Please also note that the author of this document will not be responsible for any plagiarism you
commit.
SECTION A: HISTORY OF EDUCATION
Question 1
Section A is based on the given extract from chapter 2 of the prescribed textbook (Seroto, Davids &
Wolhuter 2020). Read the extract and then answer the questions that follow.
Geographical focus of research and of authorship
Scholars, analysts, progressive scholars and academics in all education sciences and beyond, have
expressed concern that the corpus of scholarly publications is dominated by researchers in the global
world and that their focus is lopsided in favour of the Global North or themes favoured by the interests
of the Global North. In a content analysis of articles published in the first 50 years of the top journal in
the field of Comparative and International Education, the Comparative Education Review, Wolhuter
(2008:330-331) found that countries of the Global North dominate the geographical focus of research.
In addition, where countries of the Global South are the subject of research, it is dominated by
researchers from the Global North (cf Wolhuter, 2018). Of the 18 523 articles published in the total
pool of Thomson-Reuters indexed education journals for the year 2012, a mere 2.13% were authored
by scholars in Africa (ibid).
Depaepe and Simon (1996) do not include the geographical terrain of articles in their research but do
provide an interesting analysis of author provenance. For the articles published during 1961 to 1989 in
Paedagogica Historica, the rank-order of national provenance of authors is illustrated in table 2.2. The
pattern for the period 1990 to 1995 does not differ much. However, in this period, the Global South
fares worse with 1.6% of all authors (South Africa: 0.8% and Zaire: 0.8%) as shown in table 2.3.
Table 2.2 National provenance of authors published in rank order, 1961 to 1989
National provenance of authors (Global North) 1961 to 1989 1. Germany: 22.7%; 2. US: 21.5%; 3.
UK: 10.6%; 4. France: 7.4%; 5. Belgium: 6.5% National provenance of authors (Global South) 1961
to 1989 1. India: 1.2%; 2. Malaysia: 1.2%; 3. Nigeria: 0.6%; 4. Sri Lanka: 0.6%; 5. Argentina: 0.3%;
6. Oman: 0.3%; 7. Pakistan: 0.3%; 8. South Africa: 0.3%; 9. Thailand: 0.3%; 10. Zimbabwe: 0.3%
(Source: Depaepe & Simon, 1996:426)
Table 2.3 National provenance of authors published in rank order, 1990 to 1995
National provenance of authors (Global North) 1990 to 1995 1. Netherlands: 20.2%; 2. Germany:
17.8%; 3. Belgium: 14.0%; 4 France: 10.1%; 5. US: 7.0% National provenance of authors (Global
South) 1990 to 1995 1. Only 1.6% of all authors in the Global South; 2. South Africa: 0.8%; 3. Former
Zaire: 0.8%
(Source: Depaepe & Simon, 1996)
Freeman and Kirke (2017) deal with geographical foci in their analysis, although the limitation of their
study is that it covers English medium journals only. Freeman and Kirke (2017:830) found that in
geographical coverage, throughout the period 1952 to 2016, England and Great Britain dominated as
geographical terrain of study. During the decade 1980 to 1989, 43.9% of all published articles dealt
with England and Great Britain; in 2016, 25.7% of all published articles focused on England and Great
, Britain. While colonialism and colonial education policy remain an area of interest in the field, as do
race and ethnicity, two provisos should be mentioned. On the second (race and ethnicity), research has
been spurred by events in the Global North and is dominated by the Global North as terrain. These
events include the 1960 Civil Rights Movement in the United States of America, the school
desegregation movement in the same country, right up to the #BlackLivesMatter movement in the
USA and the immigration patterns and increasingly multicultural composition of the population of the
United Kingdom (UK). In 2016, 14 of the 19 articles in the "race and ethnicity" category identified by
Freeman and Kirke (2017:843), were about the US. On colonialism and colonial education, the proviso
can be tabled that the current imperative for the decolonialisation of education makes the attention
given to colonialism and the neglect of decolonialisation appear rather lopsided. While many
historians eschew recent history, where the "fog of proximity" makes the true significance of events
hard to see, and not entirely without merit, it could be said that the Global South has had a long run of
decolonialisation – sub-Saharan Africa over 60 years; in the case of Latin America, already more than
two centuries. Its history merits attention. This call has also been made and elaborated upon by Davids
(2013).
The need to recentre History of Education in the Global South Most states in the Global South have
been subjected to European imperialism in one form or another and dominated by "foreign" histories.
The need to retrieve new processes of producing and valorising legitimate epistemologies, whether
scientific or non-scientific, is imperative for the Global South. The validation of such knowledges will
only happen when historians of the Global South revisit spaces and practices that are characterised by
systemic oppression, discrimination, capitalism and colonialism. The Global South does not only refer
to geographical location; it also refers to the pain caused by capitalism and colonialism at different
levels. In the Global South, the majority of people were silenced, marginalised and unemployed and
were victims of sexism and racism because of colonialism. History of Education practitioners in the
Global South should not only become "culturally sensitive" when they conduct research, but also use
approaches that form part of indigenous people's cultures. The time has come for the Global South to
discontinue mimicking its counterparts in the north in knowledge production and pedagogy. Research
conducted in the south should take cognisance of different worldviews, which are closely tied to
people's relationship with the environment (McKenzie & Morrissette, 2003). In the quotation below,
Santos (2014) stresses the need to adopt "epistemologies of the South"', which will capture:
a set of inquiries into the construction and validation of knowledge born in struggle, of ways of
knowing developed by social groups as part of their resistance against the systematic injustices and
oppressions caused by capitalism, colonialism, and patriarchy (Santos, 2014).
Europe and its history have been the centre of attention for too long. Asante (1998:1) argues that "to be
centred is to be located as an agent instead of as 'the Other'". Africa 32 Decolonising Education in the
Global South and its indigenous people are described as the "other". Taiwo (1993:895) observed that
"colonialism, at least in Africa, is distinguished more by what it excluded from the colonies than what
it included". Africa was described in terms of Eurocentric contexts and very often indigenous
perspectives and history were ignored. Eurocentrism mediated the whole world in that any history that
differed from Eurocentric thought was relegated to the periphery and left unacknowledged (Blaut,
1993). Western educational thought was promoted through the works of scholars such as Augustine,
Socrates and Luther. When the history of indigenous people was acknowledged, a Eurocentric lens
was often used to assess the legitimacy of such a knowledge system.