-oriented reforms. Simultaneously, postcolonial and
decolonial critiques emerged, challenging Western hegemony and advocating for
indigenous epistemologies (Smith, 2012). Researchers like Linda Tuhiwai Smith
(2012) have emphasized indigenous methodologies, promoting “epistemic
justice” within CIE.
• Contemporary Reflexivity and Decolonial Turn: The current phase
emphasizes critical engagement with power, knowledge, and representation.
Scholars interrogate the coloniality of knowledge, seeking to decolonize curricula
and research practices (Maldonado-Torres, 2007). This phase recognizes the