,RCE2601 Assignment 2 Memo (COMPLETE ANSWERS) 2025 - DUE 13
June 2025;100% CORRECT AND TRUSTED SOLUTIONS
Case Study 1: Evaluating Sources for a Literature Review
Total: 100 Marks
SCENARIO
Sarah is a postgraduate student researching the impact of artificial intelligence (AI)
on higher education. During her initial literature search, she comes across a variety
of sources:
• A blog post written by a technology enthusiast
• A Wikipedia page
• A peer-reviewed journal article
• A government report
Sarah is unsure which sources suit her literature review and needs to make
informed decisions about credibility, relevance, and academic integrity.
Task 1: Source Evaluation (40 Marks)
1. Identify which sources Sarah should prioritise in her literature review and
justify your answer.
2. Consider each source's reliability, authorship, publication process, and
academic value in your response. Identify which sources are credible and
should be prioritised. Justify the exclusion or limited use of other sources.
Discuss how each source type can (or cannot) contribute to a literature review.
1. Identification and Prioritisation of Sources for the Literature Review
Sarah should prioritise the peer-reviewed journal article and the government
report in her literature review. These sources are the most credible, authoritative,
and academically appropriate for inclusion in a postgraduate-level literature
review. The blog post and Wikipedia page are not appropriate for direct citation
in academic writing due to concerns about credibility, authorship, and editorial
, oversight, although they may be used cautiously for background reading or as a
starting point to identify more reputable sources.
2. Evaluation of Each Source Based on Reliability, Authorship, Publication
Process, and Academic Value
Let us examine each source in detail:
A. Peer-Reviewed Journal Article
✅ Credibility: High
✅ Authorship: Usually written by scholars or experts in the field, with clear
affiliations and credentials.
✅ Publication Process: Undergoes rigorous peer-review by other experts before
publication, ensuring high academic standards, methodological soundness, and
relevance.
✅ Academic Value: Very high. Peer-reviewed articles are essential in any
literature review because they contribute original research, critical analysis, or
systematic reviews that advance the academic conversation.
📌 Conclusion:
Sarah must prioritise this source. It forms the foundation of a credible literature
review and provides academically rigorous insights and empirical evidence
relevant to the topic of AI in higher education.
B. Government Report
✅ Credibility: Generally high, especially if published by a reputable government
department (e.g., Department of Education or Ministry of Science and
Technology).
✅ Authorship: Authored by experts, policymakers, or commissioned researchers.
The authorship may be institutional rather than individual.
✅ Publication Process: Although not peer-reviewed, government reports are
typically subject to editorial review, fact-checking, and internal approval
June 2025;100% CORRECT AND TRUSTED SOLUTIONS
Case Study 1: Evaluating Sources for a Literature Review
Total: 100 Marks
SCENARIO
Sarah is a postgraduate student researching the impact of artificial intelligence (AI)
on higher education. During her initial literature search, she comes across a variety
of sources:
• A blog post written by a technology enthusiast
• A Wikipedia page
• A peer-reviewed journal article
• A government report
Sarah is unsure which sources suit her literature review and needs to make
informed decisions about credibility, relevance, and academic integrity.
Task 1: Source Evaluation (40 Marks)
1. Identify which sources Sarah should prioritise in her literature review and
justify your answer.
2. Consider each source's reliability, authorship, publication process, and
academic value in your response. Identify which sources are credible and
should be prioritised. Justify the exclusion or limited use of other sources.
Discuss how each source type can (or cannot) contribute to a literature review.
1. Identification and Prioritisation of Sources for the Literature Review
Sarah should prioritise the peer-reviewed journal article and the government
report in her literature review. These sources are the most credible, authoritative,
and academically appropriate for inclusion in a postgraduate-level literature
review. The blog post and Wikipedia page are not appropriate for direct citation
in academic writing due to concerns about credibility, authorship, and editorial
, oversight, although they may be used cautiously for background reading or as a
starting point to identify more reputable sources.
2. Evaluation of Each Source Based on Reliability, Authorship, Publication
Process, and Academic Value
Let us examine each source in detail:
A. Peer-Reviewed Journal Article
✅ Credibility: High
✅ Authorship: Usually written by scholars or experts in the field, with clear
affiliations and credentials.
✅ Publication Process: Undergoes rigorous peer-review by other experts before
publication, ensuring high academic standards, methodological soundness, and
relevance.
✅ Academic Value: Very high. Peer-reviewed articles are essential in any
literature review because they contribute original research, critical analysis, or
systematic reviews that advance the academic conversation.
📌 Conclusion:
Sarah must prioritise this source. It forms the foundation of a credible literature
review and provides academically rigorous insights and empirical evidence
relevant to the topic of AI in higher education.
B. Government Report
✅ Credibility: Generally high, especially if published by a reputable government
department (e.g., Department of Education or Ministry of Science and
Technology).
✅ Authorship: Authored by experts, policymakers, or commissioned researchers.
The authorship may be institutional rather than individual.
✅ Publication Process: Although not peer-reviewed, government reports are
typically subject to editorial review, fact-checking, and internal approval
