Please also note that the author of this document will not be responsible for any plagiarism you
commit.
Question 1(a)
1. Define "comparative education".
Comparative education is a diverse field with no single universally accepted definition, often
described as having fluid boundaries. It adopts a three-in-one perspective, examining education
systems within their broader societal contexts—including geographic, economic, cultural, and
political influences—while also comparing different systems or aspects of them. The field has
evolved into Comparative and International Education (CIE), where international education involves
studying education from a global viewpoint. Ultimately, individual or regional studies contribute to a
broader understanding of education worldwide.
2. Discuss any four phases of the historical evolution of the field of comparative and
international education.
Phase 2: Systematic Study for Policy Borrowing (Since 1830)
The early 19th century saw government officials studying foreign education systems to adopt best
practices for national improvement. For example, France’s Victor Cousin analyzed European
systems, influencing the Guizot Act of 1833, which established primary education. This phase was
tied to nation-building but often lacked scientific rigor, leading to uncritical borrowing without
considering contextual differences between countries.
Phase 3: International Cooperation (Since 1925)
This phase shifted focus from national interests to global collaboration, driven by figures like
Marc-Antoine Jullien de Paris, the "father of Comparative Education." His vision materialized
through organizations like UNESCO, international research (e.g., IEA studies), and academic
societies, emphasizing education as a tool for universal human progress rather than just national
advancement.
Phase 5: Social Science Influence (Since 1960)
Comparative education adopted structural-functionalism and modernization theory, framing
education as a catalyst for societal change. Influenced by economics and sociology, this phase
promoted education as key to development, especially in the Global South. However, it assumed a
linear path to modernization, often overlooking local realities in favor of Western models.
Phase 7: Heterogeneity and Global Reevaluation (Since 1990)
Recent decades reflect diverse methodologies and critiques of Northern dominance. The field now
balances global trends (e.g., GERM) with local contexts, while scholars challenge Eurocentric
perspectives. The rise of the Global South demands reevaluation, with calls to decentralize
knowledge production and address power imbalances in comparative research.