HED4809
assignmen
Assignment 2 2025
UNIQUE CODE:
Detailed Solutions, References & Explanations
DUE DATE: June 2025
Terms of use
By making use of this document you agree to:
Use this document as a guide for learning,
comparison and reference purpose,
Not to duplicate, reproduce and/or misrepresent the
contents of this document as your own work,
Fully accept the consequences should you plagiarise
or misuse this document.
Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used to create this
document, however the contents are provided “as
is” without any representations or warranties,
express or implied. The author assumes no
liability as a result of reliance and use of the
contents of this document. This document is to
be used for comparison, research and reference
purposes ONLY. No part of this document may be
reproduced, resold or transmitted in any form or
by any means.
, 0688120934
PREVIEW
Analysing Sociological Perspectives on Education and Society: Conflict Theory,
Functionalism, and Marxist Theory
1. Introduction
Sociological theories provide essential frameworks for understanding how societies
function and how institutions like education reinforce or challenge prevailing social
norms and inequalities. Among the most prominent theories are Functionalism, Conflict
Theory, and Marxist Theory. Each of these perspectives offers distinct insights into the
role of education in shaping social structures, transmitting values, and either reinforcing
or challenging socio-economic hierarchies.
Functionalism views society as a system of interrelated parts working together to
maintain stability and social order (Durkheim, 1912/2001). In contrast, Conflict Theory,
derived from Marxist thought, sees society as composed of groups competing for limited
resources, with institutions like education reflecting and reinforcing power imbalances
(Collins, 1971). Marxist Theory specifically centres on economic relationships and class
struggles, portraying education as a tool for perpetuating capitalist ideologies and
maintaining the dominance of the ruling class (Bowles & Gintis, 1976).
Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used to create this document, however the contents are provided “as is”
without any representations or warranties, express or implied. The author assumes no liability as
a result of reliance and use of the contents of this document. This document is to be used for
comparison, research and reference purposes ONLY. No part of this document may be
reproduced, resold or transmitted in any form or by any means.
assignmen
Assignment 2 2025
UNIQUE CODE:
Detailed Solutions, References & Explanations
DUE DATE: June 2025
Terms of use
By making use of this document you agree to:
Use this document as a guide for learning,
comparison and reference purpose,
Not to duplicate, reproduce and/or misrepresent the
contents of this document as your own work,
Fully accept the consequences should you plagiarise
or misuse this document.
Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used to create this
document, however the contents are provided “as
is” without any representations or warranties,
express or implied. The author assumes no
liability as a result of reliance and use of the
contents of this document. This document is to
be used for comparison, research and reference
purposes ONLY. No part of this document may be
reproduced, resold or transmitted in any form or
by any means.
, 0688120934
PREVIEW
Analysing Sociological Perspectives on Education and Society: Conflict Theory,
Functionalism, and Marxist Theory
1. Introduction
Sociological theories provide essential frameworks for understanding how societies
function and how institutions like education reinforce or challenge prevailing social
norms and inequalities. Among the most prominent theories are Functionalism, Conflict
Theory, and Marxist Theory. Each of these perspectives offers distinct insights into the
role of education in shaping social structures, transmitting values, and either reinforcing
or challenging socio-economic hierarchies.
Functionalism views society as a system of interrelated parts working together to
maintain stability and social order (Durkheim, 1912/2001). In contrast, Conflict Theory,
derived from Marxist thought, sees society as composed of groups competing for limited
resources, with institutions like education reflecting and reinforcing power imbalances
(Collins, 1971). Marxist Theory specifically centres on economic relationships and class
struggles, portraying education as a tool for perpetuating capitalist ideologies and
maintaining the dominance of the ruling class (Bowles & Gintis, 1976).
Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used to create this document, however the contents are provided “as is”
without any representations or warranties, express or implied. The author assumes no liability as
a result of reliance and use of the contents of this document. This document is to be used for
comparison, research and reference purposes ONLY. No part of this document may be
reproduced, resold or transmitted in any form or by any means.
